Skip to main content
Log in

Osteoplastic laminoplasty for cervical myeloradiculopathy secondary to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Forty-seven patients with cervical myeloradiculopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament were treated by laminoplasty. The spinal canal from C3 to C7 was opened en bloc unilaterally and a spacer bone graft inserted to separate the floating laminae. The average follow up was 7.3 years (range 5 to 11 years). Favourable results were obtained in 35 patients and even though they had serious postoperative symptoms those with advanced neurological symptoms before operation showed considerable improvement. Late results were poor in patients who had greater than 50% compromise of the spinal canal by the ossified lesion. Laminoplasty is a safer method of obtaining favourable late results in patients with involvement of more than 3 vertebrae, but in those with a more severe compromise of the spinal canal by ossification, additional anterior decompression may be necessary later.

Résumé

Cet article présente les résultats à long terme de laminoplasties pratiquées pour myéloradiculopathie cervicale due à l'ossification du ligament vertébral commun postérieur, ainsi que les modifications observées dans les canaux rachidiens élargis. Habituellement le canal rachidien a été ouvert “en bloc” de C3 à C7, d'un seul côté, puis complété par une greffe osseuse afin de maintenir l'ouverture au niveau de la lame. On a utilisé la cotation de l'Association orthopédique japonaise, concernant la myélopathie cervicale, pour évaluer l'état des patients avant l'intervention chirurgicale, puis 2 ou 3 mois après la sortie et durant la période de surveillance. Les 47 patients de cette étude ont été suivis de 5 à 11 ans, soit en moyenne 7,3 ans. Les résultats finaux ont été favorables chez 35 patients et, même quand la symptomatologie postopératoire avait été assez préoccupante, les malades qui présentaient des symptômes neurologiques majeurs étaient notablement améliorés. Les résultats étaient mauvais chez les patients dont le rétrécissement du canal rachidien était supérieur à 50% (p<0.05). Il semble que la laminoplastie soit le moyen le plus sûr d'obtenir un résultat favorable mais une décompression antérieure complémentaire peut être nécessaire chez les patients atteints d'une sténose sévère due à une ossification du ligament vertébral postérieur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baba H, Tomita K, Umeda S, Kawahara N, Nagata S, Nomura S, Yugami H (1988) Clinical study of spinal cord evoked potentials. In: Ducker TB, Brown RH (eds) Neurophysiology and standards of spinal cord monitoring. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baba H, Shimada T, Imura S, Tomita K (1992) Cervical myelopathy treated by anterior and posterior combined surgery. Spine (Tokyo) 5: 533–539 (English abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baba H, Kawahara N, Tomita K, Imura S (1993) Spinal cord evoked potentials in cervical and thoracic myelopathy. Int Orthop 17: 82–86

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baba H, Shimada T, Imura S, Kawahara N, Tomita K (1993) Results of surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. 19th World Congress of Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT), Seoul, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, Kawahara N, Tomita K (1994) Laminoplasty following anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Int Orthop 18: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein NE (1992) Management of OPLL in 24 patients treated with anterior vertebrectomy and fusion versus anterior discectomy/fusion and laminectomy. J Neurosurg 76 (suppl): 375A

    Google Scholar 

  7. Epstein N (1993) The surgical management of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in 51 patients. J Spinal Disord 6: 432–454

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hirabayashi K, Miyasaka J, Satomi K (1981) Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 6: 354–364

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Herkowitz HN (1989) The surgical management of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy. Clin Orthop 239: 94–108

    Google Scholar 

  10. Japanese Orthop Assoc (1976) Criteria on the evaluation of treatment of cervical myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 49: Addenda 5

  11. Kawai S (1991) Cervical laminoplasty. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RH (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery, vol 2. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kimura I, Oh-hama M, Shingu H (1984) Cervical myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66: 914–920

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klara M, McDonnell DE (1986) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in Caucasians: diagnosis and surgical intervention. Neurosurgery 19: 212–217

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lecky B, Britton J (1984) Cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 46: 1355–1361

    Google Scholar 

  15. McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Bohlman HH (1987) Cervical cord compression from ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in non-orientals. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 69: 569–575

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ono K, Ota H, Tada K, Hamada H, Takaoka K (1977) Ossified posterior longitudinal ligament. A clinicopathologic study. Spine 2: 126–138

    Google Scholar 

  17. Satomi K, Hirabayashi K (1992) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. In: Rothman RH, Simeone FA (eds) The spine, 3rd edn, vol 1. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shinoda K, Shima I, Tomita K, Umeda S, Sawada Y, Baba H (1983) Results of surgical treatment for myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J West Pac Orthop Assn, Commemorative Issue: 93–96

  19. Tsuyama N (1984) Ossification of the posterior long-itudinal ligament of the spine. Clin Orthop 184: 71–84

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tominaga S (1980) The effects of intervertebral fusion in patients with myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. Int Orthop 4: 183–191

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tomita K, Nomura S, Umeda S, Baba H (1988) Cervical laminoplasty to enlarge the spinal canal in multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with myelopathy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 107: 148–153

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, Asano M, Ono K (1992) Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy: A comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 17: 1281–1284

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baba, H., Imura, S., Kawahara, N. et al. Osteoplastic laminoplasty for cervical myeloradiculopathy secondary to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. International Orthopaedics 19, 40–45 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00184913

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00184913

Keywords

Navigation