Summary
Esterase-D phenotypes and in vitro activity have been measured in red blood cells from 258 retinoblastoma patients and 73 unaffected relatives. Individuals with the 1-1 and 2-1 phenotypes showed distributions of enzyme activity which were not significantly different from each other. Individuals with the 2-2 phenotype, however, consistently showed a 25–30% lower level of enzyme activity. These results demonstrate the importance of determining the esterase-D phenotype in individuals with low ESD activity who might otherwise be assumed to carry a chromosome deletion at the esterase-D locus. We have also shown that, in vitro, the ESD enzyme is unstable over relatively short periods of time which, if uncontrolled, can give rise to a large variation in measured enzyme levels. The addition of b-mercaptoethanol to the assay buffer, which stabilises the enzyme, results in more consistent values being obtained within the same ESD phenotype. This feature could account in part for much of the variability in enzyme activity observed between different individuals in other studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bär W, Hani M, Biederman V (1984) Esterase D: simultaneous electrophoretic determination of the three common alloenzymes (ESD 1, 2, 5). Electrophoresis 5:280–281
Benedict WF, Murphree AL, Banerjee A, Spina CA, Sparkes MC, Sparkes R (1983) Patient with 13 chromosome deletion: evidence that the retinoblastoma gene is a recessive cancer gene. Science 219:973–975
Cowell JK, Rutland P, Jay M, Hungerford J (1986) Deletions of the esterase-D locus from a survey of 200 retinoblastoma patients. Hum Genet 72:164–167
Gunther A, Basler M, Henke J, Scheil H-G (1982) Zur Häufigkeit des Alleles EsD5 (Esterase-D, E.C.3.1.1.1) in einer westdeutschen Population (Düsseldorfer Raum). Ärztl Lab 28:355–356
Harris H, Hopkinson DA, Robson EB (1974) The incidence of rare alleles determining electrophoretic variants: data on 43 enzyme loci in man. Ann Hum Genet 37:237–253
Hopkinson DA, Mestriner MA, Cortner J, Harris H (1973) Esterase-D: a new human polymorphism. Ann Hum Genet 37:119–137
Horai S, Matsunaga E (1984) Differential enzyme activities in human esterase D phenotypes. Hum Genet 66:168–170
Martin W (1979) Neue Elektrophoresemethoden zur Darstellung von Serum- und Enzymepolymorphismen: technische Verbesserungen, Hinweis auf weiteres EsD-Allel. Ärztl Lab 25:65–67
Nishigaki I, Itoh T (1984) Isoelectric focusing studies of human red cell esterase D: evidence for polymorphic occurrence of a new allele EsD7 in Japanese. Hum Genet 66:92–95
Nishigaki I, Itoh T, Ogasawara N (1983) Quantitative variations in polymorphic types of human red cell esterase D. Ann Hum Genet 47:187–192
Olaisen B, Sivets A, Jonassen R, Mevag B, Gedde-Dahl T (1981) The EsD polymorphism: further studies of the EsD 2 and EsD 5 allele products. Hum Genet 57:351–353
Papiha SS, Nahar A (1977) The world distribution of the electrophoretic variants of red cell enzyme esterase D. Hum Hered 27:424–432
Scott EM, Wright RC (1978) Purification and substrate specificity of polymorphic forms of esterase D from human erythrocytes. Am J Hum Genet 30:14–18
Sparkes RS, Targum S, Gershon E, Sensabaugh GF, Sparkes MC, Crist M (1979) Evidence for a null allele at the esterase D (E.C. 3. 1. 1.) locus. Hum Genet 46:319–323
Sparkes RS, Sparkes MC, Wilson MG, Towner JW, Benedict WF, Murphree AL, Yunis JJ (1980) Regional assignment of genes for human esterase D and retinoblastoma to chromosome band 13q14. Science 208:1042–1044
Sparkes RS, Murphree AL, Lingua RW, Sparkes MC, Field LL, Funderbuck SJ, Benedict WF (1983) Gene for hereditary retinoblastoma assigned to human chromosome 13 by linkage to esterase D. Science 219:971–973
Vogel F (1979) Genetics of retinoblastoma. Hum Genet 52:1–54
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cowell, J.K., Rutland, P., Jay, M. et al. Effect of the esterase-D phenotype on its in vitro enzyme activity. Hum Genet 74, 298–301 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282552
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282552