Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative DNA measurement by flow cytometry and image analysis of human nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current clinical staging, which includes the use of serum tumor markers and imaging techniques, fails to identify the 30–40% of clinical stage I (CS I) nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumor (NSGCT) patients who have occult metastatic disease. Therefore, there is a real clinical need to evaluate new biological parameters of the primary tumor that might be useful as predictors of occult metastatic disease. This study was undertaken to compare quantitative DNA measurements by flow cytometry and image analysis in CS I NSGCT, and to analyze the relevance of these parameters for predicting occult lymph node involvement. Different blocks of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded NSGCTs of 62 CS I patients who underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection between 1985 and 1989 were prepared according to the Hedley technique, and analyzed by quantitative cytometry. Thirty-six (58.1%) patients had histologically proven lymph node involvement (pathological stage II), whereas 26 (41.9%) patients (pathological stage I) had neither lymph node metastases according to retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) specimens nor tumor recurrence during follow-up. Concordant results were found in 76.5% of the samples by both cytometric techniques. For flow cytometry, the percentages of aneuploid cells in the S- and the G2M+S-phase were the most robust predictive parameters for lymph node involvement, whereas for image analysis the 5c exceeding rate (5cER) had the most predictive significance. Based on the experience obtained in this study, both cytometric techniques provide additional information on tumor aggressiveness that might be useful in therapeutic selection of early stage NSGCT patients for either RPLND or surveillance only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baldetorp B, Ferno M, Fallenius A, Fallenius-Vecchi G, Idvall I, Olsson H, Sigurdsson H, Akerman M, Killander D (1992) Image cytometric DNA analysis in human breast cancer analysis may add prognostic information in diploid cases with low S-phase fraction by flow cytometry. Cytometry 13:577

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bosari S, Wiley BD, Hamilton WM, Dugan JM, Cook LB, Lee AKC (1991) DNA measurement by image analysis of paraffinembedded breast carcinoma tissue: a comparative investigation. Am J Clin Pathol 96:698

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dawson AE, Norton JA, Weinberg DS (1990) Comparative assessment of proliferation and DNA content in breast carcinoma by image analysis and flow cytometry. Am J Pathol 136:1115

    Google Scholar 

  4. Einhorn LH (1990) Treatment of testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 8:1777

    Google Scholar 

  5. Emdin SO, Stenling R, Rous G (1987) Prognostic value of DNA content in colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 60:1282

    Google Scholar 

  6. Falkmer UG, Hagmar T, Auer G (1990) Efficacy of combined image and flow cytometric DNA assessments in human breast cancer: a methodological study based on a routine histopathological material of 2024 excised tumor specimens. Anal Cell Pathol 2:297

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fossa SD, Thorud E (1986) DNA flow cytometry of cells obtained from old paraffin-embedded specimens: a comparison with results of scanning absorption cytometry. Pathol Res Pract 181:200

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanselaar AGJM, Vooijs GP, Van't Hof-Grootenboer AE, Gemmink JH, De Leeuw H, Pahlplatz MMM (1991) Cytophotometric analysis of corresponding cytological and histological cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III specimens. Cytometry 12:1

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hedley DW (1989) Flow cytometry using paraffin-embedded tissue: five years on (review article). Cytometry 10:229

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hedley DW, Friedlander ML, Taylor IW, Rugg CA, Musgrove EA (1983) Method for analysis of celular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem 31:1333

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaern J, Wetteland J, Trope CG, Farrants GW, Juhng SW, Petterson EO, Reith A, Danielson HE (1992) Comparison between flow cytometry and image cytometry in ploidy distribution assessments in gynecologic cancer. Cytometry 13:314

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koss LG, Wersto RP, Simmons DA, Deitch D, Herz F, Freed SZ (1989) Predictive value of DNA measurements in bladder washings: comparison of flow cytometry, image cytophotometry, and cytology in patients with past history of urothelial tumors. Cancer 64:916

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lindmo T, Steen HB (1979) Characteristics of a high resolution flow cytometer based on a flow configuration. Biophys J 28:33

    Google Scholar 

  14. Merkel D, Dresseler L, McGuire WL (1987) Flow cytometry, cellular DNA content, and prognosis in human malignancy. J Clin Oncol 5:1690

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oud PS, Soeters RP, Pahlplatz MMM, Hermkens HG, Beck HLM, Reubsaet-Veldhuizen J, Vooijs GP (1988) DNA cytometry in dysgerminomas of the ovary. Int J Gynecol Pathol 7:258

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pizocarro G, Nicolai N, Salvioni R, Piva L (1992) Comparison between clinical and pathological staging in low stage nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors. J Urol 148:76

    Google Scholar 

  17. Riese W de, Allhoff E, Werner M, Atzpodien J, Kirchner H, Stief CG, Djamilian M, Schlick R, Jonas U (1991) Proliferative behaviour and cytogenetic changes in human renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 9:79

    Google Scholar 

  18. Riese W de, Walker EB, Riese C de, Jones JA, Foster RS, Donohue JP, Messemer J (1993) Predictive value of proliferative parameters in early stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT). J Urol 149:453A

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schuette WH, Shackney SE, MacCollum MA, Smith CA (1983) High resolution method for the analysis of DNA histograms that is suitable for the detection of multiple aneuploid G1 peaks in clinical samples. Cytometry 3:376

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sledge GW, Eble JN, Roth BJ, Wuhrman BP, Fineberg N, Einhorn LH (1988) Relation of proliferative activity to survival in patients with advanced germ cell cancer. Cancer Res 48:3864

    Google Scholar 

  21. VanDam PA, Watson JV, Lowe DG, Chard T, Shepherd JH (1992) Comparative evaluation of fresh, fixed, and cryopreserved solid tumor cells for reliable flow cytometry of DNA and tumor associated antigen. Cytometry 13:722

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vindelov LL, Christensen IJ, Nissen NI (1983) A detergenttrypsin method for the preparation of nuclei for flow cytometry DNA analysis. Cytometry 3:323

    Google Scholar 

  23. Williams NN, Daley JM (1990) Flow cytometry and prognostic implications in patients with solid tumors. Gynecol Obstet 171:257

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Riese, W., Walker, E.B., de Riese, C. et al. Quantitative DNA measurement by flow cytometry and image analysis of human nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors. Urol. Res. 22, 213–220 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00541895

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00541895

Key words

Navigation