Abstract
Twelve countries participated in the WHO inter-comparison for which transmission CAP (College of American Pathologists) brain and CAP liver phantoms and emission London liver phantoms were used. A total of 157 imaging devices were tested. Overall results from the phantoms revealed a wide range of targets detected. For the CAP-phantoms target detectability dropped below 50% for target sizes less than 9 mm and below 60% for target contrast less than 0.84:1. On average one false positive and six false negative results were reported using CAP-brain phantoms and one false positive and one false negative result using CAP-liver phantoms. For the London liver phantoms containing the tissue equivalent rubber abdominal simulation the target of 1 cm was never visualised. Two targets in this phantom (2 cm and 2.5 cm) were correctly identified in 34% of studied and one of these targets in 52% of studies. Equivocal and false positive results were reported in 42%. The WHO inter-comparison demonstrated the need to establish new, or to improve the existing, quality control programmes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bergmann H, Busemann-Sokole E, Baert RJM, Herrera NE (1983) Results of a quality control survey in Austria and in Netherlands using CAP-trasmission phantoms. Eur J Nucl Med 8:A6
Herrera NE, Herman GA, Hauser W, Paras P (1980) College of American Pathologists Series X Survey Program. In: Medical radionuclide imaging. Proceedings of a symposium organized by IAEA in co-operation with WHO, 1–5 September 1980, Heidelberg. p 177–187
Mould RF (1983a) The London liver phantom, J Nucl Med 24:974–975
Mould RF (1983b) Review of the recent contributions of the IAEA and WHO to quality control procedures. In: Quality control of nuclear medicine instrumentation, CRS-38. Hospital Physicists' Association, London, pp 21–30
World Health Organization (1982) Quality Assurance in Nuclear Medicine. Guide prepared following a Workshop, 17–21 November 1980, held in Heidelberg. WHO, Geneva
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Volodin, V., Souchkevitch, G., Racoveanu, N. et al. World health organisation inter-laboratory comparison study in 12 countries on quality performance of nuclear medicine imaging devices. Eur J Nucl Med 10, 193–197 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00254460
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00254460