Skip to main content
Log in

Anatomic bases for anterior spinal surgery: surgical anatomy of the cervical vertebral body and disc space

Bases anatomiques de la chirurgie vertébrale cervicale par voie antérieure. Anatomie chirurgicale du corps vertébral et du disque intervertébral cervicaux

  • Anatomic Bases Of Medical, Radiological And Surgical Techniques
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Twenty adult cadaveric cervical spines were sectioned longitudinally through the midline to display longitudinal sections of the vertebral bodies and disc spaces from C3 to T1. Computer-assisted anatomic images were obtained for measurements of the disc spaces and vertebral bodies. Anteroposterior (AP) depth gradually increased from 16.56±2.21 mm at C3 to 19.32±2.30 mm at C7. Greater values of AP depth at the inferior endplate were found at C5 (20.75±2.87 mm) and C6 (20.56±2.31 mm) compared with the values at C3 (18.26±1.82 mm), C4 (19.27±2.88 mm) and C7 (19.21±3.22 mm). The AP depth at the superior endplate was greater than that at the inferior endplate. The height of the disc space was found to be lowest at the posterior disc space from C2–3 to C7-T1 (2.95±0.86 mm at C2–3, 2.78±0.93 mm at C3–4, 2.45±0.79 mm at C4–5, 2.92±0.64 mm at C5–6, 2.46±0.59 mm at C6–7, 2.93±1.05 mm at C7-T1), when compared to the height of the disc space at the anterior disc space from C2–3 to C7-T1 (4.07±0.85 mm at C2–3, 4.34±1.18 mm at C3–4, 3.95±1.37 mm at C4–5, 3.55±1.37 mm at C5–6, 3.55±0.76 mm at C6–7, 3.67±1.17 mm at C7-T1). The mid-axis of the disc space was situated at approximately 3 mm above the anterior midpoint of the annulus fibrosus at the level of the lower cervical spine. To reach the posterior portion of the disc space from the anterior midpoint of the annulus fibrosus, a 5° cephalad angulation of the drill relative to the midaxis of the disc space is necessary. All these original data from cadavers may be helpful during anterior approach for discectomy, vertebrectomy and anterior screw-plate placement.

Résumé

20 colonnes cervicales issues de cadavres d'adultes ont été sectionnées longitudinalement sur la ligne médiane pour fournir des coupes longitudinales des corps vertébraux et des disques intervertébraux de C3 à T1. Les images anatomiques obtenues ont été traitées à l'aide d'un ordinateur pour fournir des mesures des disques intervertébraux et des corps vertébraux. L'épaisseur antéropostérieure (AP) augmentait progressivement de 16,56±2,21 mm en C3 à 19,32±2,30 mm en C7. Les valeurs les plus importantes de l'épaisseur AP au plateau vertébral inférieur ont été relevées en C5 (20,75±2,87 mm) et C6 (20,56±2,31 mm) alors qu'elles étaient plus faibles en C3 (18,26±1,82 mm), C4 (19,27±2,88 mm), et C7 (19,21±3,22 mm). L'épaisseur AP mesurée au plateau vertébral supérieur était plus importante que celle mesurée au plateau inférieur. La hauteur du disque intervertébral était moins élevée à la partie postérieure des disques intervertébraux de C2–C3 à C7-T1 (2,95±0,86 mm en C2–C3, 2,78±0,93 mm en C3–C4, 2,45±0,79 mm en C4–C5, 2,92±0,64 mm en C5–C6, 2,46±0,59 mm en C6–C7, et 2,93±1,05 mm en C7-T1) en comparaison avec celles relevées à la partie antérieure de l'espace de C2–C3 à C7-T1 (4,07±0,85 mm en C2–C3, 4,34±1,18 mm en C3–C4, 3,95±1,37 mm en C4–C5, 3,55±1,37 mm en C5–C6, 3,55±0,76 mm en C6–C7, et 3,67±1,19 mm en C7-T1). L'axe moyen du disque intervertébral était situé environ 3 mm audessus du point moyen antérieur de l'annulus fibrosus au niveau de la partie inférieure de la colonne cervicale. Pour atteindre la partie postérieure de l'espace intervertébral, à partir du point moyen antérieur de l'annulus fibrosus, il faut donner à la mèche une angulation de 5° vers la tête par rapport à l'axe moyen du disque intervertébral. Toutes ces données cadavériques originales peuvent rendre service au cours des abords antérieurs pour discectomie, vertébrectomie, et mise en place de plaque et de vis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aebi M, Zuber K, Marchesi D (1991) Treatment of cervical spine injuries with anterior plating. Spine 16: S38-S45

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams CBT, Logue V (1971) Studies in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. III: Some functional effects of operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Brain 94 : 587–606

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown JA, Havel P, Ebraheim NA, Greenblatt SH, Jackson WT (1988) Cervical stabilization by plate and bone fusion. Spine 13: 236–240

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caspar W, Barbier DD, Klara PM (1989) Anterior cervical fusion and Caspar plate stabilization for cervical trauma. Neurosurgery. 25: 491–502

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cloward RB (1958) The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disc. J Neurosurg 15: 602–614

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Biyani A, Brown JA, Yeasting RA (1997) Anatomic considerations for uncovertebral involvement in cervical spondylosis. Clin Orthop 334: 200–206

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Brown JA, Biyani A, Yeasting RA (1996) Vulnerability of vertebral artery in anterolateral decompression for cervical spondylosis. Clin Orthop 322: 146–51

    Google Scholar 

  8. Francis CC (1955) Dimensions of the cervical vertebrae. Anat Rec 122: 603–609

    Google Scholar 

  9. Friendenberg ZB, Miller WT (1963) Degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine: A comparative study of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. J Bone Joint Surg 45A : 1171–1178

    Google Scholar 

  10. Galera R, Tovi D (1968) Anterior disc excision with interbody fusion in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and rhizopathy. J Neurosurg 28: 305–310

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gore DR, Sepic SB, Gardner GM (1986) Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine 6: 521–524

    Google Scholar 

  12. Graham JJ (1989) Complications of cervical spine surgery: a five year report on a survey of the membership of the cervical spine research society by the morbidity and mortality committee. Spine 14 : 1046–1050

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lu J, Ebraheim NA, Yang H, Yeasting RA (1998) Cervical uncinate process : an anatomic study for anterior decompression of the cervical spine. Surg Radiol Anat. In press

  14. Nissan M, Gilad I (1984) The cervical and lumbar vertebrae: an anthropometric model. Eng Med 13 : 111–114

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pait TG, Killefer JA, Arnautovic KI (1996) Surgical anatomy of the anterior cervical spine: the disc space, vertebral artery, and associated bony structures. Neurosurgery 39 : 769–776

    Google Scholar 

  16. Panjabi MM, Duranceau J, Goel V, et al (1991) Cervical human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine 16: 861–869

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson RA, Smith GW (1955) Anterolateral disc removal and interbody fusion for cervical disc syndrome. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 96: 223–224

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson RA, Walker AE, Ferlic DC, et al (1962) The results of anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg 44A: 1569–1587

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smith GW, Robinson RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg 40A: 607–623

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sugar O (1981) Spinal cord malfunction after anterior cervical discectomy. Surg Neurol 15: 4–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, J., Ebraheim, N.A., Yang, H. et al. Anatomic bases for anterior spinal surgery: surgical anatomy of the cervical vertebral body and disc space. Surg Radiol Anat 21 (Suppl 4), 235–239 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01631392

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01631392

Key words

Navigation