Skip to main content
Log in

Steady state pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim 300 mg once daily in healthy volunteers assessed by two independent methods

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The steady state pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim was determined after 300 mg orally once daily to 6 healty volunteers for 9 days. The microbiological assay of plasma level was unreliable at trimethoprim concentrations >4 µg/ml, so results from an HPLC-assay are given. Steady state was present after 3 days. The plasma concentration peaked 1 to 4 h (mean 2.0 h) after the dose at a mean of 6.0 µg/ml (range 3.1–9.5 µg/ml); the minimum value was 1.5 µg/ml (range 0.6–2.9 µg/ml). The mean AUCss was 77 µg/ml · h and the mean plasma clearancess was 67 and 74 ml/min on Days 8 and 9. Renal clearance was about 60% of the plasma clearance. The average plasma half life was 10.6 h (range 8.7–15.3 h). Thus, there was considerable interindividual variation in all pharmacokinetic parameters. 72 h after the last dose trimethoprim was detectable in plasma in only 1 of the 6 subjects. The minimum urinary concentration of trimethoprim during treatment was always well above (range 22 to 220 µg/ml) the MIC values for most urinary tract pathogens. Therefore, a daily dose of 300 mg trimethoprim results in a therapeutic concentration in urine at steady state that lasts throughout the dosing interval and in most subjects probably lasts also for a further 24 h. Trimethoprim administration raised mean serum creatinine from 67 to 97 µmol/l, probably due to competitive inhibition of the tubular secretion of creatinine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlmén J, Frisén J, Ekbladh G (1982) Experience of three-day trimethoprim therapy for dysuria-frequency in primary health care. Scand J Infect Dis 14: 213–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DA, Chuter PJ, Dawson MJ, Eden BW, Moore RMA, Freestone DS, Morris CA (1981) Trimethoprim and co-trimoxazole in the treatment of acute urinary tract infections: patient compliance and efficacy. J R Coll Gen Pract 31: 274–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogden RN, Carmine AA, Heel RC, Speight TM, Avery GS (1982) Trimethoprim: A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic use in urinary tract infections. Drugs 23: 405–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfitt W, Hamilton-Miller IMT, Ludlam H, Damjanovic V, Gargan R (1982) Comparative trial of trimethoprim and cotrimoxazole in recurrent urinary infections. Infection 10 [5]: 280–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright KA, Stanbrige TN, Cooper I (1982) Comparison of once daily trimethoprim and standard co-trimoxazole in urinary infections. A clinical trial in general practice. Clin Trials 226: 152–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig WA, Kunin CM (1973) Trimethoprim-sulfametoxazole: pharmacodynamic effects of urinary pH and impaired renal function. Ann Int Med 78: 491–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Editorial (1980) Trimethoprim. Lancet 1: 519–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomeini C, Gomeini R (1978) IGPHARM Interactive graphic package for pharmacokinetic analysis. Computer Biomed Research 14: 345–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Iravani A, Richard GA, Baer H (1982) Trimethoprim once daily vs. nitrofurantoin in treatment of acute urinary tract infections in young women, with special reference to periurethral, vaginal, and fecal flora. Rev Infect Dis 4: 378–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Kainer G, Rosenberg AR (1981) Effect of co-trimoxazole on the glomerular filtration rate of healthy adults. Chemother 27: 229–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasanen A, Anttila M, Elfving R, Kahela P, Saarimaa H, Sundquist H, Tikkanen R, Toivanen P (1978) Trimethoprim. Pharmacology, antimicrobial activity and clinical use in urinary tract infections. Ann Clin Res 10 [Suppl 22]: 7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremers P, Duvivier J, Heusghem C (1974) Pharmacokinetic studies of co-trimoxazole in man after single and repeated doses. J Clin Pharmacol 14: 112–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Hollyer R, Rodelas R, Preuss HG (1981) The influence of trimethoprim, sulfametoxazole and creatinine on renal organic anion and cation transport in rat kidney tissue. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 58: 184–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Light RB, Ronald AR, Harding GKM, Dikkema J, Thompson L, Buckwold FJ (1981) Trimethoprim alone in the treatment and prophylaxis of urinary tract infection. Arch Int Med 141: 1807–1810

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel RB, Welling PG (1980) Clinical pharmacokinetics of cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulphametoxazole). Clin Pharmacolkinet 5: 405–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz DE, Ziegler WH (1969) Assay and pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim in man. Postgrad Med J [Suppl] 45: 32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpstone P (1969) The renal handling of trimethoprim and sulphamethoxazole in man. Postgrad Med J [Suppl] 45: 38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Vree TB, Hekster YA, Baars AM, Damsma JE, van der Kleijn E (1978) Determination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (cotrimoxazole) in body fluids of man by means of high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 146: 103–112

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Odlind, B., Hartvig, P., Fjellström, K.E. et al. Steady state pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim 300 mg once daily in healthy volunteers assessed by two independent methods. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 26, 393–397 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00548773

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00548773

Key words

Navigation