Skip to main content
Log in

Sperm count in ejaculates and after sperm selection with discontinuous percoll gradient centrifugation technique, as a prognostic index of IVF outcome

  • Originals
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Success of IVF with low sperm count will depend on the retrieval of the maximum number of normal motile sperms, and this makes the selection of an appropriate technique critical. Various in vitro methods have been developed for selecting human sperm cells. Sperm selection using percoll gradient has been reported to yield upto 60% motile and morphologically normal spermatozoa from a normal semen sample. In this study, we have attempted to determine a possible relationship between sperm count in ejaculates before and after selection with percoll gradient centrifugation on one hand, and fertilization, cleavage and pregnancy rates in an IVF program on the other. With increased sperm count at the time of IVF treatment using selected sperm, we observed higher fertilization, cleavage and gestation rates. In conclusion, sperm concentration before and after selection with percoll may be considered a prognostic parameter for the determination of fertilization potential and pregnancy rates in an IVF program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acosta AA, Oehinger S, Morshedi MS, Wanson RJ, Scott R, Irianni F (1988) Assisted reproduction in the diagnosis and treatment of the male factor. Obstet Gynecol Sury 44:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen NC, Herbert CM, Maxson WS, Rogers BJ, Diamond MP, Wentz AC (1985) Intrauterine insemination: a critical review. Fertil Steril 44:569–580

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Battin D, Vargyas JM, Sato F, Brown J, Marrs RP (1985) The correlation between in vitro fertilization of human oocytes and semen profiles. Fertil Steril 44:835–838

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brasch JG, Rawlins R, Tarchala S, Radwanska E (1994) The relationship between total motile sperm count and the success of intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 62:150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Braude PR, Bolton VN (1984) The preparation of spermatozoa for in vitro fertilization by bouyant density centrifugation. In: Feichtinger W, Kemeter P (eds) Recent progress in human in vitro fertilization. Confere, Palermo, p 125

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen J, Edwards R, Fehilly C, Fischel S, Hewith J, Purdy J, Rowland G, Steptoe P, Webster J (1985) In vitro fertilization: a treatment of male infertility. Fertil Steril 43:422

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dixon WJ (1993) BMDP statistical software manual vol 1, 2. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dravland JE, Mortimer D (1985) A simple discontinous, percoll gradients procedure for washing human spermatozoa. IRCS Med Sci 13:16

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duncan WW, Glew MJ, Wang XJ, Flaherty SP, Mathews CD (1993) Prediction of in vitro fertilization rates from semen variables. Fertil Steril 59:1233–1238

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Edward RG, Fischel S, Cohen J, Fehilly CB, Purdy J, Slater S, Steptoe P, Webster J (1984) Factors influencing the success of IVF for alleviation of human infertility. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 1(1):3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisch B, Kaplan-Kracier R, Amit S, Zuckerman Z, Ovadia J, Tadir Y (1990) The relationship between sperm parameters and fertilizing capacity in vitro: a predictive role of swimup migration. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 7:38–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Foster MS, Smith WD, Smith WI, Berger RE, Karp LE, Stenchever MA (1983) Selection of human spermatozoa according to their relative motility and their inter raction with zonafree hamster eggs. Fertil Steril 40:655

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grow D, Oehninger S, Seltman HJ, Tomer JP, Swanson RJ, Kruger TF, Mausher SJ (1994) Sperm morphology as diagnosed by strict criteria: probing the impact, of teratozoospermia on fertilization and pregnancy outcome in a large in vitro fertilization population. Fertil Steril 62:559–567

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Horvath PM, Bohree M, Schelden RM, Kemmann E (1989) The relationship of sperm parameters to cycle fecundity in superovulated women undergoing intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 52:288–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hyne RV, Stojanoff A, Clarke GN, Lopata A, Johnson WIH (1986) Pregnancy from in vitro fertilization of human eggs after separation of motile spermatozoa by density gradient centrifugation. Fertil Steril 45:93

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanwar KC, Yanagimachi R, Lopata A (1979) Effect of human seminal plasma on fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 31:321

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lessley BA, Garner DL (1983) Isolation of motile spermatozoa by density gradient centrifugation in percoll. Gamete Res 7:49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. MacLeod J (1951) Semen quality in 1000 men of known fertility and in 800 cases of infertile mariage. Fertil Steril 2:115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mahadevan MM, Trounson AO (1984) The influence of seminal characteristics on the success rate of human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 42:400

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Makler A (1980) The improved ten-micrometer chamber for rapid sperm count and motility evaluation. Fertil Steril 33:337

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Matson PL, Troup SA, Lowe B, Ibrahim ZHZ, Burslem RW, Lieberman BA (1989) Fertilization of human oocytes in vitro by spermatozoa from oligospermic and normospermic men. Int G Androl 12:117–123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Oehninger S, Acosta AA, Kruger TF, Veeck LL, Flood J, Jones HW (1988) Failure of fertilization in in vitro fertilization: the “occult” male factor. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 5:181–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thanki KH, Gagliard CL, Schmidt C (1992) Poor in vitro fertilization outcome with semen yielding low sperm density “swim-up” is not because of altered sperm motion parameter. Fertil Steril 58:770–775

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Uem JFHM, Acosta AA, Swanson RJ, Mayer J, Ackerman S, Burkman LJ et al. (1985) Male factor evaluation in in vitro fertilization; Norfolk experience. Fertil Steril 44: 375–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. World health organization (1992) Mannual for the examination of human semen cervical mucus interaction, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammadeh, M.E., Stieber, M., Haidl, G. et al. Sperm count in ejaculates and after sperm selection with discontinuous percoll gradient centrifugation technique, as a prognostic index of IVF outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 259, 125–131 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505320

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505320

Key words

Navigation