Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetics of theophylline and enprofylline in patients requiring a high or low dose of theophylline

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In patients requiring a high or low dose of theophylline the pharmacokinetics of theophylline and enprofylline were studied. The low-dose group took an average daily dose of 8.91 mg/kg body wt. and the high-dose group 24.75 mg/kg body wt. The average half-life of theophylline in the former was 7.11 h and in the latter 4.72 h. The average clearances (CL) of theophylline were 2.83 and 4.58 l/h, respectively. The daily oral intake of theophylline was negatively correlated with the theophylline t1/2 (r=−0.63). While the t1/2 of enprofylline was similar in the two groups, CL and volume of distribution (Vc) were slightly (about 30%) but significantly higher in patients requiring a high dose of theophylline. CL of enprofylline did not correlate with CL of theophylline, nor was the Vc of the two drugs correlated. Interindividual variability in t1/2 and CL was considerably lower for enprofylline than for theophylline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Laursen LC, Johannesson N, Fagerström P-O, Weeke B (1983) Intravenous administration of enprofylline to asthmatic patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 24: 323–327

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lunell E, Andersson K-E, Persson CGA, Svedmyr N (1984) Intravenous enprofylline in asthma patients. Eur J Respir Dis 65: 28–34

    Google Scholar 

  3. Laursen LC, Johannesson N, Dirksen A, Djurup R, Munch EP, Taudorf E, Weeke B (1983) Enprofylline — effects of a new bronchodilating xanthine derivative in asthmatic patients. Allergy 38: 75–79

    Google Scholar 

  4. Laursen LC, Johannesson N, Weeke B (1984) Continuous treatment of asthmatic patients with enprofylline and theophylline. Eur J Respir Dis 65: 504–508

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borgå O, Andersson K-E, Edholm L-E, Fagerström P-O, Lunell E, Persson CGA (1983) Pharmacokinetics of enprofylline in healthy subjects after intravenous single doses. Clin Pharmacol Ther 34: 799–804

    Google Scholar 

  6. Persson CGA, Karlsson J-A, Erjefält I (1982) Differentiation between bronchodilation and universal adenosine antagonism among xanthine derivatives. Life Sci 30: 2181–2189

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jenne JW, Wyze E, Rood FS, MacDonald FM (1972) Pharmacokinetics of theophylline. Application to adjustment of the clinical dose of aminophylline. Clin Pharmacol Ther 13: 349–360

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benet LZ (1984) Pharmacokinetic parameters: Which are necessary to define a drug substance? Eur J Respir Dis 65 [Suppl 134]: 45–61

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edholm L-E (1980) Specific methods for theophylline assay in biological samples. Eur J Respir Dis 61 [Suppl] 109: 45–53

    Google Scholar 

  10. Benet LZ, Galeazzi RL (1979) Noncompartmental determination of the steady-state volume of distribution. J Pharm Sci 68: 1071–1074

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith DE, Gambertoglio JG, Vincenti F, Benet LZ (1981) Furosemide kinetics and dynamics after kidney transplant. Clin Pharmacol Ther 30: 105–113

    Google Scholar 

  12. Laursen LC, Johannesson N, Søndergaard I, Weeke B (1984) Maximally effective plasma concentrations of enprofylline and theophylline during constant infusion. Br J Clin Pharmacol 18: 591–595

    Google Scholar 

  13. Laursen LC, Johannesson N, Weeke B (1984) Continuous treatment of asthmatic patients with enprofylline and theophylline. Eur J Respir Dis 65: 504–508

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laursen, L.C., Johannesson, N. & Weeke, B. Pharmacokinetics of theophylline and enprofylline in patients requiring a high or low dose of theophylline. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 29, 115–117 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00547379

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00547379

Key words

Navigation