Abstract
Objectives: Cold stimulation causes a finger skin vasoconstrictor response, which is regulated by stimulation of α-adrenergic receptors and is reduced by administration of prazosin. The purpose of this study was to investigate, using a laser Doppler flowmeter, whether the decrease in the finger skin vasoconstrictor response to cold stimulation produced by administration of two different α1-adrenoceptor antagonists, prazosin and urapidil, was correlated with the corresponding plasma drug concentration, and whether this method could be used to evaluate the relative potency of these α1-adrenoceptor antagonists in human subjects.
Method: In thirteen healthy male subjects (20–42 y), finger tip skin blood flow was measured during cold stimulation before and 1, 2, 3, 6, and 9 h after administration of placebo, prazosin (1 mg) or urapidil (60 mg).
Results: Both prazosin and urapidil significantly decreased the vasoconstrictor response to cold stimulation. The degree of the decrement in the response indicated by the reduction ratio was significantly correlated with the plasma concentration of prazosin and urapidil. The α1-adrenoceptor blocking activity of prazosin estimated by the regression lines was about 130-times more potent than that of urapidil.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that the cold stimulation response of finger skin vasoconstriction may be used to evaluate the relative α1-adrenoceptor blocking potency of drugs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sumner DJ, Elliott HL (1987) The pressor dose-response in clinical cardiovascular pharmacology. Br J Clin Pharmacol 23:499–503
Vincent J, Elliott HL, Meredith PA, Reid JL (1983) Doxazosin, an α1-adrenoceptor antagonist: pharmacokinetics and concentration effect relationships in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 15:719–725
Ekenvall L, Lindblad LE, Norbeck O, Etzell BM (1988) α-Adrenoceptors and cold-induced vasoconstriction in human finger skin. Am J Physiol 255:H1000-H1003
Khan F, Struthers AD, Spence VA (1988) The effect of prazosin on skin microcirculation assessed by laser doppler flowmetry. Br J Clin Pharmacol 26:267–272
Murai T, Sunai K, Miyao Y, Murata T, Kanda H, Osada E, Kubo T, Misu Y (1987) Pharmacological studies of urapidil(2): Effects on the adrenoceptors and vessels. Pharmacometrics (Oyo Yakuri) 33:365–376 (in Japanese)
Twomey TM, Hobbs DC (1978) Analysis of prazosin in plasma by a sensitive high performance liquid chromatographic-fluorescence method. J Pharm Sci 67(10): 1468–1469
Kukovetz WR, Ludwig G, Vergin H, Zech K, Steinijans V, Bruckschen EG (1977) Humankinetic und metabolitenmuster von urapidil. Arzneim.-Forsch./Drug Res. 27(II), 12:2406–2411
Stern MD (1975) In vivo evaluation of microcirculation by coherent light scattering. Nature 254:56
Salerud EG, Nilsson GE (1986) Integrating probe for tissue laser doppler flowmeters. Med Biol Eng Comput 24:415–419
Holloway GA Jr, Watkins DW (1977) Laser doppler measurement of cutaneous blood flow. J Invest Dermatol 69:306–309
Delius W, Hagbarth K-E, Hongell A, Wallin BG (1972) Maneuvers affecting sympathetic outflow in human skin nerves. Acta Physiol Scand 84: 177–186
Low PA, Neumann C, Dyck PJ, Fealey RD (1983) Evaluation of skin vasomotor reflexes by using laser doppler velocimetry. Mayo Clin Proc 58:583–592
Lindblad LE, Ekenvall L (1986) Alpha-adrenoceptors in the vessels of human finger skin. Acta Physiol Scand 128:219–222
Bylund DB, Eikenberg DC, Hieble JP, Langer SZ, Lefkowitz RJ, Minneman KP, Molinoff PB, Ruffolo RR, Trendelenburg U (1994) IV. Internal union of pharmacology nomenclature of adrenoceptors. Pharmacol Rev 46:121–136
Eltze M (1979) Investigations on the mode of action of a new antihypertensive drug, urapidil, in the isolated rat vas deferens. Eur J Pharmacol 59:1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harada, K., Fujimura, A., Kumagai, Y. et al. Effect of α1-adrenoceptor antagonists, prazosin and urapidil, on a finger skin vasoconstrictor response to cold stimulation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 49, 371–375 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203780
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203780