Skip to main content
Log in

Goldanskii-Karyagin effect versus preferred orientations (texture)

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Applied physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are two main contributions influencing the relative line intensities in a hyperfine pattern of a polycrystalline material: 1) Lattice vibrational anisotropy-Goldanskii-Karyagin effect (GKE) and 2) preferred orientation of the crystallites (texture).

We present the results of experiments and computer calculations of the line-intensity ratios for various orientation distributions. The two competing effects are hard to distinguish from an experimental point of view, and this evaluation should enable one to appreciate the magnitude of their respective contributions. A variety of textures is selected and discussed: For instance, the interesting case where the GKE and the texture produce the same effect on the relative line intensities. Generally speaking, it seems that in many qualitative discussions of quadrupole line asymmetries the influence of texture is underestimated, especially for small deviations from randomness. Conversely, the asymmetry in the spectra is often explained by making the ad hoc assumption of a GKE without realizing that this would require an unrealistic lattice vibration anisotropy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H.Frauenfelder, D.E.Nagle, R.D.Taylor, D.R.F.Cochran, W.M.Visscher: Phys. Rev.126, 1065 (1962)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. W.Kündig: Nucl. Instr. Methods48, 219 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B.P.Srivastava, H.N.K.Sarma, D.L.Bhattacharya: Phys. Stat. Sol. (a)10, K 117 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. V.I.Goldanskii, E.F.Marakov, I.P.Suzdalev, I.A.Vinogradov: Phys. Rev. Letters20, 137 (1968)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. R.M.Housley, U.Gonser, R.W.Grant: Phys. Rev. Letters20, 1279 (1968)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. V.I.Goldanskii, E.F.Makarov, I.P.Suzdalev, I.A.Vinogradov: Sov. Phys. JETP31, 407 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  7. I.A.Vinogradov, A.M.Pritchard, E.F.Makarov, I.P.Suzdalev: Sol State Commun.8, 965 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Proc. Conference Application of the Mössbauer Effect, Tihany, Hungary, ed. I.Dészi (Akadémiai Kiado, Budapest 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.L.Nagy, K.Kulscár, I.Dészi, B.Molnár: Hungarian Acad. Sci. KFKI-71-65, Budapest (1971)

  10. U.Gonser, M.Ron, H.Ruppersberg, W.Keune, A.Trautwein: Phys. Stat. Sol. (a)10, 493 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S.G.Cohen, P.Gielen, R.Kaplow: Phys. Rev.141, 423 (1966)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. U.Gonser: Z. Metallkde.57, 85 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  13. U.Gonser: Proceedings of 2nd Symposium on Low-Energy X- and Gamma-Sources and Applications (ORNL IIc-10, US AEC, 1967)

  14. P.A.Flinn, S.L.Ruby, W.L.Kehl: Science143, 1434 (1964)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was done in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree “Dr. rer. nat.”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pfannes, H.D., Gonser, U. Goldanskii-Karyagin effect versus preferred orientations (texture). Appl. Phys. 1, 93–102 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00887072

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00887072

Index Headings

Navigation