Skip to main content
Log in

Identified muscle fibers in a crab

I. Characteristics of excitatory and inhibitory neuromuscular transmission

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    A set of 10 superficial fibers is described for the closer muscle of the crabEriphia spinifrons. The fibers are found in identical positions from one preparation to the next.

  2. 2.

    According to innervation pattern and neuromuscular responses, the identified fibers can be classified in 4 major groups (I to IV). They are representative for the remaining fibers comprising the closer muscle.

  3. 3.

    All muscle fibers of the closer are innervated by the fast excitor. Only the fibers also innervated by the slow excitor are further innervated by the common inhibitor (CI). CI innervation seems to be linked to the distribution of the slow axon.

  4. 4.

    CI is most effective in fibers 2, 3 and 4 (group I fibers) through post- and mainly presynaptic mechanisms. Presynaptic inhibition drastically reduces excitatory transmission at the terminals of both the slow and the fast axon. Fiber 5 (group II fibers) receive(s) only postsynaptic inhibition.

  5. 5.

    The strength of presynaptic inhibition varies at different junctions along a given muscle fiber from about 20 to almost 100%.

  6. 6.

    Excitatory and inhibitory nerve terminal potentials were recorded allowing determination of the time relationship for optimal presynaptic inhibition. Inhibition reaches its optimum when the action potential in the inhibitory ending precedes that in the excitatory terminal by 5 to 8 ms. Presynaptic inhibition shows a long persistance. Half maximal inhibition is present when action potentials in the inhibitory endings occur 18 to 30 ms before those in the excitatory endings.

  7. 7.

    CI plays an important role in the division of labor among muscle fibers receiving identical excitatory input. Fibers of group I (tonic fibers) are selectively inhibited and prevented from participation in tension generation during walking of the crab. During locomotion mainly group II fibers are active. A very large proportion of muscle fibers (group III and IV) appears not to be activated during slow walking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CI :

common inhibitor

FCE :

fast closer excitor

SCE :

slow closer excitor

ejp :

excitatory junction potential

entp :

excitatory nerve terminal potential

ijp :

inhibitory junction potential

intp :

inhibitory nerve terminal potential

References

  • Atwood HL (1963) Differences in muscle fibre properties as a factor in ‘fast’ and ‘slow’ contraction inCarcinus. Comp Biochem Physiol 10:17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood HL (1965) Excitation and inhibition in crab muscle fibres. Comp Biochem Physiol 16:409–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood HL (1973) Crustacean motor units. In: Stein RB et al. (eds) Control of posture and locomotion. Plenum Press, New York, pp 87–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood HL (1976) Organization and synaptic physiology of crustacean neuromuscular systems. Prog Neurobiol 7:219–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood HL, Dorai Raj BS (1964) Tension development and membrane responses in phasic and tonic muscle fibers of a crab. J Cell Comp Physiol 64:55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood HL, Hoyle G (1965) A further study of the paradox phenomenon of crustacean muscle. J Physiol 181:225–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood HL, Parnas I (1968) Synaptic transmission in crustacean muscles with dual motor innervation. Comp Biochem Physiol 27:381–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood HL, Hoyle G, Smyth T (1965) Mechanical and electrical responses of single innervated crab muscle fibres. J Physiol 180:449–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood HL, Parnas I, Wiersma CAG (1967) Inhibition in crustacean phasic neuromuscular systems. Comp Biochem Physiol 20:163–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne D, Rathmayer W (1981) On the function of the common inhibitory neurone in the walking legs of the crab,Eriphia spinifrons. J Comp Physiol 143:111–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudel J, Kuffler SW (1961) Presynaptic inhibition at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol 155:543–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatt P, Katz B (1963) The effect of inhibitory nerve impulses on crustacean muscle fibre. J Physiol 121:374–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer L, Florey E (1982) Postsynaptic potential and postsynaptic current in muscle fibres with large time constant. Epsp amplitude is independent of membrane resistance. Gen Pharmacol 13:477–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle G (1967) Specificity of muscle. In: Wiersma CAG (ed) Invertebrate nervous systems. University Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 151–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle G, Wiersma CAG (1958) Excitation at neuromuscular junctions in Crustacea. J Physiol 143:402–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang F, Sutterlin A, Prosser CL (1970) Electrical and mechanical properties of the closer muscle of the Alaskan king crabParalithodes camtschatica. Comp Biochem Physiol 32:615–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathmayer W, Florey E (1974) Presynaptic inhibition of long duration at crab neuromuscular junctions. Pflügers Arch 347:77–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens TJ, Atwood HL (1975) Dual inhibitory control in crab leg muscles. J Comp Physiol 99:211–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma CAG, Ripley SH (1952) Innervation patterns of crustacean limbs. Physiol Comp Oecol 2:391–405

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rathmayer, W., Erxleben, C. Identified muscle fibers in a crab. J. Comp. Physiol. 152, 411–420 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00606246

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00606246

Keywords

Navigation