Skip to main content
Log in

Flexibility and alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy

A radiographic study

  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The long term effects of laminoplasty on cervical movement and alignment were investigated by radiography and CT scans in a study of 56 patients with multisegmental myelopathy who had undergone a C3 to C7 open-door laminoplasty. Follow up averaged 5.8 years. Satisfactory neurological improvement occurred in 73%. Cervical flexion decreased by 35% and extension by 57%; the decrease of both movement was statistically significant. Decreased vertebral slip, as well as slightly reduced lordosis, was seen after operation. Increase in measured canal size after operation and at follow up was 48% and 40%; 8% of the expanded canal size was lost at the last follow up. Expansive open-door laminoplasty leads to a better neurological prognosis in this group of patients, while maintaining an increase in canal size and preserving spinal stability.

Résumé

Les effets à long terme de la laminoplastie sur la mobilité et l'alignement du rachis cervical ont été étudiés par radiographie et tomodensitométrie. Le travail a porté sur 56 patients atteints de myélopathie spondylitique multisegmentaire, ayant subi une laminoplastie ouverte C3–C7 avec une greffe osseuse réalisant un espaceur autogène. Le recul est en moyenne de 5.8 ans (de 2 à 10.4) et les résultats ont montré une amélioration neurologique satisfaisante dans 73% des cas. La flexion était diminuée de 35% et l'extension de 57%. Cette diminution de la mobilité était statistiquement significative. On a également observé une réduction du glissement vertébral et une légère réduction de la lordose. L'augmentation de la taille du canal après l'intervention chirurgicale était de 48% et de 40% au dernier examen; à ce moment elle avait disparu dans 8% des cas. Les laminoplasties ouvertes étendues assurent un meilleur pronostic neurologique chez les patients atteints de spondylite multisegmentaire en maintenant la taille du canal et en préservant la stabilité vertébrale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, Kawahara N, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K (1993) Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine 18: 2167–2173

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, Kawahara N, Tomita K (1994) Laminoplasty following anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Int Orthop 18: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baba H, Tomita K, Imura S (1994) Adverse effects of anterior cervical fusion on unfused segments. Presented at the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, February 24–March 1

  4. Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK (1993) Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 75: 1298–1307

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carol MP, Ducker TB (1988) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; surgical treatment. J Spinal Disord 1: 59–65

    Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein N (1993) The surgical management of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in 51 patients. J Spinal Disord 6: 432–455

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goto S, Mochizuki M, Kita T, Kobayashi Y, Sodeyama T, Watanabe T, Kitahara H, Moriya H (1993) Anterior surgery in four consecutive technical phases for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 18: 1968–1973

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herkowitz HN (1988) A comparison of anterior cervical fusion, cervical laminectomy and cervical laminoplasty for the surgical management of multiple level spondylotic radiculopathy. Spine 13: 774–780

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herkowitz HN (1989) The surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy. Clin Orthop 239: 94–108

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ishihara A (1968) Roentgenographic studies of the morbidity of the cervical column in the sagittal plane. J Jpn Orthop Assoc (Tokyo) 42: 1033–1044

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jamjoom A, Williams C, Cummins B (1991) The treatment of spondylotic cervical myelopathy by multiple subtotal vertebrectomy and fusion. Br J Neurosurg 5: 249–255

    Google Scholar 

  12. Japanese Orthop Assoc (1975) Criteria on the evaluation of the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc (Tokyo) 49: addenda No. 15

  13. Kamioka Y, Yamamoto H, Tani T, Ishida K, Sawamoto T (1989) Postoperative instability of cervical OPLL and cervical radiculomyelopathy. Spine 14: 1177–1183

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kawai S (1991) Cervical laminoplasty. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RH (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery, Vol 2. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kawai S, Sunago K, Doi K, Saika M, Taguchi T (1988) Cervical laminoplasty procedure (Hattori's method) and follow-up results. Spine 13: 1245–1250

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nakano K, Harata S, Suetsuna F, Araki T, Itoh J (1992) Spinous process-splitting laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spinous process spacer. Spine 17: S41-S44

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nowinski GP, Visarius H, Nolte LP, Herkowitz HN (1993) A biomechanical comparison of cervical laminaplasty and cervical laminectomy with progressive facetectomy. Spine 18: 1995–2004

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ohmura F, Shirai Y, Nakagawa T, Yamaguchi J, Fujiwara A, Ohba S (1989) Cervical spine motion after expansive laminoplasty. Clin Orthop Surg (Tokyo) 24: 453–459

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sunago K, Kawai S, Oda H (1989) Postoperative radiographic evaluation of cervical laminoplasty. Clin Orthop Surg (Tokyo) 24: 445–452

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tomita K, Nomura S, Umeda S, Baba H (1988) Cervical laminoplasty to enlarge the spinal canal in multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with myelopathy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 107: 148–153

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wolf BS, Khilnani M, Malis L (1965) The sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal and its significance in cervical spondylosis. J Mt Sinai Hosp 23: 283–292

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yonenobu K, Fuji T, Ono K, Okada K, Yamamoto T, Harada N (1985) Choice of surgical treatment for multi-segmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 10: 710–716

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yonenobu K, Okada K, Fuji T, Fujiwara K, Yamashita K, Ono K (1986) Causes of neurologic deterioration following surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy. Spine 11: 818–823

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yoshida M, Otani K, Shibasaki K, Ueda S (1992) Expansive laminoplasty with reattachment of spinous process and extensor musculature for cervical myelopathy. Spine 17: 491–497

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baba, H., Maezawa, Y., Furusawa, N. et al. Flexibility and alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy. International Orthopaedics 19, 116–121 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00179972

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00179972

Keywords

Navigation