Skip to main content
Log in

Extradural and parenteral pethidine as analgesia after total hip replacement: Effects and kinetics. A controlled clinical study

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Twenty-one patients who had undergone total hip replacement were randomly assigned to one of three groups in order to compare a single dose of 1 mg/kg of pethidine im (I) and 20 mg (II) or 60 mg of extradural pethidine (III) in a double-blind design.

The degree of analgesia, the adverse effects, and the kinetics were studied for 18 h. Pain was monitored using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Supplementary doses of oxycodone if required were given no earlier than 0.75 h after pethidine. Plasma concentrations of pethidine were measured with gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS). Hypoalgesia to pin prick test was evaluated.

Low pain scores were observed in the extradural groups between 0.25 and 1.5 h after the dose. A significant difference in pain score compared with the im group was found after the higher extradural dose only between 0.5 and 1 h (p<0.05).

The area under the curve (AUC) of pain score versus time (0–18 h) was not significantly different between groups. The recorded adverse effects were minor in all three groups. The terminal half-lives and plasma clearances of pethidine, and the time to peak concentration were not different between the groups. Single patients in the extradural groups showed hypoalgesia to pin prick in parallel to the effect.

The present study shows that extradural pethidine produces shortlived analgesia, in contrast to the long-lasting effect of morphine found in other studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gustafsson LL, Schildt B, Jacobsen K (1982) Adverse effects of extradural and intrathecal opiates: report of a nationwide survey in Sweden. Br J Anaesth 54: 479–485

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cousins MJ, Mather LE (1984) Intrathecal and epidural administration of opioids. Anesthesiology 61: 276–310

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gustafsson LL, Friberg-Nielsen S, Garle M, Mohall A, Rane A, Schildt B, Symreng T (1982) Extradural and parenteral morphine: kinetics and effects. A controlled clinical study. Br J Anaesth 54: 1167–1174

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yaksh TL (1981) Spinal opiate analgesia: characteristics and principles of action. Pain 11: 293–346

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charnley J (1979) Low fracture of the hip. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bromage PR (1978) Epidural analgesia. WB Saunders, Philadelphia London Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moore AT (1959) The Moore self-locking Vitallium prothesis in fresh femoral neck fractures: a new low posterior approach. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery. Instruction Course Lecture, vol 16. Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joyce CRB, Zutshi DW, Hrubes V, Mason RM (1975) Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 8: 415–420

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tomson G, Garle M, Thalme B, Nisell H, Nylund L, Rane A (1982) Maternal kinetics and transplacental passage of pethidine during labour. Br J Clin Pharmacol 13: 653–659

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rowland M, Tozer TN (1980) Clinical pharmacokinetics. Concepts and applications. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  11. Daniel WW (1978) Applied nonparametric statistics. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  12. Glynn CJ, Mather LE, Cousins MJ, Graham JR, Wilson PR (1981) Peridural meperidine in man: analgetic response, pharmacokinetics and transmission into CSF. Anesthesiology 55: 520–526

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rutter DV, Skewes DK, Morgan M (1981) Extradural opioids for postoperative analgesia. A double-blind comparison of pethidine, fentanyl and morphine. Br J Anaesth 53: 915–920

    Google Scholar 

  14. Torda TA, Pybus DA (1982) Comparison of four narcotic analgesics for extradural analgesia. Br J Anaesth 54: 291–295

    Google Scholar 

  15. Payne KA (1983) Epidural versus intramuscular pethidine in postoperative pain relief. SA Med Tydskrift 63: 196–210

    Google Scholar 

  16. Loan WB, Morrisson JD (1967) The incidence and severity of postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth 39: 695–698

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gustafsson LL, Post C, Edvardsen B, Ramsay CH (1985) Distribution of morphine and meperidine after intrathecal administration in rat and mouse. Anesthesiology (in press)

  18. Way EL (1946) Studies on the local anesthetic properties of isonipecaine. J Am Pharm Ass 35: 44–47

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mircea N, Constantintinescu C, Jianu E, Busu G, Ene C, Daschievici S, Wedelcu A, Leoveanu A (1982) L'anesthésie sousarachnoidienne par la péthidine. Ann Fr Anesth Réanim I: 167–171

    Google Scholar 

  20. Skjöldebrand A, Garle M, Gustafsson LL, Johansson H, Lunell NO, Rane A (1982) Extradural pethidine with and without adrenaline during labour: wide variation of effect. Br J Anaesth 54: 415–420

    Google Scholar 

  21. Husemeyer RP, Davenport HT, Cummings AJ, Rosankiewicz JR (1981) Comparison of epidural and intramuscular pethidine for analgesia in labour. Br J Obstet Gynecol 88: 711–717

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tamsen A, Hartvig P, Fagerlund C, Dahlström B (1982) Patient-controlled analgesic therapy, part I: Pharmacokinetics of pethidine in the per- and postoperative periods. Clin Pharmacokinet 7: 149–163

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gustafsson, L.L., Johannisson, J. & Garle, M. Extradural and parenteral pethidine as analgesia after total hip replacement: Effects and kinetics. A controlled clinical study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 29, 529–534 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00635888

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00635888

Key words

Navigation