Abstract
Femoral neck anteversion is the torsion of the femoral head with reference to the distal femur. Conventional methods that use cross-sectional computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance or ultrasound images to estimate femoral anteversion have met with several problems owing to the complex three-dimensional (3D) structure of the femur. A 3D imaging method has been developed that virtually measures femoral anteversion on the 3D computer space with continuous CT slices; this 3D method provides more accurate and reliable results than conventional 2D CT measurements. A 3D modelling method is devised for the measurement of femoral neck anteversion. This method has advantages over the 3D imaging method, such as shorter processing time, reduced number of slices and an objective result compared with the 3D imaging method. The results of the 3D modelling method are compared with the conventional CT methods (2D CT method and 3D imaging method) using 20 dried femurs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amodt, A., Terjesen, T., Enin, J., andKvistad, M. Sc. K. A. (1995): ‘Femoral anteversion measured by ultrasound and CT: a comparative study’,Skeletal Radiol.,24, pp. 105–109
Dunlap, K., Shands, A. J. Jr, Hollister, L. C. Jr, Gaul, J. S. Jr, andStreit, H. A. (1953): ‘A new method for determination of torsion of the femur’,J. Bone Joint Surg.,35A, p. 289
Gelberman, R. H., Cohen, M., Shoaw, B. A., Kasser, J. R., Griffin, P. P., andWilkinson, R. H. ‘The association of femoral retroversion with slipped capital femoral epiphysis’,J. Bone Joint Surg.,68-A,(7), pp. 1000–1007
Gonzalez, R. C., andWoods, R. E. (1994): ‘Digital image processing’ (Addison Wesley)
Fubry, G., Cheng, L. X., andMolenaers, G. (1994): ‘Normal and abnormal torsional development in children’,Clin. Orthopaed. Related Res.,302, pp. 22–26
Høiseth, A., Reikeras, O., andFonstelien, E. (1989): ‘Evaluation of three methods for measurement of femoral neck anteversion’,Acta Radiolog.,30, pp. 69–73
Kim, J.-S., Park, T.-S., Park, S.-B., andKim, S. I. (2000): ‘Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 1∶3D imaging method’,Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.,38, pp. 00–00
Klaus, W. P., Brossmann, J., Daenen, B., Pedowitz, R., De Maeseneer, M., Trudell, D., andResnick, D. (1997): ‘Measurements of cortical thickness in experimentally created edosteal bone lesions: a comparison of radiography, CT, MR imaging and anatomic sections’,Am. J. Radiol.,168, pp. 1501–1505
Reikeras, O., Hoiseth, A., andReigstad, A. (1985): ‘Femoral anteversion measured by the Dunlap/Rippstein and norman methods’,Acta Radiolog. Diag.,26,(3), pp. 303–305
Reinhard, J. T., Guenther, K. P., Rieber, A., Mergo, P., Ros, P. R., andBrambs, H.-J. (1997): ‘MR imaging measurement of the femoral anteversion angle as a new technique: comparison with CT in children and adults’,Am. J. Radiol.,168, pp. 791–794
Robb, R. A. (1994): ‘Three-dimensional biomedical imaging: principles and practice’ (VCH)
Ruby, L., Mital, M. A., O'Connor, J., Patel, U. (1979): ‘Anteversion of the femoral neck’,J. Bone Joint Surg., pp. 46–51
Schneider, B., Laubenberger, J., Jemilish, S., Groene, K., Weber, H. M., andLanger, M. (1997): ‘Measurement of femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion by magnetic resonance imaging’,Br. J. Radiol.,70, pp. 575–579
Murphy, S. B., Sheldon, R. S., Kijewski, P. K., Wilkinson, R. H., andGriscom, T. (1987): ‘Femoral anteversion’,J. Bone Joint Surg.,69, pp. 1169–1176
Terjesen, T., andAnda, S. (1990): ‘Ultrasound measurement of femoral anteversion’,J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br),72(B), pp. 726–727
Weiner, D. S., andCook, A. J. (1980): ‘Practical considerations in the use of computed tomography in the measurement of femoral anteversion’,J. Med. Sci.,16, pp. 288–294
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J.S., Park, T.S., Park, S.B. et al. Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 2:3D modelling method. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 38, 610–616 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344865
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344865