Skip to main content
Log in

Lack of effect of magnesium-aluminium hydroxide on the absorption of theophylline given as a pH-dependent sustained release preparation

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Antacids can modify the pharmacokinetic parameters of sustained-release preparations of theophylline by changing the gastric pH. Though this has been studied with various theophylline/antacid combinations, the specific preparations investigated here have not previously been tested. The objective of the study was to assess any change in the availability of theophylline from a sustained-release preparation (SR), induced by the coadministration with an antacid.

The study was designed as a double-blind randomized crossover trial in the Pneumology Departments of three general hospitals.

Fifteen patients were studied. They all had stable asthma treated with theophylline and no major organ failure or gastro-intestinal lesions requiring the use of antacids. The antacide (aluminium hydroxide 800 mg and magnesium hydroxide 800 mg), or placebo, tid, was added to a stable regimen of theophylline SR bid, for 4 days, in crossover fashion.

Plasma theophylline concentrations were measured before and 1,2,3,4,6,8,10,12,16 and 24 h after the morning dose of Armophylline on the fourth day of each treatment period; the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to Cmax (tmax) were noted, and the area under the 24-h time-concentration curve (AUC0–24) and mean plasma concentration (Cmean) were computed. Peak expiratory flows on the same day, before and 3, 6 and 12 h after the morning dose of Armophylline were also measured.

There was no change in any of the parameters studied.

The addition of the antacide to theophylline, each given according to standard clinical practice, did not modify the pharmacokinetics of the latter. This result probably can not be generalized to all pairs of sustained-release theophylline-antacid preparations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jenne JW, Wyze E, Rood FS, MacDonald FM (1972) Pharmacokinetics of theophylline: application to the adjustment of the clinical dose of aminophyllin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 13: 349–360

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobs MH, Senior RM, Kessler G (1976) Clinical experience with theophylline: relationships between dosage, serum concentration and toxicity. JAMA 235: 1983–86

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rall T (1985) Central nervous system stimulants. In: Goodman A, Goodman L, Rall T, Murad F (eds) The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. Macmillan, New York, p 594

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nelson HS (1984) Gastroesophageal reflux and pulmonary disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 73: 546–66

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hendeles L, Lafrate R, Weinberger M (1984) A clinical and pharmacokinetic basis for the selection and use of slow release theophylline products. Clin Pharmacokinet 9: 95–135

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hurwitz A (1977) Antacid therapy and drug kinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet 2: 269–280

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gugler R, Allgayer H (1990) Effects of antacids on the clinical pharmacokinetics of drugs: an update. Clin Pharmacokinet 18: 210–219

    Google Scholar 

  8. Staib A, Loew D, Harder S, Graul E, Pfab R (1986) Measurement of theophylline absorption from different regions of the gastrointestinal tract using a remote controlled drug delivery device. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 30: 691–697

    Google Scholar 

  9. D'Athis P (1990) Programme Triomphe®: traitement interactif ordonné des modèles pharmacologiques elémentaires. Département d'Informatique Médicale, CHU de Dijon, France

    Google Scholar 

  10. Darzentas L, Stewart R, Curry S, Yost R (1983) Effect of antacid on bioavailability of a sustained-release theophylline preparation. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 17: 555–557

    Google Scholar 

  11. Myhre K, Walstad R (1983) The influence of antacid on the absorption of two different sustained-release formulations of theophylline. Br J Clin Pharmacol 15: 683–687

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arnold L, Spurbeck G, Shelver W, Henderson W (1979) Effect of an antacid on gastrointestinal absorption of theophylline. Am J Hosp Pharm 36: 1059–1062

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reed R, Schwartz H (1984) Lack of influence of an intensive antacid regimen on theophylline bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 12: 315–331

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rohr W, Henderson W, Shelver W (1981) In vitro adsorption of theophylline by antacids. Am J Hosp Pharm 38: 1779–1780

    Google Scholar 

  15. De Sommers K, Meyer E, Van Wyk M, Moncrieff J (1980) Fraction of theophylline in sustained-release formulation which is absorbed from the large bowel. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 38: 171–173

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muir, J.F., Peiffer, G., Richard, M.O. et al. Lack of effect of magnesium-aluminium hydroxide on the absorption of theophylline given as a pH-dependent sustained release preparation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 44, 85–88 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315286

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315286

Key words

Navigation