Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative bioavailability of a cisapride suppository and tablet formulation in healthy volunteers

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The comparative bioavailability of cisapride as a 30 mg suppository and three 5 mg oral tablets was investigated in 12 non-smoking, healthy male volunteers. The two formulations were administered on two separate occasions following an overnight fast, according to a randomized cross-over design. The plasma concentration of cisapride was measured over 48 h after drug administration. The 30 mg suppository exhibited a mean time to the peak plasma concentration of 3.8 h, while the tablets showed a significantly earlier peak time of 1.5 h. The maximum plasma concentration of cisapride after the 30 mg suppository (50.3 ng · ml−1) was significantly lower than after the tablets (74.3 ng · ml−1). The AUCs following the two treatments did not differ significantly from each other.

The comparative bioavailability of the 30 mg cisapride suppository in relation to the three 5 mg oral tablets was 85%, with a 95%-confidence interval of 67% to 102% (not adjusted for dose). Normalizing the mean AUC by dose, the relative bioavailability of the suppository was 43% of that of the tablet. The elimination half-life of cisapride was not significantly different following the administration of the two formulations (9.3 h for the suppository and 9.8 h for the tablet).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCullum RW, Prakash C, Campoli-Richards DM, Goa KL (1988) Cisapride. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use as a prokinetic agent in gastrointestinal motility disorders. Drugs 36: 625–681

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fraitag B, Cloarec D, Galmiche JP (1989) Cisapride: pharmacology, current therapeutic results and future prospects. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 13: 265–276

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meuldermans W, Van Peer A, Hendrickx J, Lauwers W, Swysen E, Bockx M, Woestenborghs R, Heykants J (1988) Excretion and biotransformation of cisapride in dogs and humans after oral administration. Drug Metab Dispos 16: 403–409

    Google Scholar 

  4. Woestenborghs R, Lorreyne W, Van Rompaey F, Heykants J (1988) Determination of cisapride in plasma and animal tissues by high performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr: 424, 195–200

    Google Scholar 

  5. SAS User's Guide: (1985) Statistics, version 5 ed. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Steinijans VW, Diletti E (1983) Statistical analysis of bioavailability studies: parametric and nonparametric confidence intervals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol: 24, 127–136

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van Peer A, Woestenborghs R, Verlinden M, Meuldermans W, Heykants J (1986) Pharmacokinetics of cisapride in healthy volunteers. Digestion: 34: 130

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hedner, T., Hedner, J., Gelin-Friberg, A. et al. Comparative bioavailability of a cisapride suppository and tablet formulation in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 38, 629–631 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00278595

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00278595

Key words

Navigation