Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of age on venodilator effect of isoproterenol and amrinone

  • PHARMACODYNAMICS
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the influence of age on the venodilator effect of isoproterenol, a β-adrenoceptor agonist, and amrinone, a selective phosphodiesterase (PDE) III inhibitor, in human subjects.

Methods:

In eight young and eight elderly male subjects, the drugs were infused into a dorsal hand vein preconstricted with phenylephrine and its diameter was measured using a linear variable differential transformer.

Results:

The maximum venodilation (Emax) induced by isoproterenol was significantly smaller and the infusion rate of isoproterenol required to induce 50% of maximum venodilation (ED50) was significantly larger in the elderly than in the young subjects [Emax: 29.8 vs 95.1%, ED50: 97.3 vs 51.6 ng ⋅min–1]. A significant age-related change in Emax or ED50 was not observed for amrinone (Emax: 95.8 vs 100.8%, ED50: 40.1 vs 31.6 μg ⋅min–1).

Conclusion:

The data show that the venodilator effect of amrinone is not influenced by age. As amrinone increases cyclic AMP by inhibition of PDE III, it is suggested that the action of cyclic AMP is not altered by age. The decreased effect of isoproterenol might be caused by reduced production of cyclic AMP in elderly subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 18 April 1995/Accepted in revised form: 15 August 1995

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harada, K., Ohashi, K., Kumagai, Y. et al. Influence of age on venodilator effect of isoproterenol and amrinone. E J Clin Pharmacol 50, 37–40 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050066

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050066

Navigation