Abstract
Of the gap junction proteins characterized to date, Cx26 is unique in that it is usually expressed in conjunction with other members of the family, typically Cx32 (liver [Nicholson et al., Nature 329:732–734, 1987], pancreas, kidney, and stomach [J.-T. Zhang, B.J. Nicholson, J. Cell Biol. 109:3391–3410, 1989]), or Cx43 (leptomeninges [D.C. Spray et al., Brain Res. 568:1–14, 1991] and pineal gland [J.C. Sáez et al., Brain Res. 568:265–275,1991]). We have used specific antisera both to investigate the distribution of Cx32 and Cx26 in isolated liver gap junctions, and empirically establish the topological model of Cx26 suggested by its sequence and analogy to other connexins. Antipeptide antisera were prepared to four of the five hydrophilic domains which flank the four putative transmembrane spanning regions of Cx26. Antibodies to N-terminal residues 1–17 (αCx26-N), to residues 101–119 in the putative cytoplasmic loop (αCx26-CL), and to C-terminal residues 210–226 (αCx26-C) were all specific for Cx26. An antibody to residues 166–185 between hydrophobic domains 3 and 4 of Cx32 had affinity for both Cx26 and Cx32 (αCx32/26-E2). The antigenic sites Cx26-N, -CL and -C were each demonstrated to be cytoplasmically disposed, although the latter was conformationally hidden prior to partial proteolysis. The antigenic site for αCx32/26-E2 was only accessible after exposure of the extracellular face by separation of the junctional membranes in 8 m urea, pH 12.3. This treatment also served to reveal the region between residues 45 and 66 to Asp-N protease. The topology thus demonstrated for Cx26 is consistent with that deduced for other connexins (i.e., Cx32 and Cx43). Comparison of immunogold decorated gap junctions reacted with antibodies specific to Cx26 (αCx26-N and -CL), or to Cx32 [αCx32-CL], indicates that these connexins do not aggregate in subdomains within a junction, at least within the resolution provided by the labeling density (one antibody per 15–22 connexons). Although the presence of both connexins within a single channel could not be distinguished, possible interactions between channels is discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrio, L.C., Suchyna, T., Bargiello, T., Xu, L.X., Roginski, R.S., Bennett, M.V.L., Nicholson, B.J. 1991. Gap junctions formed by connexin 26 and 32 along and in combination are differently affected by applied voltage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:8410–8414
Bennett, M.V.L., Barrio, L.C., Bargiello, T.A., Spray, D.C., Hertzberg, E., Saez, J.C. 1991. Gap junctions: New tools, new answers, new questions. Neuron 6:305–320
Bok, D., Dockstader, J., Horwitz, J. 1982. Immunocytochemical localization of the lens main intrinsic polypeptide (MIP26) in communicating junctions. J. Cell Biol. 92:213–220
Dahl, G., Miller, T., Paul, D., Voellmy, R., Werner, R. 1987. Expression of functional cell-cell channels from cloned rat liver complimentary DNA. Science 236:1290–1293
DeHaan, R.L., Williams, E.H., Ypey, D.L., Clapham, D.E. 1981. Intercellular coupling of embryonic heart cells. In: Perspectives in Cardiovascular Research, Mechanisms of Cardiac Morphogenesis and Teratogenesis. T. Pexieder, editor. Vol. 5, pp. 249–316. Raven, New York
Dermietzel, R., Leibstein, A., Frixen, U., Janssen-Timmen, U., Traub, O., Willecke, K. 1984. Gap junctions in several tissues share antigenic determinants with liver-gap junctions. EMBO J. 3:2261–2270
Finer-Moore, J., Stroud, R.M. 1984. Amphipathic analysis and possible formation of the ion channel in an acetylcholine receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:155–159
Fozzard, H.A., Arnsdorf, M.F. 1986. Cardiac electrophysiology. In: The Heart and Cardiovascular System. H.A. Fozzard, E. Haber, R.B. Jennings, A.M. Katz, and H.E. Morgan, editors, pp. 1–30. Raven, New York
Gimlich, R.L., Kumar, N.M., Gilula, N.B. 1990. Differential regulation of the levels of three gap junction mRNAs in Xenopus embryos. J. Cell Biol. 110:597–605
Goodenough, D.A., Paul, D.L., Jesaitis, L.A. 1988. Topological distribution of two connexin 32 antigenic sites in intact and split rodent hepatocyte gap junctions. J. Cell Biol. 107:1817–1824
Goodenough, D.A., Stoeckenius, W. 1972. The isolation of hepatocyte gap junctions. Preliminary chemical characterization and x-ray diffraction. J. Cell Biol 54:646–656
Gros, D.B., Nicholson, B.J., Revel, J.-P. 1983. Comparative analysis of the gap junction protein from rat heart and liver: Is there a tissue specificity of gap junctions? Cell 35:539–549
Guthrie, S.C., Gilula, N.B. 1989. Gap junctional communication and development. Trends Neurosci. 12:12–16
Henderson, D., Eibl, H., Weber, K. 1979. Structure and biochemistry of mouse hepatic gap junctions. J. Mol. Biol. 132:193–218
Hertzberg, E.L. 1984. A detergent independent procedure for the isolation of gap junctions from rat liver. J. Biol. Chem. 259:9936–9943
Hertzberg, E.L., Disher, R.M., Tiller, A.A., Zhou, Y., Cook, R.G. 1988. Topology of the Mr 27,000 liver gap junction protein cytoplasmic localization of amino- and carboxy-termini and a hydrophilic domain which is protease sensitive. J. Biol. Chem. 263:19105–19111
Hertzberg, E.L., Gilula, N.B. 1979. Isolation and characterization of gap junctions from rat liver. J. Biol. Chem. 254:2138–2147
Hertzberg, E.L., Lawrence, T.S., Gilula, N.B. 1981. Gap junctional communication. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 43:479–491
Hertzberg, E.L., Spray, D.C., Bennett, M.V.L. 1985. Reduction of gap junctional conductance by microinjection of antibodies against the 27 kD liver gap junction polypeptide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:2412–2416
Hoh, J.H., John, S.A., Revel, J.-P. 1991. Molecular cloning and characterization of a new member of the gap junction gene family connexin-31. J. Biol. Chem. 266:6524–6531
Joyner, R.W. 1982. Effects of the discrete pattern of electrical coupling on propagation through an electrical syncitium. Circ. Res. 50:192–200
Kistler, J., Christie, D., Bullivant, S. 1988. Homologues between gap junction proteins in lens, heart and liver. Nature 331:721–723
Klaunig, J.E., Ruch, R.J., 1990. Biology of disease: Role of inhibition of intercellular communication in carcinogenesis. Lab Invest. 62:135–146
Leonard, R.J., Labarca, C.G., Charnet, P., Davidson, N., Lester, H.A. 1988. Evidence that the M2 membrane spanning region lines the pore of the nicotinic receptor. Science 242:1578–1581
Loewenstein, W.R. 1979. Junctional intercellular communication and the control of cell growth. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 560:1–65
Loewenstein, W.R. 1981. Junctional intercellular communication: the cell-to-cell membrane channel. Physiol. Rev. 61:829–913
Manjunath, C.K., Goings, G.E., Page, E. 1984. Detergent sensitivity and splitting of isolated liver gap junctions. J. Membrane Biol. 85:159–168
Manjunath, C.K., Nicholson, B.J., Teplow, D., Hood, L.E., Page, E., Revel, J.-P. 1987. The cardiac gap junction protein (Mr 47,000) has a tissue-specific cytoplasmic domain of Mr 17,000 at its carboxy-terminus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 142:228–234
Milks, L.C., Kumar, N.M., Houghten, R., Unwin, N., Gilula, N. 1988. Topology of the 32 kD liver gap junction protein determined by site-directed antibody localizations. EMBO J. 7:2967–2975
Nicholson, B.J., Dermietzel, R., Teplow, D., Traub, O., Willecke, K., Revel, J.-P. 1987. Two homologous proteins of hepatic gap junctions. Nature 329:732–734
Nicholson, B.J., Hunkapiller, M.W., Grim, L.B., Hood, L.E., Revel, J.-P. 1981. The rat liver gap junction protein: Properties and partial sequence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:7594–7598
Nicholson, B.J., Suchyna, T., Xu, L.X., Hammernick, P., Cao, F.L., Fourtner, C., Barrio, L., Bennett, M.V.L. 1992. Divergent properties of different connexins expressed in Xenopus oocytes. In: Progress in Cell Research: Gap Junctions. J.E. Hall, G.A. Zampighi, and R.M. Davis, editors. Vol. 3, pp. 3–13. Elsevier Science Publishers, New York
Nicholson, B.J., Takemoto, L., Hunkapiller, M.W., Hood, L.E., Revel, J.-P. 1983. Differences between the proteins of liver gap junctions and lens fiber junctions from rat: Implications for tissue specificity of gap junctions. Cell 32:967–978
Nicholson, B.J., Zhang, J.-T. 1988. Multiple protein components of a single gap junction: Cloning of a second hepatic gap junction protein (Mr 21,000). In: Modern Cell Biology. E.L. Hertzberg, and R.C. Johnson, editors. Vol. 7, pp. 207–218. Alan R. Liss, New York
Noda, M., Shimizu, S., Tanabe, T., Takai, T., Kavano, T., Ikeda, T., Takahashi, H., Nakayama, H., Kanoka, Y., Minamino, N., Kangawa, K., Matsuo, H., Raftery, M.A., Hirose, T., Inayama, S., Hayasida, H., Miyata, T., Numa, S. 1984. Primary structure of the Electrophorus electricus sodium channels deduced from cDNA sequence. Nature 312:121–127
Paul, D.L. 1986. Molecular cloning of cDNA for rat liver gap junctional protein. J. Cell Biol. 103:123–134
Paul, D.L., Goodenough, D.A. 1983. J. Cell Biol. 93:625–632
Revel, J.-P., Nicholson, B.J., Yancey, C.B. 1984. Molecular organization of gap junctions. Fed. Proc. 43:2672–2677
Sáez, J.C., Berthoud, V.M., Kadle, R., Traub, O., Nicholson, B.J., Bennett, M.V.L., Dermeitzel, R. 1991. Pinealocytes in rats: connexin identification and increase in coupling caused by norepinephrine. Brain Res. 568:265–275
Sáez, J.C., Connor, J.A., Spray, D.C., Bennett, M.V.L. 1989. Hepatocyte gap junctions are permeable to the second messenger inositol, 1, 45-triphosphate, and to calcium ion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:2708–2712
Sheridan, J.D., Atkinson, M.M. 1985. Physiological roles of permeable junctions: some possibilities. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 47:337–353
Spach, M.S., Kootsey, J.M. 1983. The nature of electrical propagation in cardiac muscle. Am. J. Physiol. 244:H3
Spray, D.C., Moreno, A.P., Kessler, J.A., Dermietzel, R. 1991. Characterization of gap junctions between cultured leptomeningeal cells. Brain Res. 568:1–14
Towbin, H.H., Staehelin, T., Gordon, J. 1979. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylaraide gels to introcellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:4350–4354
Traub, O., Look, J., Dermietzel, R., Brummer, F., Hulser, D., Willecke, K. 1989. Comparative characterization of the 21 kD and 26 kD gap junction proteins in murine liver and cultured mouse hepatocytes. J. Cell Biol. 108:1039–1051
Willecke, K., Henneman, H., Dahl, E., Jungbluth, S., Heynkes, R. 1991. The diversity of connexin genes encoding gap junctions. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 56:1–7
Yancey, S.B., John, S.A., Lal, R., Austin, B.J., Revel, J.-P. 1989. The 43 kD polypeptide of heart junctions: immunolocalization, topology and functional domains. J. Cell Biol. 108:2241–2254
Yellen, G., Jurman, M.E., Abramson, T., MacKinnon, R. 1991. Mutations affecting internal TEA blockage identify the probable pore-forming region of a K+ channel. Science 251:939–941
Zhang, J.-T., Nicholson, B.J. 1989. Sequence and tissue distribution of a second protein of hepatic gap junctions, Cx26, as deduced from its cDNA. J. Cell Biol. 109:3391–3410
Zimmer, D.B., Green, D.R., Evans, W.H., Gilula, N.B. 1987. Topological analyses of the major protein in isolated rat liver gap junctions and gap junction derived single membrane structures. J. Biol. Chem. 262:7751–7763
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We would like primarily to recognize the input and work of Alan Siegel in helping to achieve EM labeling of gap junctions and Ms. Feng Gao for characterization of the antibodies used. We would also like to thank Kathleen Sodaro and Marty Bartel for technical help in preparation of the antibodies, Linda Mack and Rose Stern for help in preparation of the manuscript and James Stamos for preparation of the figures. This work was supported by a grant from the U.S. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, CA 48049 and a Scholars award in the biomedical sciences from the PEW Charitable Trust (to B.J.N.).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J.T., Nicholson, B.J. The topological structure of connexin 26 and its distribution compared to connexin 32 in hepatic gap junctions. J. Membarin Biol. 139, 15–29 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232671
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232671