Skip to main content
Log in

DNA specificity of Escherichia coli deoP1 operator-DeoR repressor recognition

  • Published:
Molecular and General Genetics MGG Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We have studied the importance of the specific DNA sequence of the deo operator site for DeoR repressor binding by introducing symmetrical, single basepair substitutions at all positions in the deo operator and tested the ability of these variants to titrate DeoR in vivo. Our results show that a 16 by palindromic sequence constitutes the deo operator. Positions outside this palindrome (positions ±9, ±10) can be changed without any major effect on DeoR binding. Most of the central 6-8 by of the palindrome (positions ±1, ±2, ± 3) can be substituted with other nucleotides with no or only minor effects on DeoR binding, while changes at position ±4 and ±_5 give a more heterogeneous response. Finally, changes at positions ±6, ± 7 and ±8 severely disrupt DeoR binding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amouyal M, Mortensen L, Buc H, Hammer K (1989) Single and double loop formation when deoR repressor binds to its natural operator sites. Cell 58:545–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Bech L (1991) Regulation of transcription initiation: Characterization of the DeoR repressor and DeoR-DNA interactions. PhD thesis, Uversity of Copenhagen

  • Bremer E, Middendorf A, Martinussen J, Valentin-Hansen P (1990) Analysis of the tsx gene, which encodes a nucleoside-specific channel-forming protein (Tsx) in the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. Gene 96:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton RS (1979) Fusion of the lac genes to the proximal promoters of the deo operon of Escherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol 112:241–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark DJ, Maaløoe O (1967) DNA replication and the division cycle of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 23:99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandanell G (1992) DeoR repression at a distance only weakly responds to changes in interoperator separation and DNA topology. Nuc Acids Res 20:5407–5412

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandanell G, Hammer K (1985) Two operator sites separated by 599 base pairs are required for DeoR repression of the deo operon of Escherichia coli. EMBO J 4:3333–3338

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandanell G, Hammer K (1990) In vivo CRP-CAMP regulation of the deoP1 and deoP2 promoters of E. coli K12. Molecular Genetics (Live Sci Adv) 9:41–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandanell G, Hammer K (1991) deoP1 promoter and operator mutants in Escherichia coli: Isolation and characterization. Mol Microbiol 5:2371–2376

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandanell G, Norris K, Hammer K (1991) Long distance deoR regulation of gene expression in E. coli. Ann New York Acad Sci 646:19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandanell G, Valentin-Hansen P, Løve-Larsen PE, Hammer K (1987) Long-range cooperativity between gene regulatory sequences in a prokaryote. Nature 325:823–826

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis T, Yamada M, Elgort M, Saier MH (1988) Nucleotide sequence of the mannitol (mtl) operon in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 2:405–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Gicquel-Sanzey B, Cossart P (1982) Homologies between different procaryotic DNA-binding regulatory proteins and between their sites of action. EMBO J 1:591–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer K, Dandanell G (1989) The deoR repressor from E. coli and its action in regulation-at-distance. In: Eckstein F, Lilley DMJ (eds) Nucleic acids and molecular biology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin- Heidelberg, pp 79–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer-Jespersen K (1983) Nucleoside catabolism. In: MunchPetersen A (ed) Metabolism of nucleotides, nucleosides and nucleobases in microorganisms. Academic Press, London, pp 203–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston F, Ponnambalam S, Busby S (1987) Binding of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase to a promoter carrying mutations that stop transcription initiation. J Mol Biol 195:745–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Koudelka GB, Harrison SC, Ptashne M (1987) Effect of non-contacted bases on the affinity of 434 operator for 434 repressor and cro. Nature 326:886–888

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriger-Brauer HJ, Braun V (1980) Functions related to the receptor protein specified by the tsx gene of Escherichia coli. Arch Microbiol 124:233–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JH (1972) Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen L, Dandanell G, Hammer K (1989) Purification and characterization of the DeoR repressor of Escherichia coli. EMBO J 8:325–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Munch-Petersen A, Jensen N (1990) Analysis of the regulatory region of the Escherichia coli nupG gene, encoding a nucleosidetransport protein. Eur J Biochem 190:547–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Munch-Petersen A, Mygind B (1983) Transport of nucleic acid precursors. In: Munch-Petersen A (ed) Metabolism of nucleotides, nucleosides and nucleobases in microorganisms. Academic Press, London, pp 259–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Munch-Petersen A, Nygaard P, Hammer-Jespersen K, Fiil N (1972) Mutants constitutive for nucleoside-catabolizing enzymes in Escherichia coli K12. Isolation, characterization and mapping. Eur J Biochem 27:208–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Oskouian B, Stewart GC (1990) Repression and catabolite repression of the lactose operon of Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 172:3804–3812

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Callaghan CH, Morris A, Kirby SM, Shingler AH (1972) Novel method for detection of β-lactamase by using a chromogenic cephalosporin substrate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1:283–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Pabo CO, Sauer RT (1984) Protein-DNA recognition. Ann Rev Biochem 53:293–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponnambalam S, Webster C, Birgham A, Busby S (1986) Transcription initiation of the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoters in the absence of normal — 35 regions sequences. J Biol Chem 261:16043–16048

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooijen RJ van, Vos WM de (1990) Molecular cloning, transcriptional analysis and nucleotide sequence of lacR, a gene encoding the repressor of the lactose phosphotransferase system of Lactococcus lactis. J Biol Chem 165:18499–18503

    Google Scholar 

  • Silhavy TJ, Berman ML, Enquist LW (1984) Experiments with gene fusions. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentin-Hansen P, Aiba H, Schümperli D (1982) The structure of tandem regulatory regions in the deo operon of Escherichia coli K12. EMBO J 1:317–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentin-Hansen P, Albrechtsen B, Larsen JEL (1986) DNA-protein recognition: demonstration of three genetically separated operator elements that are required for the repression of the Escherichia coli deoCABD promoters by the DeoR repressor. EMBO J 5:2015–2021

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by H. Hennecke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammer, K., Bech, L., Hobolth, P. et al. DNA specificity of Escherichia coli deoP1 operator-DeoR repressor recognition. Molec. Gen. Genet. 237, 129–133 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282793

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282793

Key words

Navigation