Abstract
We report the case of a 44-year-old male presenting with deviation of the penis during erection. Upon physical and clinical examination the patient did not have the typical findings of Peyronie's disease, therefore he was admitted for further evaluation by conventional sonography, duplex Doppler ultrasound, endourethral ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Endourethral ultrasound and MRI provided evidence of Peyronie's disease with atypical involvement of the corpus spongiosum and, in addition, demonstrated nonpalpable plaques in the septum of the penis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Smith BH (1966) Peyronie's disease. Am J Clin Pathol 45: 670–678
Lopez JA, Jarow JP (1991) Duplex ultrasound findings in men with Peyronie's disease. Urol Radiol 12 (4): 199–202
Helweg G, Rauschmeier H, Zur Nedden D, Judmaier W, Sief R (1989) Die Wertigkeit der Sonographie in der Therapieüberwachung der Induratio penis plastica (Peyronie's disease). Fortschr Röntgenstr 151 (3): 298–300
Merchant SA, Kedar R (1990) Periurethral fibrosis on sonourethrography and balloon dilatation of urethral strictures. AJR 155 (2): 423
Afsar H, Sozduyar N (1992) Urethral manipulation syndrome (Kelami syndrome): acquired ventral penile deviation. Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl (Italy) 64 (4): 349–351
Merkle W (1990) Cause of deviation of the erectile penis after urethral manipulations (Kelami syndrome) demonstration of ultrasound findings and case report. Urol Int 45 (3): 183–185
Helweg G, Judmaier W, Buchberger W, Wicke K, Oberhauser A, Knapp R, Ennemoser O, Zur Nedden D (1992) Peyronie's disease: MR findings in 28 patients. AJR 158 (6): 1261–1264
Helweg G (1992) Die Wertigkeit bildgebender Verfahren in der Diagnostik und Therapiekontrolle der Induratio penis plastica (Peyronie-Krankheit) Urologe A 31 (1): 19–23
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Helweg, G., Frauscher, F., Strasser, H. et al. Atypically located Peyronie's disease: imaging findings. Eur. Radiol. 5, 669–671 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190941
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190941