Skip to main content
Log in

Breath-hold MR imaging of focal liver lesions: comparison of fast and ultrafast techniques

  • Abdominal Radiology
  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of breath-hold MR imaging using two T2-weighted hybrid sequences (TSE, TGSE), two T2-weighted single-shot sequences (HASTE, EPI-SE), and one T1-weighted gradientecho sequence (FLASH) was compared with a standard conventional T2-weighted SE sequence in 20 patients with focal liver lesions. Liver signal-to-noise ratio was highest spleen-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (54.3 ± 8.3) and thee HASTE (41.1 ± 12.5) sequence, whereas the highest spleen-liver contrast-noise-ratio was obtained by the TSE sequence (38.9 ± 20.7). Lesion-liver CNR was highest with the TSE sequence (63.9 ± 21.4). With both TSE and HASTE significantly (p < 0.01) more lesions were detected as compared with SE and EPE-SE sequences. Our results indicate that breath-hold TSE and HASTE sequences will eventually replace conventional T2-weighted SE techniques due to their insensitivity to motion artifacts, superior lesion detectability and inherently short acquisitions times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saini S, Modic M, Hamm B, Hahn P (1991) Advances in contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJR 156: 235–254.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Edelman RR, Wallner B, Singer A, Atkinson DJ, Saini S (1990) Segmented Turbo-FLASH: method for breath-hold MR imaging of the liver with contrast. Radiology 177: 515–521.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holsinger-Bampton AE, Riederer SJ, Campeau NG, Johnson CD (1991) T1-weighted snapshot gradient-echo MR imaging of the andomen. Radiology 181: 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mirowitz SA, Lee JKT, Brown JJ, Eilenberg SS, Heiken JP, Perman WH (1990) Rapid acquisition spin-echo (RASE) MR imaging: a new technique for reduction of artifacts and acquisition time. Radiology 175: 131–135.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rydberg JN, Lomas DJ, Coakley KJ, Hough DM, Ehman RL, Riederer SJ (1995) Comparison of breath-hold fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo pulse sequences for T2-weighted MR imaging of liver lesions. Radiology 194: 431–437.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saini S, Stark DD, Rzedzian RR, Pykett IL, Rummeny E, Hahn PF, Wittenberg J, Ferrucci JT (1989) Forty-millisecond MR imaging of the abdomen at 2.0 T. Radiology 173: 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Semelka RC, Simm FC, Recht M, Deimling M, Lenz G, Laub GA (1991) T1-weighted sequences for MR imaging of the liver:] comparison of three techniques for single-breath, whole-volume acquisition at 1.0 and 1.5 T. Radiology 180: 629–635.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Winkler ML, Thoeni RF, Luh N, Kaufman L, Margulis AR (1989) Hepatic neoplasia: breath-hold MR imaging. Radiology 170: 801–806.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Listerud J, Einstein S, Outwater E, Kressel HY (1992) First principles of fast spin echo. Magn Reson Q 8: 199–244.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feinberg DA, Oshio K (1991) GRASE (gradient- and spin-echo) MR imaging: a new fast clinical imaging technique. Radiology 181: 597–602.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen MS, Weiskoff RM (1991) Ultra-fast imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 9: 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Edelman RR, Wielopolski P, Schmitt F (1994) Echo-planar imaging. Radiology 192: 600–612.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reimer P, Saini S, Hahn PF, Cohen MS, Brady TJ (1993) Klinische Anwendung der echoplanaren MR-Tomographie in der Detektion fokaler Leberläsionen. RöFo 159: 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Foley WD, Kneeland JB, Cates JD et al. (1987) Contrast optimization for the detection of focal hepatic lesions by MR imaging. AJR 149: 1155–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reinig JW, Dweyer AJ, Miller DL, Frank JA, Adams GW, Chang AE (1989) Liver metastases: detection with MR imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T. Radiology 170: 149–153.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wittenberg J, Stark DD, Forman BH, Hahn PF, Saini S, Weissleder R, Rummeny E, Ferrucci JT (1988) Differentiation of hepatic metastases from hepatic hemangiomas and cysts by using MR imaging. AJR 151: 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bailes DR, Gilderdale DJ, Bydder GM, Collins AG, Firmin DM (1985) Respiratory ordered phase encoding (ROPE) method for reducing respiratory motion artifacts in MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9: 835–838.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bydder GM, Steiner RE, Blumgart LH, Kenia S, Young IR (1985) MR imaging of the liver using short T1 inversion recovery sequences. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9: 1084–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Felmlee JP, Ehman RL (1987) Spatial presaturation: a method for suppressing flow artifacts and improving depiction of vascular anatomy in MR imaging. Radiology 164: 559–564.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis CE, Prato FS, Drost DJ, Nicholson RL (1986) Comparison of respiratory triggering and gating techniques for the removal of respiratory artifacts in MR imaging. Radiology 160: 803–810.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Semelka RC, Chew WM, Hricak H, Thomei E, Higgins CB (1990) Fat-saturation MR imaging of the upper abdomen. AJR 155: 1111–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reimer P, Ladebeck R, Rummeny EJ, Repp H, Schmitt F, Bongartz G, Schuierer G, Lange T, Peters PE (1994) Initial feasibility studies using single-shot EPI for the detection of focal liver lesions. Magn Reson Med 32: 733–737.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hahn PF, Saini S, Cohen MS, Goldberg M, Reimer P, Mueller PR (1992) An aqueous gastrointestinal contrast agent for use in encho-planar MR imaging. Magn Rason Med 25: 380–383.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reimer P, Schmitt F, Ladebeck R, Graessner J, Schaffer B (1993) Evaluation of potential gastrointestinal contrast agents for echoplanar MR imaging. Eur Radiol 3: 487–492.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goldberg MA, Hahn PF, Saini S, Cohen MS, Reimer P, Brady TJ, Mueller PR (1993) Value of T1 und T2 relaxation times from echoplanar MR imaging in the characterization of focal hepatic lesions. AJR 160: 1011–1017.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: J. Gaa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaa, J., Fischer, H., Laub, G. et al. Breath-hold MR imaging of focal liver lesions: comparison of fast and ultrafast techniques. Eur. Radiol. 6, 838–843 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240685

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240685

Key words

Navigation