Skip to main content
Log in

Furosemide disposition in patients on CAPD

  • Pharmacokinetics and Disposition
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Single doses of oral and intravenous furosemide were given to 8 healthy male volunteers (40 mg) and 11 patients with renal failure maintained on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) (80 mg). In the volunteers, absorption was variable. Only one half of the intravenous dose and one third of the oral dose was available for renal pharmacological action as judged by the urinary recovery. In the patients, absorption was also variable and was markedly delayed (t max 128 vs 90 min) but more complete (bioavailability 70.1 vs 53.6%). The differences between the two groups were not significant, however (95% C.I.: -90 to 30 and -40.4 to 7.5 respectively). The mean elimination half-life was significantly longer in the patients following both the oral (228 vs 65.1 min) and intravenous dose (195 vs 60.3 min). The total body clearance of furosemide in the volunteers was 138 ml·min−1 and this was much lower in the CAPD patients (61.9 ml·min−1) in whom the renal clearance was minimal. The peritoneal clearance of furosemide was negligible. Although there were trends indicating differences in absorption between the two groups, the significant differences in furosemide disposition observed in CAPD patients were due to renal failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allison ME, Kennedy AC (1971) Diuretics in chronic renal disease: a study of high dose furosemide. Clin Sci 41:71–187

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chennavasin P, Seiwell R, Brater DC, Liang WMM (1979) Pharmacodynamic analysis of the furosemide-probenecid interaction in man. Kidney Int 16:187–195

    Google Scholar 

  3. Odlind B (1983) Determinants of access of diuretics to their site of action. Fed Proc 42:1703–1706

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rose HJ, O'Malley K, Pruitt AW (1976) Depression of renal clearance of furosemide in man by azotemia. Clin Pharmacol Ther 21:141–146

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brater DC, Anderson SA, Brown-Cartwright D (1986) Response to furosemide in chronic renal insufficiency: rationale for limited doses. Clin Pharmacol Ther 40:134–139

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bernet LZ (1979) Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of furosemide in man A review. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 7:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boles Ponto LL, Schoenwald RD (1990) Furosemide (frusemide). A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic review, part 1. Clin Pharmacokinet 18:381–408

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paton TW, Cornish WR, Manuel MA, Hardy BG (1985) Drug therapy in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Clinical Pharmacokinetic considerations. Clin Pharmacokinet 10:404–426

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lin ET, Smith DE, Bernet LE, Hoener B-A (1979) High-performance liquid chromatographic assays for furosemide in plasma and urine. J Chromatography 163:315–321

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hendeles L, Lafrate RP, Weinberger M (1984) A clinical and pharmacokinetic basis for the selection and use of slow release theophylline products. Clin Pharmacokinet 9:95–135

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huang CM, Atkinson AJ, Levin M, Quintanilla A (1975) Pharmacokinetics of furosemide in advanced renal failure. Clin Pharmacol Ther 16:659–666

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boutron HF, Brocard JF, Singlas E, Charpentier B, Fries D (1981). Pharmacokinetics of furosemide in CAPD. In: Gahl GM, Kessel M, Nolph KD (ed) Advances in peritoneal dialysis: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Peritoneal Dialysis, Berlin. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 90–92

    Google Scholar 

  13. Riva E, Fossali E, Bettinelli A (1982) Kinetics of furosemide in children with chronic renal failure undergoing regular haemodialysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 21:303–306

    Google Scholar 

  14. De Paoli Vital E, Casol C, Tessarin C, Tissone GF, Cavagna R (1981) Pharmacokinetics of digoxin in CAPD. In: Gahl GM, Kessel M, Nolph KD (ed) Advances in peritoneal dialysis: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Peritoneal Dialysis, Berlin. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 85–87

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bush A, Holt JE, Sankey MG, Kaye CM, Gabriel R (1983) Penetration of metronidazole into continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysate. Perit Dial Bull 3:176–177

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grech-Belanger O, Langlois S, Leboeuf E (1988) Pharmacodynamics of diltiazem in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J Clin Pharmacol 28:477–480

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chapman JR, Warbock DW (1983) Ketoconazole and fungal CAPD peritonitis. Lancet II:510–511

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andreasen F, Christensen CK, Jakobsen FK, Jansen J, Morgensen CE, Pederson OL (1982) The individual variation in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of furosemide in young male subjects. Eur J Clin Invest 12:247–255

    Google Scholar 

  19. Branch RA, Roberts CJC, Homeida M, Levine D (1977) Determinants of response to frusemide in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 4:121–127

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hammarlind MM, Paalzow LK, Odlind B (1984) Pharmacokinetics of furosemide in man after intravenous and oral administration. Application of moment analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 26:197–207

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smith DE, Lin ET, Benet LZ (1980) Absorption and disposition of furosemide in healthy volunteers, measured with a metabolite-specific assay. Drug Metab Dispos 8:337–342

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rane A, Villeneuve JP, Stone WJ, Nies AS, Wilkinson GR, Branch RA (1978) Plasma binding and disposition of furosemide in the nephrotic syndrome and in uremia. Clin Pharmacol Ther 24:199–207

    Google Scholar 

  23. Voelker JR, Cartwright-Brown D, Anderson S, Leinfelder J, Sica DA, Kokko J, Brater DC (1987) Comparison of loop diuretics in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Kidney Int 32:572–578

    Google Scholar 

  24. Beermann B, Dalen E, Lindstrom B, Rosen A (1977) Elimination of furosemide in healthy subjects and in those with renal failure. Clin Pharmacol Ther 22:70–78

    Google Scholar 

  25. Branch RA (1983) Role of binding in distribution of furosemide: where is non-renal clearance? Fed Proc 42:1699–1702

    Google Scholar 

  26. Verbeeck RK, Patwardhan RV, Villeneuve J-P, Wilkinson GR, Branch RA (1982) Furosemide disposition in cirrhosis. Clin Pharmacol Ther 31:719–725

    Google Scholar 

  27. Keller E, Reetze P, Schollmeyer P (1990) Drug therapy in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: clinical pharmacokinetic considerations. Clin Pharmacokinet 18:104–117

    Google Scholar 

  28. Peterson LR, Gerding DN (1980) Influence of protein binding of antibiotics on serum pharmacokinetics and extravascular penetration: clinically useful concepts. Rev Infect Dis 2:340–34

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, U., Prescott, L.F. & Winney, R.J. Furosemide disposition in patients on CAPD. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 48, 385–390 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194955

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194955

Key words

Navigation