Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of cyclophosphamide administered after total body irradiation of bone marrow transplant recipients

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

High-dose cyclophosphamide is used immediately after total body irradiation (TBI) in conditioning for bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Possible interactions of the two treatment modalities were sought by measuring the blood pharmacokinetics of CP and 4-hydroxy-cyclophosphamide (4-HOCP) in patients undergoing BMT.

There was a non-significant trend to a shorter half-life of CP compared to reported values. Exposure to 4-HOCP, the major metabolite of CP, did not appear to be altered by prior TBI of the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wagner T, Heydrich D, Jork T, Voelcker G, Hohorst HJ (1981) Comparative Study on human pharmacokinetics of activated ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide by a modified fluorometric test. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 100: 95–104

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buice RG, Veit BC, McAlpin SE, Gurley BJ, Sidhu P (1984) Effects of total body irradiation followed by bone marrow transplantation on the disposition kinetics of mitomycin-C in the rat. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 44: 401–410

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yukawa O, Nakazawa T (1973) Sites of X-irradiation induced damage in the microsomal drug metabolizing enzyme system of rat liver during development. Radiat Res 56: 140–149

    Google Scholar 

  4. Knott JCA, Wills ED (1974) The role of testosterone in the regulation of oxidative drug metabolism in normal and irradiated animals. Biochem Pharmacol 23: 793–800

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kergonou JF, Braquet M, Rocquet G (1980) Influence of whole-body gamma irradiation upon rat liver mitochondrial fractions. Radiat Res 88: 377–384

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yukawa O, Nakazawa T (1980) Radiation-induced lipid peroxidation and membrane-bound enzymes in liver microsomes. Int J Radiat Biol 37: 621–631

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yukawa O, Nagatsuka S, Nakazawa T (1983) Reconstitution studies on the involvement of radiation-induced lipid peroxidation in damage to membrane enzymes. Int J Radiat Biol 43: 391–398

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bernard P, Neveux Y, Rocquet G, Drouet J (1980) Studies of microsomal glucose-6-phosphatase on liver of irradiated rats. Enzyme 25: 250–257

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bitny-Szlachto S, Szyszko A (1979) Effects of whole body X-ray irradiation on induction by phenobarbital of rat liver glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and glutathione reductase. Acta Pol Pharm 36: 117–122

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wills ED, Wilkinson AE (1970) Effects of irradiation on sub-cellular components II. Hydroxilation in the microsomal fraction. Int J Radiat Biol 17: 229–236

    Google Scholar 

  11. DuBois KP (1967) Inhibition by radiation of the development of drug detoxification enzymes. Radiat Res 30: 342–350

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nair V (1967) Modification of pharmacological activity following x-irradiation. Radiat Res 30: 359–373

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bodo K, Benkö G (1986) Untersuchungen der Monoaminooxydase-Aktivität des Gehirns und der Leber von 60Co-gammabestrahlten Mäusen bei Verwendung einer Strahlenschutzverbindung. Radiobiol Radiother 27: 457–461

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nesterova TA, Smirnova TN, Tutochkina LT (1983) Hydroxilating activity of rat liver microsomes upon formation of proteins of acute phase during acute radiation sickness. Radiobiologiia 23: 672–675

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hagenbeek A, Martens AC (1987) Conditioning regimens prior to bone marrow transplantation in acute myelocytic leucemia. Bone Marrow Transpl 2 [Suppl]. 37–38 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hagenbeek A, Martens AC (1983) Efficacy of high-dose cyclophosphamide in combination with total-body irradiation in the treatment of acute myelocytic leukemia: studies in a relevant rat model. Cancer Res 43: 408–412

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gale R, Champlin R (1986) Bone marrow transplantation in acute leukemia. Clin Haematol 15: 851–872

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schuler U, Ehninger G, Wagner R (1987) Repeated high-dose cyclophosphamide administration in bone marrow transplantation: exposure to activated metabolites. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 20: 248–252

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alarcon RA (1968) Fluorometric determination of acrolein and related compounds with m-aminophenol. Anal Chem 40: 1704–1708

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heinzel G (1982) Salient points of various programs. TOPFIT, in Bozler G, Rossum JM: (eds): Pharmacokinetics during drug development: data analysis and evaluation techniques. Fischer, Stuttgart, p 207–211

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bagley CM, Bostick FW, DeVita VT (1973) Clinical pharmacology of cyclophosphamide. Cancer Res 33: 226–233

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sladeck NE, Priest J, Doeden D, Mirocha CJ, Pathre S, Krivit W (1980) Plasma half-life and urinary excretion of cyclophosphamide in chidren. Cancer Treat Rep 64: 1061–1066

    Google Scholar 

  23. Graham MI, Shaw IC, Souhami RL, Sidau B, Harper PG, Mclean AEM (1983) Decreased plasma half-life of cyclophosphamide during repeated high-dose administration. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 10: 192–193

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lind MJ, Margison JM, Cerny T, Thatcher N, Wilkinson PM (1989) Comparative pharmacokinetics and alkylating activity of fractionated intravenous and oral ifosfamide in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer Res 49: 753–757

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schuler, U., Waidelich, P., Kolb, H. et al. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of cyclophosphamide administered after total body irradiation of bone marrow transplant recipients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 40, 521–523 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315233

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315233

Key words

Navigation