Skip to main content
Log in

Radionuclide angiography and magnetic resonance imaging: complementary non-invasive methods in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Constrictive pericarditis presents with a suggestive clinical picture, and its diagnosis is based on a haemodynamic pattern revealing impaired ventricular filling. In this study of 15 patients with pure isolated constrictive pericarditis, we attempted to evaluate the diagnostic value of two non-invasive methods not usually employed in this indication: radionuclide angiography (RNA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Whilst RNA permits analysis of the functional pattern of the global and segmental left ventricular filling impairment, MRI allows measurement of the thickness of the pericardium. RNA revealed increased early diastolic filling as evidenced by a shorter one-third filling time (TFl/3;P<0.0001 with respect to a normal population), a higher peak filling rate (PFR;P<0.01) and its early occurrence (P<0.001), increased one-third and mid diastolic filling fractions (P<0.01), and the ratio of the PFR over the peak ejection rate (P<0.01). During late diastole, the atrial filling fraction decreased (NS). The patients with constrictive pericarditis also showed a decrease in the physiological filling asynchrony, as assessed by segmental evaluations. Seven patients underwent MRI. The pericardium was thickened in all the patients, varying from 6 to 14 mm (normal: 2.5±0.7 mm), without any systolo-diastolic variation. Pericardial thickening appeared as a dark low-intensity signal band, demonstrating the fibrocalcific nature of the pericardial contents. Sagittal and coronal cross-sections were particularly well-suited to show the non-uniformity of the pericardial thickening. These results indicate that RNA and MRI are complementary non-invasive methods, and can provide the functional and anatomical information required for the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson PA. Diagnostic problem: constrictive pericarditis or restrictive cardiomyopathy?Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1983; 9: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Isner JM, Carter BL, Bankoff MS, et al. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy by computed tomographic imaging.Am Heart J 1983; 105: 1019–1025.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meaney E, Shabetai R, Bhargava V et al. Cardiac amyloïdo-osis, constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy.Am J Cardiol 1976; 38: 547–556.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Swanton RH, Brooksby IAB, Davies MJ, et al. Systolic and diastolic ventricular function in cardiac amyloïdosis.Am J Cardiol 1977; 39: 658–664.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tei C, Child JS, Tanaka H, Shah PM. Atrial systolic notch on the interventricular septal echogram: an echocardiographic sign of constrictive pericarditis.J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 1: 907–912.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hattle LK, Appleton CP, Popp RL. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler echocardiography.Circulation 1989; 79: 357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson PA, Palacios IF. Non-dilated cardiomyopathies.Adv Intern Med 1984; 30: 243–274.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pézard P, Furber A, Geslin P, Da Costa E, Jallet P, Tadei A. Altérations isolées du remplissage segmentaire du ventricule gauche chez le coronarien à fonction systolique normale. Etude par ventriculographie isotopique au repos.Arch Mal Coeur 1991; 84: 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Links JM, Becker LC, Shindledecker JG, et al. Measurement of absolute left ventricular volume from gated blood pool studies.Circulation 1982; 65: 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bonow RO, Vitale DF, Bacharach SL, et al. Effects of aging on asynchronous left ventricular regional function and global ventricular filling in normal human subjects.J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11: 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fowler NO. Constrictive pericarditis: new aspects.Am J Cardiol 1982; 50: 1014–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aroney CN, Ruddy TD, Dlighero H, et al. Differentiation of restrictive cardiomyopathy from pericardial constriction: assessment of diastolic function by radionuclide angiography.J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 1007–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bonow RO, Vitale DF, Bacharach SL, et al. Asynchronous left ventricular regional function and impaired global diastolic filling in patients with coronary artery disease: reversal after coronary angioplasty.Circulation 1985; 71: 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pézard P, Furber A, Lejeune JJ, et al. Global and regional assessment of diastolic dysfunction in coronary artery disease with normal systolic function by radionuclide angiography (abstract).Eur J Nucl Med 1989; 15: 481.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yamagishi T, Uki K, Yamauchi M, et al. Acute effects of sublingual isosorbide dinitrate on global and regional left ventricular diastolic filling in normal persons.Am J Cardiol 1986; 58: 1061–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gerson MC, Colhar MS, Fowler NO. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy by radionuclide ventriculography.Am Heart J 1989; 118: 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fouad FM, Tarazi RC, Gallacher JH, et al. Abnormal left ventricular relaxation in hypertensive patients.Clin Sci 1980; 59: 411–414.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sechtem U, Tscholakoff D, Higgins CB. MRI of the normal pericardium.AJR 1986; 147: 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Silverman PM, Harell GS. Computed tomography of the normal pericardium.Invest Radiol 1983; 18: 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ferrans VJ, Ishihara T, Roberts WC. Anatomy of the pericardium. In: Reddy PS, Leon DF, Shaver JA, eds.Pericardial disease. New York: Raven Press; 1982: 72–92.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts WC, Spray TL. Pericardial heart disease: a study of its causes, consequences and morphologic features.Cardiovasc Clin 1976; 7: 11–65.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sechtem U, Tscholakoff D, Higgins CB. MRI of the abnormal pericardium.AJR 1986; 147: 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Soulen RL, Stark DD, Higgins CB. Magnetic resonance imaging of constrictive pericardial disease.Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 480–484.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Masui T, Finck S, Higgins CB. Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: evaluation with MR imaging.Radiology 1992; 182: 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Suchet IB, Horwitz TA. CT in tuberculous constrictive pericarditis.J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16: 391–400

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Furber, A., Pézard, P., Le Jeune, J.J. et al. Radionuclide angiography and magnetic resonance imaging: complementary non-invasive methods in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. Eur J Nucl Med 22, 1292–1298 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00801616

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00801616

Key words

Navigation