Skip to main content
Log in

0.5 T MRI of small renal masses: value of T2-weighted and Gd-DOTA-enhanced images

  • Original Articles
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared the value of T2-weighted and Gd-DOTA-enhanced T1-weighted images for the detection and characterisation of 33 small renal masses (14 clear cell carcinomas, 6 angiomyolipomas, 3 angiomyomas, 4 adenomas, 3 papillary carcinomas, 3 oncocytomas, 1 haemorrhagic cyst). Dynamic enhanced MRI was performed to study the tumoral vascular supply (19 cases). MRI depicted all the masses more than 1 cm in diameter, but missed all the lesions less than 1 cm (4 false-negative). The results of T2-weighted images and Gd-DOTA-enhanced images were similar as regards detection; however, Gd-DOTA-enhanced images depicted more clearly the tumours smaller than 2 cm (11 cases). MRI enabled the characterisation of only 3 masses (2 angiomyolipomas, 1 haemorrhagic cyst). New MRI features are described for oncocytomas (low signal intensity on T1-weighted images, high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, early and marked enhancement on dynamic enhanced MRI). Dynamic enhanced MRI did not contribute to the differentiation of benign from malignant tumours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lieber M (1935) Renal cell carcinoma: new developments. Mayo Clin Proc 60: 715–716

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bell ET (1950) Renal diseases. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 428–439

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bennington JL (1973) Cancer of the kidney: etiology, epidemiology and pathology. Cancer 32: 1017–1029

    Google Scholar 

  4. Evins SC, Vamer W (1979) Renal adenoma: a misnomer. Urology 13: 85–86

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amendola MA, Bree BL, Pollack HM, et al (1988) Small renal cell carcinoma: resolving a diagnostic dilemma. Radiology 166: 637–641

    Google Scholar 

  6. Curry NS, Schabel SL, Betsill WL Jr (1986) Small renal neoplasms: diagnostic imaging, pathologic features, and clinical course. Radiology 158: 113–117

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith SJ, Bosniak MA, Megibow AJ, Hulnick DH, Horii SC, Raghavendra BN (1989) Renal cell carcinoma: earlier discovery and increased detectio. Radiology 170: 699–703

    Google Scholar 

  8. Warshauer DM, McCarthy SM, Street L, et al (1988) Detection of renal masses: sensitivities and specificities of excretory urography/linear tomography, US, and CT. Radiology 169: 363–365

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bosniak MA (1991) The small (< 3.0 cm) renal parenchymal tumor: detection, diagnosis, and controversies. Radiology 179: 307–317

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hricak H, Thoeni RF, Carroll PR, Demas BE, Marotti M, Tanagho EA (1988) Detection and staging of renal neoplasms: a reassessment of MR imaging. Radiology 166: 643–649

    Google Scholar 

  11. Semelka SE, Shoenut JP, Kroeker MA, MacMahon RG, Greenberg HM (1992) Renal lesions: controlled comparison between CT and 1.5 T MR imaging with non-enhanced and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo and breath-hold FLASH techniques. Radiology 182: 425–430

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eilenberg SS, Lee JKT, Brown JJ, Mirowitz SA, Tartar VM (1990) Renal masses: evaluation with gradient-echo Gd-DTPA-enhenced dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 176: 333–338

    Google Scholar 

  13. Semelka RC, Hricak H, Slevens SK, Finegold R, Tomei E, Caroll PR (1991) Combined gadolinium-enhanced and fat-saturation MR imaging of renal masses. Radiology 178: 803–809

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quint LE, Glazer GM, Chenevert TL, et al (1988) In vivo and in vitro MR imaging of renal tumors: histopathologic correlation and pulse sequence optimization. Radiology 169: 359–362

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sussman SK, Glickstein M, Krzymovski GA (1990) Hypointense renal cell carcinoma: MR imaging with pathologic correlation. Radiology 177: 495–497

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fein AB, Lee JKT, Balfe DM, et al (1987) Diagnosis and staging of renal cell carcinoma: a comparison of MR imaging and CT. AJR 148: 59–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hilpen PL, Fridman AC, Raedecki PD, et al (1986) MRI of hemorrhagic renal cysts in polycystic kidney disease. AJR 154: 307–308

    Google Scholar 

  18. Curry NS, Schabel SH, Garvin AJ, Fish G (1990) Intratumoral fat in a renal oncocytoma mimicking angiomyolipoma. AJR 154: 307–308

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parvey LS, Warner RM, Callihan TR, Magill HL (1981) CT demonstration of fat tissue in malignant renal neoplasms: atypical Wilms' tumor. J Comput Assist Tomogr 5: 851–854

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marotti M, Hricak H, Fritzsche PJ, Crooks LE, Hedgcock MW, Tanagho EA (1987) Compex and simple renal cyst: comparative evaluation wit MR imaging Radiology 162: 679–684

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zinnski K, Anh YH, Rubinstein WA, Williams JJ, Pasmantier MW, Kazam E (1984) CT of the hyperdense renal cyst: sonographic correlation. AJR 143: 151–156

    Google Scholar 

  22. Quinn MJ, Hartmann DS, Friedman AC (1984) Renal oncocytoma: new observations. Radiology 153: 49–53

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bennington GL. Renal adenoma (1987). World J Urol 5: 66–70

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thoenes W, Störkel ST, Rumpelt HJ (1986) Histopathology and classification of renal cell tumors (adenomas, oncocytomas, carcinomas): the basic cytological and histopathological elements and their use for diagnostis. Pathol Res Pract 181: 125–143

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: O. Hélénon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Denys, A., Hélénon, O., Gilles, R. et al. 0.5 T MRI of small renal masses: value of T2-weighted and Gd-DOTA-enhanced images. Eur. Radiol. 3, 447–452 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221422

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221422

Key words

Navigation