Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of postsynaptic potentials of tectal neurons of the frog: correlation with impulses recorded from the terminals of retinotectal afferents

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the synaptic action between terminals of retinal ganglion cell axons and tectal neurons. To accomplish this, an extracellular single unit identified as retinotectal fiber was first isolated from the superficial layer of the optic tectum and intracellular responses were recorded from a tectal neuron in the vicinity of the extracellular recording electrode. “On-off” retinal fibers and both E-E (EPSP at “on” and “off” of diffuse light) and EI-EI type (EPSP-IPSP combination at “on” and “off” of diffuse light) tectal neurons were selected for the pre- and postsynaptic pair. Postsynaptic responses to a small moving square were averaged by triggering with the isolated presynaptic impulses. The latency of the resultant EPSPs indicated that most of the E-E and EI-EI type tectal neurons were monosynaptically activated by “on-off” retinal fibers. One of the E-E type tectal neurons was identified as a large ganglionic neuron in layer 8.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghajanian GK, Vandermaelen CP (1982) Intracellular identification of central noradrenergic and serotonergic neurons by a new double labeling procedure. J Neurosci 2: 1786–1792

    Google Scholar 

  • Antal M, Matsumoto N, Székey G (1986) Tectal neurons of the frog: intracellular recording and labeling with cobalt electrodes. J Comp Neurol 246: 238–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookhart JM, Fadiga E (1960) Potential fields initiated during monosynaptic activation of frog motoneurons. J Physiol 150: 633–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Grüsser O-J, Grüsser-Cornehls U (1976) Neurophysiology of the anuran visual system. In: Llinás R, Precht W (eds) Frog neurobiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 298–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettvin JY, Maturana HR, McCulloch WS, Pitts WH (1959) What the frog's eye tells the frog's brain. Proc IRE 47: 1940–1951

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto N, Bando T (1980) Excitatory synaptic potentials and morphological classification of tectal neurons of the frog. Brain Res 192: 39–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto N, Schwippert WW, Evert J-P (1986) Intracellular activity of morphologically identified neurons of the grass frog's optic tectum in response to moving configurational visual stimuli. J Comp Physiol 159: 721–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkel DH, Gerstein GL, Moor GP (1967) Neuronal spike trains II. Simultaneous spike trains. Biophysical J 7: 419–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter HD (1972) Terminal arborizations of retinotectal axons in the bullfrog. J Comp Neurol 144: 269–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyama K, Kimura M, Tanaka K (1981) Cross-correlation analysis of interneuronal connectivity in cat visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 46: 191–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Witpaard J, Ter Keurs HEDJ (1975) A reclassification of retinal ganglion cells in the frog, based upon tectal endings and response properties. Vision Res 15: 1333–1338

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagano, K., Li, QL., Tamada, A. et al. An analysis of postsynaptic potentials of tectal neurons of the frog: correlation with impulses recorded from the terminals of retinotectal afferents. Exp Brain Res 70, 429–432 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248367

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248367

Key words

Navigation