Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A computer simulation study of normal and abnormal hip joint contact pressure

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The contact pressure on 112 normal hip joints and 66 acetabular dysplastic hip joints was analysed using a three-dimensional rigid body spring model. Geometric models were made from conventional anteroposterior radiographs, with the assumption that the acetabular surface was spherical. In normal hips, the distribution of contact pressure was almost even over the joint surface, and the maximum contact pressure was relatively low. However, in a dysplastic hip joint, the pressure was concentrated on the anterolateral edge of the acetabulum and increased enormously not only with the reduction in lateral coverage but also with the reduction in the anterior coverage of the acetabulum. This result indicates that a three-dimensional analysis is indispensable for estimating the mechanical effect on acetabular cartilage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. An KN, Himeno S, Tsumura H, Kawai T, Chao EYS (1990) Pressure distribution on articular surface: application to muscle force determination and joint stability evaluation. J Biomech 23:1013–1020

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crowninshield RD, Johnston RC, Andrews JG, Brand RA (1978) A biomechanical investigation of the human hip. J Biomech 11:75–85

    Google Scholar 

  3. Greenwald AS, O'Connor JJ (1971) The transmission of load through the human hip joint. J Biomech 4:507–528

    Google Scholar 

  4. Himeno S, Chao EYS, Tsumura H, Hsu RWW, Sim FH, Conventry MB (1988) Plateau pressure distribution before and after knee osteotomy. Presented to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Atlanta

  5. Hodge WA, Fijan RS, Carlson KL, Burgess RG, Harris WH, Mann RW (1986) Contact pressures in the human hip joint measured in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:2879–2883

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hodge WA, Carlson KL, Fijan RS, Burgess RG, Riley PO, Mann R, Harris WH (1989) Contact pressure from an instrumented hip endoprothesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 71:1378–1385

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horii E, Gracia-Elias M, An KN, Bishop AT, Cooney WP, Linscheid RL, Chao EYS (1990) Effect on force transmission across the carpus in procedures used to treat Kienbock's disease. J Hand Surg [Am] 15:393–340

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kawai T, Takeuchi N (1981) A discrete method of limit analysis with simplified elements. American Society Civil Engineers, International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering New York

  9. Klaue K, Wallin A, Ganz R (1988) CT evaluation of coverage and congruency of the hip prior to osteotomy. Clin Orthop 232:15–25

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kummer B (1969) Die Beanspruchung des menschlichen Hüftgelenks. I. Allgemeine Problematic. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch 127:277–285

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kummer B (1986) Biomechanische Grundlagen der Statik des Hüftgelenks. Z Orthop 124:179–187

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kummer B (1991) Die Klinische Relevanz biomechanischer Analysen der Hüftregion. Z Orthop 129:285–294

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maquet PGJ (1985) Biomechanic of the hip. Springer, New York, pp 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murphy SB, Kijewsky PK, Millis MB, Harless A (1990) Acetabular dysplasia in the adolescent and young adult. Clin Orthop 261:214–223

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pauwels F (1935) Der Schenkelhalsbruch, ein mechanisches Problem, Grundlagen des Heilungsvorganges, Prognose und kausale Therapie, Z Orthop Chir Suppl 63:1–138

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rushfeldt PD, Mann RW, Harris WH (1981) Improved techniques for measuring in vitro. The geometry and pressure distribution in the human acetabulum 2. Instrumented endoprosthesis measurement of articular surface pressure distribution. J Biomech 14:315–323

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rydell NW (1966) Forces acting on the femoral head prosthesis. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 88:1–132

    Google Scholar 

  18. Seireg A, Arvikar RJ (1975) The prediction of muscular load sharing and joint forces in the lower extremities during walking. J Biomech 8:89–102

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wiberg G (1939) Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint. Acta Chir Scand 83 [Suppl 58]:7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Johns Hopkins Orthopaedic Surgery, Good Samaritan Hospital, Biomechanics Laboratory, 5601 Loch Raven Blvd. 4th Floor North, 21239, Baltimore, MD, USA

    E. Genda

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan

    E. Genda, Y. Hasegawa & T. Miura

  3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saiseikai Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

    N. Konishi

Authors
  1. E. Genda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Konishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. Hasegawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. Miura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Genda, E., Konishi, N., Hasegawa, Y. et al. A computer simulation study of normal and abnormal hip joint contact pressure. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114, 202–206 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00444263

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00444263

Keywords

Search

Navigation