Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Production and water use in lettuces under variable water supply

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of a variable water supply on the water use, growth and yield of two crisphead and one romaine (i.e., Cos) lettuce cultivar were examined in a field experiment using a line source sprinkler system that produced a range of water regimes that occur in growers fields. Four locations at increasing distances from the main line were monitored through the season (i.e., from thinning to harvest, 28–63 days after planting (DAP)). These locations at the end of the season corresponded to: (1) rewatering to field capacity (FC); (2) watering with a volume 13% below that required in the field capacity treatment (0.87*FC); (3) 30% below FC (0.70*FC); and (4) 55% below FC (0.45*FC). A linear production function for dry matter accumulation and fresh weight vs. crop evapotranspiration (ETc) was determined for lettuce during this period, giving a water use efficiency for dry matter of 1.86 g m−2 mm−1 and for fresh weight of 48 g m−2 mm−1 . For lettuce irrigated to field capacity, ETc between thinning and harvest was 146 mm; maximum crop coefficients of 0.81–1.02 were obtained at maturity (55–63 DAP). For the three irrigation treatments receiving the largest water application, ETc was higher in the Cos culivar than in the two crisphead lettuce cultivars which had similar ETc. Plant fresh weight was more sensitive than dry weight to reduction in water supply. In the FC treatment, root length density and soil water extraction were greatest in the top 0–45 cm, and decreased rapidly below 45 cm depth. Soil water extraction by roots increased at lower depths when irrigation was reduced. Instantaneous rates of leaf photosynthesis and leaf water potential showed no response to the irrigation treatments in this study, despite differences in biomass production. Evaporation was determined to be the major component of ETc for 45 of the 63 days of the growing season. The large loss of water by evaporation during mid-season and the apparent insensitivity of lettuce to the volume of irrigation during this period may provide an opportunity for reducing irrigation applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AI-Khafaf S, Wierenga PJ, Williams BL (1978) Evaporative flux from irrigated cotton as related to leaf area index, soil water and evaporative demand. Agron J 70:912–917

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen SJ (1990) Measurements and estimation of evaporation from soil under sparse barley crops in northern Syria. Agric For Meteorol 49:291–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers RS, Branson RL (eds) (1973) Nitrates in the upper Santa Ana River basin in relation to groundwater pollution. Bulletin 861, University of California, Agricultural Experimental Station, Berkeley, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes DK (1983) Managing root systems for efficiency water use: breeding plants for efficient water use. In: Taylor HM, Jordan WR, Sinclair TR (eds) Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. Madison, WI, ASA, pp 127–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef B, Sagiv B (1982) Trickle irrigation and fertilization of iceberg lettuce. In: Scaife A (ed) Plant nutrition 1982: Proc 9th International Plant Nutrition Colloquium, Warwick University, England, August 22–27, 1982. Slough UK Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, pp 33–38

  • Bauder JW, Hanks RJ, James DW (1975) Crop production function determinations as influenced by irrigation and nitrogen fertilization using a continuous variable design. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 39:1187–1192

    Google Scholar 

  • Black CA (1966) Crop yields in relation to water supply and soil fertility. In: Pierre WH, Kirkham C, Pesek J, Shaw R (eds) Plant environment and efficient water use. Madison, WI, ASA, pp 177–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Madison, WI, ASA, Monograph No 9, pp 363–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper PJM, Keatinge JDH, Hughes G (1983) Crop evapotranspiration — a technique for calculation of its components by field measurements. Field Crop Res 7:299–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1977) Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. Irrig Drain Paper No. 24, FAO Rome Italy, p143

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerge TA, Roth RL, Gardner BR (1991) Nitrogen fertilizer management in Arizona. College of Agriculture, Univ of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, p 87

    Google Scholar 

  • Dullforce M, Garcia-Huidobro J (1974) Water relations of lettuce crops under glass. Acta Hortic 35:95–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein E, Grant WJ (1973) Water stress relations of the potato plant under field conditions. Agron J 65:400–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigin A, Letey J, Jarrell WM (1982) Nitrogen utilization efficiency by drip irrigated celery receiving preplant or water applied N fertilizer. Agron J 74:978–983

    Google Scholar 

  • Fereres E, Villalobos FJ (1990) The partitioning of evapotranspiration into evaporation and transpiration for the irrigation scheduling of vegetable crops. Acta Horticulturae 278:113–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood DJ, Draycott A (1988) Recovery of fertilizer-N by diverse vegetable crops: processes and models. In: Jenkinson DS, Smith KA (eds) Nitrogen efficiency in agricultural soils. Elsevier Applied Science, London, New York, pp 46–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory PJ, Tennant D, Belford RK (1992) Root and shoot growth, and water and light use efficiency of barley and wheat crops grown on a shallow duplex soil in a Mediterranean-type environment. Aust J Agric Res 43:555–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes DW, Yamada H (1982) Relation to cotton growth and yield to minimum leaf water potential. Crop Sci 22:134–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Haise HR, Hagan RM (1967) Predicting irrigation needs. In: Hagan RM, Haise HR, Edminster TW (eds) Irrigation of agricultural lands. Madison, WI, ASA, Monograph No 11, pp 577–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin A, Tennant D (1987) Root length density and water uptake in cereals and grain legumes: how well are they correlated? Aust J Agric Res 38:513–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks RJ, Keller J, Rasmussen VP, Wilson GD (1976) Line source sprinkler for continuous variable irrigation crop production studies. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:426–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks RJ, Sisson DV, Hurst RL, Hubbard KG (1980) Statistical analysis of results from irrigation experiments using the line-source sprinkler system. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:886–888

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson LE (1995) Root architecture in cultivated and wild lettuce (Lactuca spp.). Plant, Cell and Environment (in press)

  • Jackson LE, Stivers LJ (1993) Root distribution of lettuce under commercial production: implications for crop uptake of nitrogen. Biol Agric Hort 9:273–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson LE, Stivers LJ, Warden BT, Tanji KK (1994) Crop nitrogen utilization and soil nitrate loss in a lettuce field. Fert Res 37:93–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Letey J, Vaux HJ (1984) Water duties for California agriculture. Report prepared for the California State Water Resources Control Board. Sacramento. Agreement No. 2-043-300-0, p 110

  • Lorenz OA, Minges PA (1942) Nutrient absorption by a summer crop of lettuce in Salinas Valley, California. J Am Soc Hort Sci 40:523–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt WO, Doorenbos J (1977) Empirical calibration, a requisite for evapotranspiration formulae based on daily or longer mean climatic data? Presented at the ICID Conference on Evapotranspiration, Budapest, Hungary, May 26–28, 1977. International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage

  • Ritchie JT (1972) Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resour Res 8:1204–1213

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie JT, Burnett E (1971) Dryland evaporative flux in a subhumid climate: II Plant influences. Agron J 63:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowse HR (1974) The effect of irrigation on the length, weight and diameter of lettuce roots. Plant and Soil 40:381–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder EJ (1979) Leafy salad vegetables. AVI Publishing Company, Inc. Westport, Connecticut, USA, p 94

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale PJM (1966) The response of summer lettuce to irrigation at different stages of growth. J Hort Sci 41:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter PJ, Goode JE (1967) Crop responses to water at different stages of growth. Res. Rev No. 2. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, UK, p 245

  • Sammis TW (1980) Comparison of sprinkler, trickle, subsurface, and furrow irrigation methods for row crops. Agron J 72:701–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammis TW, Kratky BA, Wu IP (1988) Effects of limited irrigation on lettuce and chinese cabbage yields. Irrig Sci 9:187–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulbach K (1988) Crop water use and irrigation efficiency evaluation. Final Report, Monterey County Agricultural Extension Service, Salinas, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulbach K (1995) Estimating crop water use and irrigation requirements. Proceedings of the Nutrients and Irrigation management Conference, Salinas, CA, February 2, 1995

  • Shih SF, Rahi GS (1984) Evapotranspiration of lettuce in relation to water table depth. Trans ASAE 27:1074–1080

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Alderfer RB (1966) Effects of soil-moisture stress at different periods of growth of some vegetable crops. Soil Sci 101:69–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow J, Mills T, Zidar M (1988) Nitrates in ground water, Salinas Valley, California. Monterey County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Salinas, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder RL, Pruitt WO (1992) Evapotranspiration data management in California. Irrigation & Drainage Session Proceedings/Water Forum '92. Baltimore, MD, August 2–6, 1992. Amer Soc Civil Eng

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark JC, Jarrell WM, Letey J (1983) Evaluation of irrigation-nitrogen management practices for celery using continuous-variable irrigation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47:95–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton BG, Merit N (1993) Maintenance of lettuce root zone at field capacity gives best yields with drip irrigation. Scientia Hortic 56:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk M, de Willigen P (1987) Agricultural concepts of roots: from morphogenetic to functional equilibrium between root and shoot growth. Netherland J Agric Sci 34:273–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler RM, Mackowiak CL, Sager JC, Yorio NC, Knott WM, Berry WL (1994) Growth and gas exchange by lettuce stands in a closed, controlled environment. J Am Soc Hort Sci 119:610–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker TW, Ryder EJ, Rubatzky VE, Vail PV (1974) Lettuce production in the Unites States. Agriculture Handbook No 221. USDA/ARS, US Government Printing Office, p 43

  • Yunusa IAM, Sedgley RH, Tennant D (1994) Evaporation from bare soil in south-western Australia: a test of two models using lysimetry. Aust J Soil Res 32:437

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink FW, Yamaguchi M (1962) Studies on the growth rate and nutrient absorption of head lettuce. Hilgardia 32:471–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink FW, Yamaguchi M (1963) Head lettuce growth and nutrient absorption indicate need for re-evaluation of fertilizer practices. Calif Agric 63:13–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. L. E. Jackson

    Present address: Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidad de Almeria, Escuela Politecnica Superior, La Canada de San Urbano, E-04120, Almeria, Spain

  2. K. Schulbach

    Present address: University of California, Cooperative Extension, 1432 Abbott St., 93901, Salinas, CA, USA

  3. R. L. Snyder

    Present address: Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, 95616, Davis, CA, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Vegetable Crops, University of California, c/o USDA-ARS, 1636 E. Alisal St., 93905, Salinas, CA, USA

    L. E. Jackson, K. Schulbach, R. L. Snyder, R. B. Thompson & L. J. Wyland

  2. Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidad de Almeria, Escuela Politecnica Superior, La Canada de San Urbano, E-04120, Almeria, Spain

    M. Gallardo

Authors
  1. M. Gallardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. E. Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Schulbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. L. Snyder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. B. Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. L. J. Wyland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gallardo, M., Jackson, L.E., Schulbach, K. et al. Production and water use in lettuces under variable water supply. Irrig Sci 16, 125–137 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02215620

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02215620

Keywords

Search

Navigation