Skip to main content
Log in

Radiographic evaluation of the lumbosacral disc height

  • Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract 

Objective. To establish criteria for the radiographic evaluation of narrowing of the L5–S1 disc height, which varies widely with transition of the L5 vertebra.

Design and patients. Nondegenerated disc heights of L3–4 to L5–S1 and the thickness and length of the L5 transverse process were measured on plain radiographs of the lumbar spine in 166 outpatients, aged 18–35 years (mean 26.3 years), in whom at least the L3–4 and L5–S1 discs both showed normal signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging. The level of the iliac crest was recorded semiquantitatively. The disc height was expressed as a percentage of the L3–4 disc height, namely ”relative disc height”. The ratio of disc height to the sagittal diameter of the overlying vertebral body was termed the ”disc height index”.

Results and conclusion. The relative disc height and disc height index of L5–S1 showed strong negative correlations with two anatomic variables, which were the relative thickness of the transverse process and the level of the iliac crest (P<0.0001). The results of linear regression analysis suggest that narrowing of the L5–S1 disc height can be evaluated on plain radiographs alone in relation to these anatomic variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 1 March 1999 Revision requested: 21 May 1999 Revision received: 19 July 1999 Accepted: 12 August 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inoue, H., Ohmori, K., Miyasaka, K. et al. Radiographic evaluation of the lumbosacral disc height. Skeletal Radiol 28, 638–643 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050566

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050566

Navigation