Skip to main content
Log in

Intelligence differences and conceptual judgement

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Studies of gifted children were recently reviewed by Vernon, Adamson, and Vernon (1977). These studies can be said to fall into three main categories, those concerned with the identification and education of such children, e.g., Ogilvie (1970), the psychometrically analysed structure of their abilities, e.g., Guilford (1967) and the factors contributing to success or creativity among those of high IQ, e.g., Terman (1930), Torrance (1969) and Wallach (1970). Few experimental studies have been attempted in this area despite the current interest in the relationship between intelligence and cognitive processes. The experiments reported here are intended to initiate an exploration of the effect of intelligence differences on the conceptual structure of different groups of children. The task selected as a basis for such an investigation was that developed by Collins and Quillian (1969), and taken further by Schaeffer and Wallace (1970). Pairs of words and pairs of pictures chosen from four hierarchically ordered categories were presented to children of average or of high intelligence for comparative classification. Subjects were asked to say whether or not the two items in a pair belonged to the same or different conceptual categories, and to press buttons accordingly. Despite a marked IQ difference, the two groups did not differ in the speed with which they judged picture pairs to be the ‘same’ or ‘different,’ but the gifted children were significantly faster in judgements based on presented word pairs. Supplementary studies attempted to determine the source of the interaction in terms of perceptual, motor response, or decision functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banks, W.P., Flora, Julianna: Semantic and Perceptual Processes in Symbolic Comparisons. J. Exp. Psychol. (Hum. Percept.) 3, 278–290 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, A.A., Kellas, G.: Reaction Time and Mental Retardation. In: International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, Vol. 3, N.R. Ellis, ed., New York: Academic Press 1968

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkson, G.: An analysis of reaction time in normal and mentally deficient young men: 1. Duration threshold experiment. J. Ment. Defic. Res. 4, 51–58 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.H.: The language-as-a-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 12, 335–359 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.H., Chase, W.G.: On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognit. Psychol. 3, 472–517 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A.M., Quillian, M.R.: Retrieval time from semantic memory. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 8, 240–271 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Donders, F.C.: Proceedings of the Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences. Department of Natural Sciences. Translated by W. G. Koster. (1865). Acta Psychol. 30, 409–411 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P.: Le temps de réaction verbale: 1. Dénomination et lecture. Année Psychol. 64, 21–46 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P.: Motor and verbal reaction times to words and drawings. Psychonom. Sci. 12.6, 235–236 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, R.A., Schwartz, S., Stewart, M.: Individual differences in cognitive processes. J. Educ. Psychol. 69, 9–14 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J.P.: The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw Hill 1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E.: Mechanics and verbal ability. Psychol. Rev. 82, 109–130 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A.R.: Educational Differences. London: Methuen 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettlebeck, T., Lally, M.: Inspection time and measured intelligence. Br. J. Psychol. 67, 17–22 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, E.: Gifted Children in Primary Schools. London: Macmillan 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabbitt, P.M.A.: Times for analysing stimuli and selecting responses. Br. Med. Bull. 27, 259–265 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E.: Cognitive representation of semantic categories. J. Exp. Psychol. (Gen.) 104, 192–233 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, J., Sussman, S.: Educating gifted children. York: Ontario Board of Education 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, B., Wallace, R.: The comparison of word meaning. J. Exp. Psychol. 86, 144–152 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L.M.: Genetic Studies of Genius. Vol. VI: The Promise of Youth. Stanford: Stanford University Press 1930

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E.P.: Curiosity of gifted children: performance on timed and untimed tests of creativity. Gifted Children Quart. 13, 155–158 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B.: Pictorial representations in adults and children. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 31, 397–408 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P.E., Adamson, G., Vernon, D.F.: The Psychology and Education of Gifted Children. London: Methuen 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M.A.: Creativity, In: Manual of Child Psychology, P.H. Mussen, ed., New York: Wiley 1970

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Connor, N., Hermelin, B. Intelligence differences and conceptual judgement. Psychol. Res 41, 91–100 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309426

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309426

Keywords

Navigation