Skip to main content
Log in

Auditory brainstem response in neonates with asphyxia and intracranial haemorrhage

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Auditory brainstem response (ABR) was used to assess possible brainstem damage in 76 neonates with asphyxia and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). Fifty-eight neonates had ICH, 52 had neonatal asphyxia and 34 of these patients had both. Eighty-nine percent of the patients with neonatal asphyxia showed some abnormal patterns in response, the major one being an increase in the threshold of wave V. In the ICH group, abnormal patterns were observed in 62.5%, among whom the prolongation of the I–V interpeak latency (IPL) and of wave V latency was seen more frequently than the increase of threshold of wave V. In the case of neonatal asphyxia associated with ICH, both the prolongation of the latency and the increase of threshold were observed equally. These abnormalities of ABR were associated with worsening clinical condition and conversely normalized gradually following the improvement of the underlying disease. Especially the I–V IPL, wave V latency and the threshold of wave V could serve as indicators of the treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ABR:

auditory brainstem response

ICH:

intracranial haemorrhage

IPI:

interpeak latency

NICU:

neonatal intensive care unit

AFD:

appropriate-for-date

SFD:

small-for-date

SDH:

subdural haemorrhage

References

  1. Barden TR, Pertzman P (1980) Newborn brain stem auditory evoked responses and perinatal clinical events. Am J Obstet Gynecol 139:912–919

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fawer CL, Dubowitz LMS (1982) Auditory brain stem responses in neurologically normal preterm and fullterm newborn infants. Neuropediatrics 13:200–206

    Google Scholar 

  3. Galambos CS, Galambos R (1975) Brain stem auditory evoked responses in premature infants. J Speech Hear Res 18:456–465

    Google Scholar 

  4. Galambos CS, Galambos R (1979) Brain stem evoked response auditory in newborn hearing screening. Arch Otolaryngol 105:86–90

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grundy BL, Janneta PJ, Procopio PT, Lina A, Boston JR, Doyle E (1982) Intraoperative monitoring of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials. J Neurosurg 57:674–681

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hashimoto I, Ishiyama Y, Tozuka G (1979) Bilaterally recorded brainstem auditory responses. Their asymmetric abnormalities and lesions of the brainstem. Arch Neurol 36:161–167

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hecox K, Galambos R (1974) Brain stem auditory evoked responses in human infants and adults. Arch Otolaryngol 99:30–34

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jewett DL (1970) Volume-conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 28:609–618

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mackay A, Jewett DL (1980) Brain stem auditory evoked response and brain stem compression. Neurosurgery 6:632–638

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marshall RE, Reichert TJ, Kerley SM, Davis H (1980) Auditory function in newborn intensive care unit patients revealed by auditory brain-stem potentials. J Pediatr 96:731–735

    Google Scholar 

  11. Starr A (1976) Auditory brainstem responses in brain death. Brain 99:543–544

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yakovlev PI, Lecours AR (1967) The myelogenetic cycle of regional matulation of the brain. In: Minkowski A (ed) Regional development of the brain in early life. FA Davis, Philadelphia, pp 3–70

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yasuhara, A., Kinoshita, Y., Hori, A. et al. Auditory brainstem response in neonates with asphyxia and intracranial haemorrhage. Eur J Pediatr 145, 347–350 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00439236

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00439236

Key words

Navigation