Skip to main content
Log in

Atypical mitotic figures and the mitotic index in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We surveyed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) to quantify the proliferation rate and the presence of normal and atypical mitotic figures. In the cervical tissue specimens of 127 women with CIN, the area with the highest cell proliferation was identified and, at that site, the proliferation rate was assessed by calculating the mitotic index (MI). Lesions with an MI <2 were not considered further. In the area with the highest proliferation rate, 228 mitoses were classified into one of the following groups: normal mitotic figures (NMFs), lag-type mitoses (LTMs) comprising three group metaphases (3GMs), two group metaphases (2GMs) and other lag-type mitoses (OLTMs), multipolar mitoses (MPMs) comprising tripolar mitoses (3PMs) and quadripolar mitoses (4PMs), and other atypical mitotic figures (OAMFs). The median value of the MI increased significantly from 3 in CIN I through 4 in CIN II to 9 in CIN III (P<0.001). The occurrence of the different LTMs was mutually correlated. The frequency of LTMs increased significantly with increasing CIN grade (P<0.001), whereas the frequency of NMFs decreased significantly with increasing CIN grade (P<0.001). The frequency of OAMFs was not related to CIN grade (P=0.94). MPMs were present in low numbers in a minority of the lesions. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (with 95% confidence limits) between the MI and the number of LTMs, OAMFs and NMFs was 0.66 (0.53; 0.75), −0.14 (−0.32; 0.05) and −0.51 (−0.63; −0.35), respectively. Increasing CIN grade is associated with increasing MI, increasing numbers of LTMs, and decreasing numbers of NMFs. MPMs are very rare events in CIN. The abundant presence of OAMFs seems to be independent of CIN grade and MI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson MC, Brown CL, Buckley CH, Fox H, Jenkins D, Lowe DG, Manners BTB, Melcher DH, Robertson AJ, Mells M (1991) Current views on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Clin Pathol 44:969–978

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baak JPA (1990) Mitosis counting in tumors (editorial). Hum Pathol 21:683–685

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bibbo M, Dytch HE, Alenghat E, Bartels PH, Wied GL (1989) DNA ploidy profiles as prognostic indicators in CIN lesions. Am J Clin Pathol 92:261–265

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burger MPM, Hollema H (1993) The reliability of the histologic diagnosis in colposcopically directed biopsies. A plea for LETZ. Int J Gynecol Cancer 3:385–390

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chi CH, Rubio CA, Lagerlof B (1977) The frequency and distribution of mitotic figures in dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. Cancer 39:1218–1223

    Google Scholar 

  6. Claas ECJ, Quint WGV, Pieters WJLM, Burger MPM, Oosterhuis JW, Lindeman J (1992) Human papillomavirus and the three group metaphase as markers of an increased risk for the development of cervical carcinoma. Am J Pathol 140:497–502

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis PSJ, Whitehead R (1981) Mitosis counting. A need for reappraisal. Hum Pathol 12:3–4

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fu YS, Reagan JW, Richart RM (1981) Definition of precursors. Gynecol Oncol 12:S220–231

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gardner MJ, Gardner SB, Winter PD (1991) Confidence interval analysis (CIA) microcomputer program. British Medical Journal, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mourits MJE, Pieters WJLM, Hollema H, Burger MPM (1992) Three group metaphase as a morphological criterion of progressive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167:591–595

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pieters WJLM, Koudstraal J, Ploem-Zaayer JJ, Janssens J, Oosterhuis JW (1992) The three group metaphase is a morphological indicator of high-ploidy cells in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 14:227–232

    Google Scholar 

  12. Poulsen HE, Taylor CW, Sobin LH (1975) Histological typing of female genital tract tumours. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rubio CA (1991) Atypical mitosis in colorectal adenomas. Pathol Res Pract 187:508–513

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Scarpelli DG, Von Haam E (1957) A study of mitosis in cervical epithelium during experimental inflammation and carcinogenesis. Cancer 17:880–885

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tanaka T (1986) Proliferative activity in dysplasia, carcinoma in situ and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Pathol Res Pract 181:531–539

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van Diest PJ, Baak JPA, Matze-Cok P, Wisse-Brekelmans ECM, Van Galen CM, Kurver PHJ, Bellot SM, Fijnheer J, Van Gorp LHM, Kwee WS, Los J, Peterse JL, Ruitenberg HM, Schapers RFM, Schipper MEI, Somsen JG, Willig AWPM, Ariens AT (1992) Reproducibility of mitosis counting in 2,469 breast cancer specimens. Results from the multicenter morphometric mammary carcinoma project. Hum Pathol 23:603–607

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van Driel-Kulker AMJ (1986) Automated image analysis applied to the diagnosis of cervical cancer. Dissertation, University of Grenoble

  18. Wilkinson (1990) SYSTAT: the system for statistics. SYSTAT, Evanston, Ill

    Google Scholar 

  19. Winkler B, Crum C, Fujii T, Ferenzy A, Boon M, Braun L, Lancaster WD, Richart RM (1984) Koilocytotic lesions of the cervix. The relationship of mitotic abnormalities to the presence of papillomavirus antigens and nuclear DNA content. Cancer 53:1081–1087

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Leeuwen, A.M., Burger, P.M., Pieters, W.J.L.M. et al. Atypical mitotic figures and the mitotic index in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Vichows Archiv A Pathol Anat 427, 139–144 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196518

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196518

Key words

Navigation