Skip to main content
Log in

Detection and multichannel SVD-based filtering of trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials

  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Very weak and noisy trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials (TSEPs) are considered, which are successfully evoked by electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve of 15 patients with endosseous oral implants. As TSEP analysis provides an objective means of assessing neuronal function, it is considered to be a promising tool for investigating tactile sensation through anchoring implants in bone. For this purpose, a study of TSEP signals acquired from patients with endosseous oral implants has been carried out. Since TSEPs are severely contaminated by background ongoing electrical activities of the brain, a methodology is developed for statistically detecting the transient signal (TSEP) in the biological noise (EEG). For nine out of 15 patients, transient signals are detected in the background EEG activity. The TSEPs of these nine patients are subjected to further analysis. A multichannel singular value decomposition (SVD)-based filtering method is applied which successfully separates out the most energetic TSEPs from the background EEG, thereby increasing significantly the SNR of the recorded signals and improving extraction of the characteristic components of the TSEPs. It is shown that the most prominent feature of the TSEP signals for patients with endosseous oral implants is a wave with peak latency between 9 and 15 ms, generally followed by a wave between 25 and 28 ms or 34 and 38 ms for the specific cortical response areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akkin, T., andSaliu, S. (1998): ‘Estimation of evoked potentials using total least squares Prony technique’,Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.,36, pp. 544–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachen, N. I. (1986): ‘Detection of stimulus-related (evoked response) in the activity in the EEG’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,33, (6), pp. 566–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, G. R., Bennett, A. J., andWastell, D. G. (1987): ‘Applications of TSEPs in oral and maxillofacial surgery’,Br. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg.,25, pp. 308–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A. J., Wastell, D. G., Barker, G. R., Blackburn, C. W., andRood, J. P. (1987): ‘Trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials: a review of the literature as applicable to oral dysaesthesias’,Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg.,16, pp. 408–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadzow, J. A. (1988): ‘Signal enhancement—a composite property mapping algorithm’,IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process.,ASSP-36, (1), pp. 49–62

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, F. H. Y., Qiu, W., Lam, F. K., Poon, P. W. F., andLam, M. K. (1998): ‘Evoked potential estimation using modified time-sequenced adaptive filter’,Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.,36, pp. 407–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Deweerd, J. P. C. (1981): ‘A posterior time-varying filtering of averaged evoked potential’,Biol. Cybern.,41, pp. 211–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Doclo, S., Dologlou, I., andMoonen, M. (1998): ‘A novel iterative signal enhancement algorithm for noise reduction in speech’.Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP'98), Sydney, Australia, pp. 1435–1438

  • Dologlou, I., Pesquet, J. C., andSkowronski, J. (1996): ‘Projection based rank reduction algorithms for multichannel modeling and image compression’,Signal Process.,48, pp. 97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagade, O. O., andWastell, D. G. (1990): ‘Trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials: technical parameters, reliability and potential in clinical dentistry’,J. Dent.,18, pp. 137–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findler, G., andFeinsod, M. (1982): ‘Sensory evoked potentials to electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve in humans’,J. Neurosurg.,56, pp. 545–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, K. S. M., Chan, F. H. Y., Lam, F. K., andPoon, P. W. F. (1999): ‘A tracing evoked potential estimator’,Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.,37, pp. 218–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, G., andHusar, P. (1995): ‘Statistical detection of visually evoked potentials’,IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Magazine,July/August, pp. 386–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M. J. (1990): ‘Detecting a transient signal by bispectral analysis’,IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech. Signal Process.,38, pp. 1277

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, R., Van Steenberghe, D., Brånemark, P. I., andRydevik, B. (1998): ‘Evaluation of the psychophysical detection threshold level for vibrotactile and pressure stimulation of prosthetic limbs using bone-anchorage or soft tissue support’ in Jacobs R. (Ed.): ‘Osseoperception’, (K.U. Leuven)

  • Jacobs, R. (ed.) (1998): ‘Osseoperception’, (K.U.Leuven)

  • Jasper, H. H. (1958): ‘The ten twenty electrode system of the international federation’,Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol.,10, pp. 371–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Jemt, T., Chai, J., Harnett, J., Heath, M. R., Hutton, J. E., Johns, R. B., McKenna, S., McNamara, D. C., Van Steenberghe, D., Taylor, R., Watson, R. M., andHermann, I. (1995): ‘A 5 year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants’,Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants,11, pp. 291–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Manolakis, D. G., andProakis, J. G. (1996): ‘Digital signal processing: principles, algorithms and applications, 3rd Ed.’ (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillem, C. D., Aunon, J. I., andYu, K. B. (1985): ‘Signals and noise in evoked brain potentials’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,BME-32, pp. 1012–1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogrel, M. A., Mouhabaty, D., Dodson, T., Rampil, I., andGrecco, M. (1992): ‘Trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials: a normal value study’,J. Dent.,20, pp. 298–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, H., Mittelman, N., andGeva, A. B. (1994): ‘Machine scoring of somatosensory evoked potentials’,Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol.,92, pp. 89–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, D. (1972): ‘Evoked potentials in psychology, sensory physiology and clinical medicine (Wiley, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, D. (1972): ‘Human brain electrophysiology: evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine’ (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam/New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • The Mathworks, Inc., (1999): ‘Matlab®: high-performance numeric computation and visualization software (reference guide)’, Cochituate Place, 24 Prime Park Way, Natick, MA 01760

  • Van Huffel, S. (1993): ‘Enhanced resolution based on minimum variance estimation and exponential data modeling’,Signal Process.,33, pp. 333–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Loven, K., Jacobs, R., Swinnen, A., Van Huffel, S., Van Hees, J., andVan Steenberghe, D. (submitted): ‘Perception through oral osseointegrated implants demonstrated by somatosensory evoked potentials’,Arch. Oral Biol.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Van Huffel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swinnen, A., Van Huffel, S., Van Loven, K. et al. Detection and multichannel SVD-based filtering of trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 38, 297–305 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347050

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347050

Keywords

Navigation