Skip to main content
Log in

Image analysis combined with quantitative cytochemistry

Results and instrumental developments for cancer diagnosis

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Histochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper describes the application of image analysis combined with a quantitative staining method for the analysis of cervical specimens. The image analysis is carried out with the Leyden Television Analysis System, LEYTAS, of which two versions are described. LEYTAS-1 as well as LEYTAS-2 have both been designed with a high degree of flexibility and interaction facilities. A much wider range of image analysis programs is however, possible with LEYTAS-2, enabling many applications. LEYTAS-1, the earlier version, consists of a Leitz microscope with automated functions, a TV camera, the Texture Analysis System (TAS, Leitz), a four-bit grey value memory and a minicomputer (PDP 11/23). Using this instrumentation 1,500 cervical smears prepared from cell suspensions and stained with acriflavin-Feulgen-Sits have been analysed in a completely automated procedure. Image transformations working in parallel on entire fields, have been used for cell selection and artefact rejection. Resulting alarms, consisting of selected single cells and non-rejected artefacts are stored in the grey value memory, which is displayed on a TV monitor. This option allows visual interaction after the machine diagnosis has been made. The machine diagnosis was correct in 320 out 321 specimens with a severe dysplasia or more serious lesion. The false positive rate in 561 morphologically negative specimens (normal and inflammation) was 16% (machine diagnosis). Visual interaction by subtracting the visually recognized false alarms from the total number of alarms reduces the false positive rate to 11%. In LEYTAS-2, which is based on LEYTAS-1 studies, the microscope is equipped with a new type of objective, enabling the analysis of microscope fields, which are four times as large as in LEYTAS-1. The image analysis part consists of the Modular Image Analysis Computer (MIAC, Leitz) and for alarm storage an eight-bit grey value processor is used. Comparison with LEYTAS-1 shows that cell selection capacities are similar and that the speed is four times higher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cornelisse CJ, Driel-Kulker AMJ van (1985) DNA image cytometry on machine-selected breast cancer cells and a comparison between flow cytometry and scanning cytometry. Cytometry 6:471–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Driel-Kulker AMJ van, Ploem JS (1982) The use of LEYTAS in analytical and quantitative cytology. IEEE Trans BME 29:92–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Driel-Kulker AMJ van, Ploem-Zaaijer JJ, Zwan-van der Zwan M van der, Tanke HJ (1980) A preparation technique for exfoliated and aspirated cells allowing different staining procedures. Anal Quant Cytol 2:243–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Driel-Kulker AMJ van, Mesker WE, Velzen MCM van, Tanke HJ, Feichtinger J, Ploem JS (1985) Preparation of monolayer smears from paraffin-embedded tissue for image cytometry. Cytometry 6:268–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyarts-Veldstra L, Driel-Kulker AMJ van, Ploem-Zaaijer JJ, Mcyer F, Ploem JS (1983) LEYTAS analysis of cytological specimens: the results in thousand cervical smears. Microsc Acta (Suppl) 6:147–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Husain OAN, Butler EB, Evans DMD, McGregor JE, Yule R (1974) Quality control in cervical cytology. J Clin Pathol 27:935–944

    Google Scholar 

  • Husain OAN, Page-Roberts BA, Millet JA (1978) A sample preparation for automated cervical cancer screening. Acta Cytol 22:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer F (1979) Iterative image transformations for automatic screening of cervical smears. J Histochem Cytochem 27:128–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearse AGE (ed) (1980) Histochemistry. Theoretical and applied. Vol 1: Preparative and optical technology. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh London New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploem JS (1985a) Preparation and staining of specimens for automated image analysis in cytology. Symposium on Morphometry, Stereology and Image Analysis in Cancer Cytology and Histopathology, Villejuif 14–17 October. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploen JS (1985b) New instrumentation for sensitive image analysis of fluorescence in cells and tissues. In: Lansing Taylor D, Waggoner AS, Lanni F, Murphi RF, Birge R (eds) Fluorescence in the biological sciences. Alan R Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploem JS, Verwoerd N, Bonnet J, Koper G (1979) An automated microscope for quantitative cytology combining television image analysis and stage scanning microphotometry. J Histochem Cytochem 27:136–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploem-Zaaiier JJ, Beyer-Boon ME, Leyte-Veldstra L, Ploem JS (1979) Cytofluorometric and cytophotometric DNA measurements of cervical smears stained using a new bi-color method. In: Pressman NJ, Wied GL (eds) The automation of cancer cytology and cell image analysis. Tutorials of Cytology, Chicago, pp 225–235

  • Ringsted J, Amtrup F, Asklund C, Baunsgaard P, Christensen HE, Hansen I, Jakobsen C, Jensen NK, Moesner J, Rasmussen J, Reintoft I, Rolschau J (1978) Reliability of histo-pathological diagnosis of squamous epithelial changes of the uterine cervix. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Sect A 86:273–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra J (ed) (1982) Image analysis and mathematical morphology. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeulders AWM (1983) Pattern analysis of cervical specimens. Thesis, University of Leiden

  • Smeulders AWM, Vossepoel AM, Vrolijk J, Ploem JS, Cornelisse CJ (1980) Some shape parameters for cell recognition. In: Gelsema ES, Kanal LN (eds) Pattern recognition in practice. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 131–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka N, Ikeda H, Ueno T, Mukawa A, Kamitsuma K (1979) Field test and experimental use of CYBEST model 2 for practical gynecologic mass screening. Anal Quant Cytol 1:122–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanke HJ, Ploem JS, Jonas U (1982) Kombinierte Durchflusszytophotometrie und Bildanalyse zur automatisierten Zytologie von Blasenepithel und Prostata. Akt Urol 13:109–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanke HJ, Cornelisse CJ, Ingen EM van, Ploem JS (1978) Acriflavine-Feulgen-Stilbene: A combined DNA-protein staining procedure. Acta Histochem (Suppl) 20:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrolijk J, Pearson PL, Ploem JS (1980) “LEYTAS”, a system for the processing of microscopic images. Anal Quant Cytol 2:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahniser DJ, Oud PS, Raaijmakers MCT, Vooys GP, Walle RT van de (1980) Field test results using the BioPEPR cervical smear prescreening system. Cytometry 1:200–204

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

In honour of Prof. P. van Duijn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ploem, J.S., van Driel-Kulker, A.M.J., Goyarts-Veldstra, L. et al. Image analysis combined with quantitative cytochemistry. Histochemistry 84, 549–555 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00482990

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00482990

Keywords

Navigation