Skip to main content
Log in

Topical glutaraldehyde-percutaneous penetration and skin irritation

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To investigate the safety of the topical application of glutaraldehyde to the ankle and heel of man, the in vitro penetration of glutaraldehyde in a 10% aqueous solution through isolated human thin stratum corneum (chest and abdomen), isolated human epidermis (abdominal), and human thick stratum corneum (blister tops from the sole) was determined 1 h after application. Under these conditions, glutaraldehyde did not penetrate thick stratum corneum, while 2.8%–4.4% of the applied dose penetrated the isolated epdermis, and 3.3%–13.8% of the applied dose penetrated thin stratum corneum. An 8-week irritancy test was conducted by applying a 10% aqueous solution of glutaraldehyde to the ankle and heel area of 12 volunteers. Irritation and one case of sensitization resulted from glutaraldehyde application to areas of thin stratum corneum (anterior ankle) but not from applications to thick stratum corneum (medial, posterior, and lateral heel and posterior ankle), which may be a privileged site with respect to glutaraldehyde sensitivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Comaish S (1973) Glutaraldehyde lowers skin friction and enhances skin resistance to acute friction injury. Acta Derum Venereol (Stockh) 53:455–460

    Google Scholar 

  2. DesGroseilliers JP, Prisson P (1974) Localized epidermolysis bullosa: Report of two cases and evaluation of therapy with glutaraldehyde. Arch Dermatol 109:70–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Feldmann RJ, Maibach HI (1967) Regional variation in percutaneous penetration of 14C cortisol in man. J Invest Dermatol 48:181–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon BI, Maibach HI (1969) Eccrine anhidrosis due to glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, and iontophoresis. J Invest Dermatol 53:436–439

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon HH (1975) Pitted keratolysis, forme fruste: a review and new therapies. Cutis 15:54–58

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grand LV (1974) A further look at the treatment of onychomycosis with topical glutaraldehyde. J Am Podiatry Assoc 64:158–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hyat MA (1970) Principles and techniques of electron microscopy, 1st edn. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jordon WP, Dahl MV, Albert HL (1972) Contact dermatitis from glutaraldehyde. Arch Dermatol 105:94–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Juhlin L, Hansson H (1968) Topical glutaraldehyde for plantar hyperhidrosis. Arch Dermatol 97:327–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kligman AM, Christophers E (1963) Preparation of isolated sheets of stratum corneum. Arch Dermatol 88:702–705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Korn AH, Filachhione EM (1967) The direct determination of bound glutaraldehyde in glutaraldehyde-tanned collagen. Am Leather Chem Assoc J 67:507–522

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maibach HI, Prystowsky SD (1977) Glutaraldehyde (Pentanedial) allergic contact dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 113:170–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maibach HI, Feldmann RJ, Milby TH, Serat WF (1971) Regional variation in percutaneous penetration in man: pesticides. Arch Environ Health 23:208–211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reifenrath WG, Robinson PB (1982) In vitro skin evaporation and penetration characteristics of mosquito repellents. J Pharm Sci 71:1014–1018

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanderson KV, Cronin E (1968) Glutaraldehyde and contact dermatitis. Br Med J [Clin Res] 3:802

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scheuplein RJ (1978) Site variations in diffusion and permeability. In: Jarrett A (ed) The physiology and pathophysiology of the skin. Academic Press, New York, pp 1731–1732

    Google Scholar 

  17. Suringa DWR (1970) Treatment of superficial onychomycosis with topically applied glutaraldehyde: a preliminary study. Arch Dermatol 102:163–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Swarbrick J, Lee G, Brom J (1982) Drug permeation through human skin. I. Effect of storage conditions of skin. J Invest Dermatol 18:63–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Young JF (1967) Humidity control in the laboratory using salt solutions: a review. J Appl Chem 17:241–245

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense (AR 360-5). The citation of trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such items. Human subjects participated in these studies after giving their free and informed consent. The investigators adhered to AR 70-25 and USAMRDC Reg. 70-25 in the treatment of the volunteers used in this research

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reifenrath, W.G., Prystowsky, S.D., Nonomura, J.H. et al. Topical glutaraldehyde-percutaneous penetration and skin irritation. Arch Dermatol Res 277, 242–244 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00404324

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00404324

Key words

Navigation