Skip to main content
Log in

Complications of primary retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection for low-stage testicular cancer

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The surgical complications encountered in 478 patients who underwent primary retroperitoneal lymphnode dissection for clinical stage A and B nonseminomatous testicular cancer during the period ranging from 1982 to 1992 were reviewed. There were 54 complications in 51 patients (10.6%), and there was no surgery-related mortality. There were 16 minor complications and 38 major complications. The most frequent complication encountered was superficial wound infection, and many of the major complications were related to small-bowel obstruction and atelectasis. The incidence of complications was significantly lower in patients operated on during the last 6 years of the study (1987–1992). The complication rate was lower in patients who underwent modified unilateral procedures than in those who had bilateral dissections. The ejaculation rate of patients undergoing nervesparing procedures was 98%. This study reinforces the conclusion that primary retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection is an operation yielding minimal morbidity and no long-standing effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Donohue JP, Thornhill JA, Foster RS, Rowland RG, Bihrle R (1993) Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical stage A non-seminomatous germ cell testis cancer. Br J Urol 71:326

    Google Scholar 

  2. Motzer RJ, Bosl GJ (1993) Role of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II non-seminoma germ cell testicular tumors. Urol Clin North Am 20:111

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sogani PC, Fair WR (1988) Surveillance alone in the treatment of clinical stage I non-seminoma germ cell tumors of the testis. Semin Urol 6:53

    Google Scholar 

  4. Read G, Stenning MH, Cullen MH, Parkinson MC, Horwich A, Kaye SB, Cook PA (1992) Medical Research Council prospective study of surveillance for stage I testicular teratomy. J Clin Oncol 10:1762

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donohue JP, Rowland RG (1981) Complications of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J Urol 125:338

    Google Scholar 

  6. Donohue JP (1990) Complications of lymph node dissections. In: Marshall F (ed) Urological complications. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, pp 384–401

    Google Scholar 

  7. Donohue JP, Zachary JM, Maynard SD (1982) Distribution of nodal metastases of non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. J Urol 128:315

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weisbach L, Bodefled E (1982) Localization of solitary and multiple metastases in stage II non-seminoma germ cell tumors as a basis for a modified staging lymph node dissection in stage I. J Urol 138:77

    Google Scholar 

  9. Donohue JP (1993) Nerve sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testis cancer. Eur Urol 23 [Suppl 2]:44

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cannon WB, Kaplan HS, Dorkman RF, Nelsen TS (1975) Staging laparotomy with splenectomy in Hodgkin's disease. Surg Annu 7:103

    Google Scholar 

  11. Slavin R, Nelsen TS (1973) Complication from staging laparotomy for Hodgkin's disease. Natl Cancer Inst Monog 36:457

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sago AL, Ball TP, Novicki DE (1979) Complications of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Urology 13:241

    Google Scholar 

  13. Babaian RJ, Bracken RB, Johnson DE (1981) Complications of transabdominal retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Urology 17:126

    Google Scholar 

  14. Skinner DG, Melamud E, Leiskovsky G (1982) Complications of thoracoabdominal lymph node dissection. J Urol 127:1107

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jewett MAS, Wesley JT (1991) Early and late complications of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in testis cancer. Can J Surg 34:368

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bihrle R, Donohue JP, Foster RS (1988) Complications of retroperitoneal lymph node dissections. Urol Clin North Am 15:237

    Google Scholar 

  17. Donohue JP (1977) Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy: the anterior approach including bilateral suprarenal hilar dissection. Urol Clin North Am 4:509

    Google Scholar 

  18. Donohue JP, Foster RS, Rowland RG, Bihrle R, Jones J, Geier G (1990) Nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy with preservation of ejaculation. J Urol 144:287

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lowe B (1993) Surveillance versus nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in stage I nonseminoma germ cell tumors. Urol Clin North Am 20:75

    Google Scholar 

  20. Boyer M, Raghavan D (1992) Toxicity of treatment of germ cell tumors. Semin Oncol 19:128

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baniel, J., Foster, R.S., Rowland, R.G. et al. Complications of primary retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection for low-stage testicular cancer. World J Urol 12, 139–142 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192272

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192272

Keywords

Navigation