Summary
-
1.
The angular sensitivity of blowfly photoreceptors was measured in detail at wavelengthsλ=355, 494 and 588 nm.
-
2.
The measured curves often showed numerous sidebands, indicating the importance of diffraction by the facet lens.
-
3.
The shape of the angular sensitivity profile is dependent on wavelength. The main peak of the angular sensitivities at the shorter wavelengths was flattened. This phenomenon as well as the overall shape of the main peak can be quantitatively described by a wave-optical theory using realistic values for the optical parameters of the lensphotoreceptor system.
-
4.
At a constant response level of 6 mV (almost dark adapted), the visual acuity of the peripheral cells R1-6 is at longer wavelengths mainly diffraction limited, while at shorter wavelengths the visual acuity is limited by the waveguide properties of the rhabdomere.
-
5.
Closure of the pupil narrows the angular sensitivity profile at the shorter wavelengths. This effect can be fully described by assuming that the intracellular pupil progressively absorbs light from the higher order modes.
-
6.
In light-adapted cells R1-6 the visual acuity is mainly diffraction limited at all wavelengths.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrell KF, Pask C (1979) Optical fibre excitation by lenses. Opt Acta 26: 91–108
Beersma DGM (1979) Spatial characteristics of the visual field of flies. Thesis Groningen
Beersma DGM, Hoenders BJ, Huiser AMJ, Toorn P van (1982) Refractive index of the fly rhabdomere. J Opt Soc Am 72: 583–588
Boschek CB (1971) On the fine structure of the peripheral retina and lamina ganglionaris of the fly,Musca domestica. Z Zellforsch 118: 369–409
Franceschini N (1975) Sampling of the visual environment by the compound eye of the fly: fundamentals and applications. In: Snyder AW, Menzel R (eds) Photoreceptor optics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 98–125
Hardie RC (1979) Electrophysiological analysis of fly retina. I: Comparative properties of Rl-6 and R7 and 8. J Comp Physiol 129: 19–33
Hateren JH van (1984) Waveguide theory applied to optically measured angular sensitivities of fly photoreceptors. J Comp Physiol A 154: 761–771
Hengstenberg R (1971) Das Augenmuskelsystem der StubenfliegeMusca domestica. I: Analyse der ‘clock spikes’ und ihrer Quellen. Kybernetik 9: 56–77
Horridge GA, Mimura K, Hardie RC (1976) Fly photoreceptors. III: Angular sensitivity as a function of wavelength and the limits of resolution. Proc R Soc Lond B 194: 151–177
Kirschfeld K, Franceschini N (1969) Ein Mechanismus zur Steuerung des Lichtflusses in den Rhabdomeren des Komplexauges vonMusca. Kybernetik 6: 13–22
Kirschfeld K, Snyder AW (1975) Waveguide mode effects, birefringence and dichroism in fly photoreceptors. In: Snyder AW, Menzel R (eds) Photoreceptor optics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 56–77
Kuiper JW (1966) On the image formation in a single ommatidium of the compound eye in Diptera. In: Bernhard CG (ed) The functional organization of the compound eye. Pergamon Press, Oxford New York, pp 35–50
Marcuse D (1974) Theory of dielectric optical waveguides. Academic Press, New York
Muijser H (1979) A micro-electrode amplifier with an infinite resistance current source for intracellular measurements of membrane potential and resistance changes under current clamp. Experientia 35: 912–913
Pask C, Barrell KF (1980a) Photoreceptor optics I: Introduction to formalism and excitation in a lens-photoreceptor system. Biol Cybern 36: 1–8
Pask C, Barrell KF (1980b) Photoreceptor optics II: Application to angular sensitivity and other properties of a lens-photoreceptor system. Biol Cybern 36: 9–18
Pask C, Snyder AW (1975) Angular sensitivity of lens-photoreceptor systems. In: Snyder AW, Menzel R (eds) Photoreceptor optics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 159–166
Razmjoo S, Hamdorf K (1976) Visual sensitivity and the variation of total pigment content in the blowfly photoreceptor membrane. J Comp Physiol 105: 279–286
Scholes J (1969) The electrical responses of the retinal receptors and the lamina in the visual system of the flyMusca. Kybernetik 6: 149–162
Schwemer J (1979) Molekulare Grundlagen der Photorezeption bei der SchmeissfliegeCalliphora erythrocephala Meig. Habilitationsschrift, Ruhr Universität, Bochum
Schwemer J (1983) Pathways of visual pigment regeneration in fly photoreceptor cells. Biophys Struct Mech 9: 287–298
Smakman JGJ, Pijpker BA (1983) An analog-digital feedback system for measuring photoreceptor properties with an equal response method. J Neurosci Meth 8: 365–373
Smola U, Wunderer H (1981) Fly rhabdomeres twist in vivo. J Comp Physiol 142: 43–49
Snyder AW, Horridge GA (1972) The optical function of changes in the medium surrounding the cockroach rhabdom. J Comp Physiol 81: 1–8
Snyder AW, Menzel R (eds) (1975) Photoreceptor optics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Stavenga DG (1975) Optical qualities of the fly eye. An approach from the side of geometrical, physical and waveguide optics. In: Snyder AW, Menzel R (eds) Photoreceptor optics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 126–144
Stavenga DG (1979) Pseudopupils of compound eyes. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates (Handbook of sensory physiology vol. VII/6A). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 357–439
Streck P (1972) Der Einfluss des Schirmpigments auf das Sehfeld einzelner Sehzellen der FliegeCalliphora erythrocephala Meig. Z Vergl Physiol 76: 372–402
Vogt K, Kirschfeld K, Stavenga DG (1982) Spectral effects of the pupil in fly photoreceptors. J Comp Physiol 146: 145–152
Washizu Y, Burkhardt D, Streck D (1964) Visual field of single retinula cells and interommatidial inclination in the compound eye of the blowflyCalliphora erythrocephala. Z Vergl Physiol 48: 413–428
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smakman, J.G.J., van Hateren, J.H. & Stavenga, D.G. Angular sensitivity of blowfly photoreceptors: intracellular measurements and wave-optical predictions. J. Comp. Physiol. 155, 239–247 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612641
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612641