Skip to main content
Log in

Imaging of the augmented and reconstructed breast: a retrospective study

  • Breast imaging
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The records of 71 patients with cosmetic breast implants or reconstructed breast following surgery for cancer were reviewed restrospectively. Of these 47 (66%) had cosmetic augmentation and 24 (33%) had reconstructive surgery. Analysis of radiological findings and correlation with clinical data showed recurrence of certain patterns and assessed their clinical relevance. Evaluation of mammographic views proposed by Eklund et al. [1] was also made. The role of US, CT, and invasive procedures was also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eklund GW, Busby RC, Miller SH et al. (1988) Improved imaging of the augmented breast. AJR 151: 469–473

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brody GS (1989) The effect of breast implants on the radiographic detection of microcalcification and by soft tissue masses. Plast Reconstr Surg 84: 779

    Google Scholar 

  3. Food and Drug Administration (1991) Collagen and liquid silicone injections. In FDA Backgrounder (newsletter). Food and Drug Administration, Washington DC, August 1991, 5.1

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dershaw DD, Chaglassian TA (1989) Mammography after prosthesis placement for augmentation or reconstructive mammoplasty. Radiology 170: 69–74

    Google Scholar 

  5. Young VL, Bartell T, Destouet JM et al. (1989) Calcification of breast implant capsule. South Med J 184:1171–1173

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andersen B, Hawtof D, Alani H et al. (1989) Plast Reconstr Surg 84: 903–907

    Google Scholar 

  7. Theophelis LG, Stevenson TR (1986) Plast Reconstr Surg 78: 673–675

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen IK, Scheflan M (1982) Plast Reconstr Surg 69: 898–900

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mitnick JS, Harris MN, Roses DF (1989) Surg Gynecol Obstet 168: 30–32

    Google Scholar 

  10. Douglas KP, Bluth EI, Sauter ER et al. (1991) Roentgenographic evaluation of the augmented breast. South Med J 84: 49–54

    Google Scholar 

  11. Silverstein MJ, Handel N, Gamagami P et al. (1990) Mammographic measurements before and after augmentation mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:1126–1130

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hayes H, Vandergrift J, Diner WC (1988) Mammography and breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 82: 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leibman J, Kruse B (1990) Breast cancer: Mammographic and sonographic findings after augmentation mammoplasty. Radiology 174: 195–198

    Google Scholar 

  14. Robertson CL, Kopans DB, McCarthy KA et al. (1989) Nonpalpable lesions in the augmented breast: preoperative localization. Radiology 173: 873–874

    Google Scholar 

  15. Picker RH, Jellins J, Kossoff G (1983) The ultrasonic appearances of the breast following surgery and radiotherapy. In: Jellins J, Kobayashi T (eds) Ultrasonic examination of the breast. John Wiley, New York, pp 141–146

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cole-Beuglet C, Schwartz G, Kurtz AB et al. (1983) Ultrasound mammography for the augmented breast. Radiology 146: 737–742

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rubin E, Miller VE, Berland LL et al. (1985) Hand-held realtime breast sonography. AJR 144: 623–627

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sorrentino, S., Schmidt, R., Donlan, P. et al. Imaging of the augmented and reconstructed breast: a retrospective study. Eur. Radiol. 4, 364–370 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00599072

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00599072

Key words

Navigation