Skip to main content
Log in

European postmarketing surveillance of ramipril in hypertension

1. Feasibility and study cohort

  • Pharmacoepidemiology And Prescription
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective observational cohort study of the angiotensin inhibitor, ramipril, was undertaken in four countries within the European Community-Netherlands, United Kingdom, Germany and Belgium. A total of 10,377 consecutive patients with essential hypertension were recruited to the study with the aim of follow-up for one year. Overall 37% of doctors who agreed to participate in the study actually enrolled at least one patient. One third of the doctors who enrolled patients in the study entered two thirds of patients studied. Some 15% of participating males and 27% of females were aged over 70 years.

Newly diagnosed hypertensives comprised 22% of the study cohort, the proportion being highest in UK and Netherlands, whereas 53% were established hypertensives of two or more years' duration, the proportion being highest in Germany and Belgium. There were substantial differences among the participating countries in the concurrent treatment these patients were receiving for hypertension, with two or more co-therapies being most frequent in Germany and Belgium. There were also substantial differences in co-therapies for concurrent diseases among the participating countries, reflecting both standard therapeutic practices in local areas and differences in marketing of drugs in the different countries.

This report describes the initial findings of this multinational study and emphasises the need to consider several major potentially confounding variables in the analysis of the outcome events both in this study and in other collaborative observational international monitoring schemes for adverse drug reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dollery CT, Rawlins MD (1977) Monitoring adverse reactions to new drugs. Br Med J 1:96–97

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lawson DH, Henry DA (1977) Monitoring adverse reactions to new drugs: restricted release or monitored release? Br Med J 1:691–692

    Google Scholar 

  3. Inman WHW (1981) Postmarketing surveillance of adverse drug reactions in general practice. Br Med J 282: 1131–1132 and 1216–1217

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stricker BH, Barendregt M, Herings RM, De Jong-van der Berg LT, Cornel MC, de Smet PA (1992) Ad hoc tracing of a cohort of patients exposed to acitretin (Neotigason) on a nationwide scale. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 42:555–557

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kapp JF, Zentgraf R, Widner A, Schopf E (1991) A need to intensify drug surveillance in Germany. Klin Wochenschr 69:775–779

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maggini M, Menniti FI, Alegiane SS, Traversa G, Fortuni M (1991) Drug utilisation studies within the VIDEOFAR project. Ann 1st Super Sanita 27:201–206

    Google Scholar 

  7. Albengres E, Gauthier F, Tillemar JP, (1990) Current French system of postmarketing drug surveillance. Int J Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 28:312–314

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kosasayawa A, Yoshida M, Okade S (1992) Postmarketing surveillance of probucol in Japan. Artery 19:147–161

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tilson H (1986) Postmarketing surveillance: the way forward. Centre for Medicines Research, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grahame-Smith DG (1986) Report of the Adverse Working Party to the Committee on Safety of Medicines, Department of Health

  11. Harcus AW, Ward AE, Smith DW (1979) Methodology of monitored release of a new preparation: buprenorphine. Br Med J:163–165

    Google Scholar 

  12. Colin-Jones D, Langman MJS, Lawson DH, Vessey MP (1982) Cimetidine use and gastric cancer: a preliminary report from a postmarketing surveillance study. Br Med J 285:1311–1313

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maclay WP, Crowder D, Spiros, Turner P (1984) Postmarketing surveillance: practical experience with ketotifen. Br Med J 288:911–914

    Google Scholar 

  14. Speirs CJ, Dollery CT, Inman WHW, Pawson NS, Wilton LV. (1988) Postmarketing surveillance of enalapril: Investigation of the potential role of enalapril in deaths with renal failure. Br Med J 297:830–832

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fletcher AP (1990) Profile of a large-scale cohort study. Drugs 40 [Suppl 5]:43–47

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jenner PN (1990) A 12-month postmarketing surveillance study of nabumetone: a preliminary paper. Drugs 40 [Suppl 5]:80–86

    Google Scholar 

  17. Waller PC, Wood SM, Langman MJS, Breckenridge AM, Rawlins MD (1992) Review of company postmarketing surveillance studies. Br Med J 304:1470–1472

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cooper WD, Sheldon D, Brown D, Kimber GR, Isitt VL, Currie WJC (1987) Postmarketing surveillance of enalapril: experience in 11710 hypertensive patients in general practice. J Roy Coll Gen Pract 37:346–349

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chalmers D, Dombey SL, Lawson DH (1987) Postmarketing surveillance of captopril (for hypertension): A preliminary report. Br J Clin Pharmacol 29:343–349

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chalmers D, Whitehead A, Lawson DH (1992) Postmarketing surveillance of captopril for hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol 34:215–223

    Google Scholar 

  21. Inman WHW, Rawson NSB, Wilton LV, Pearse GL, Speirs CJ (1988) Postmarketing surveillance of enalapril. I: Results of prescription event monitoring. Br Med J 297:826–829

    Google Scholar 

  22. Speirs CJ, Dollery CT, Inman WHW, Rawson NSB, Wilton LV (1988) Postmarketing surveillance of enalapril II: Investigation of the potential role of enalapril in deaths with renal failure. Br Med J 297:830–832

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hill PL, Bridgman KM (1992) A multicentre post marketing surveillance study to evaluate the safety of bisoprolol in the treatment of hypertension and ischemic heart disease. Br J Clin Res 3:85

    Google Scholar 

  24. Garrow JS (1988) Health Implications of obesity. In Obesity and Related Diseases. Churchill Livingstone, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Barkley DEH, Higson DI, Paterson KR (1993) The safety and tolerability of the beta-2 agonist Salbutamol in an event monitoring study of an oral controlled release formulation (Volmax). Pharmacoepidemiology Drug Safety 2:205

    Google Scholar 

  26. Inman WHW, Pearce G (1993) Prescriber profile and postmarketing surveillance. Lancet 342:658–661

    Google Scholar 

  27. Leufkens HGM, Urquhart J (1993) Prescriber profile and postmarketing surveillance. Lancet 342:1178

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fletcher AP (1993) Prescriber profile and postmarketing surveillance. Lancet 342:1179

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hense HW, Tennis P (1990) Changing patterns of antihypertensive drug use in a German population between 1984 and 1987. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 39:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hense HW, Doring A, Steiber J, Keil U (1992) The association of antihypertensive treatment patterns and adverse lipid effects in population-based studies. J Clin Epidemiol 45:1423–1430

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lawson, D.H., Bridgman, K., de Bock, G.H. et al. European postmarketing surveillance of ramipril in hypertension. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 49, 73–79 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192362

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192362

Key words

Navigation