Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of soft tissue sarcomas response to preoperative treatment: Assessment by angiography, thallium scintigraphy, and dynamic MRI

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Assessment of the response of soft tissue sarcomas to preoperative treatment is of significant clinical importance. However, there are few reports concerning the accuracy of each imaging technique in assessing the response of soft tissue sarcomas to preoperative treatment.

Methods

The responses of 15 soft tissue sarcomas to preoperative treatment by digital subtraction angiography, thallium scintigraphy, and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were compared with histologic evaluation of the resected specimens. Tumors with at least 90% histologic necrosis were considered to be effectively treated.

Results

The accuracy of each assessment technique was 58.3% for digital subtraction angiography, 80% for thallium scintigraphy, and 77.8% for dynamic MRI. Both the differences in slope before and after treatment and the posttreatment slope values of dynamic MRI correlated with the histologic responses.

Conclusion

Thallium scintigraphy and dynamic MRI showed sufficient value in the assessment of soft tissue sarcomas responses to preoperative treatment. Dynamic MRI had major advantages in its quantitative and spatial resolutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Link MP, Goorin AM, Miser AW, Green AA, Pratt CB, Belasco JB, Pritchard J, Malpas JS, Baker AR, Kirkpatrick JA, Ayala AG, Shuster JJ, Abelson HT, Simone JV, Vietti TJ. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on relapse-free survival in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremity. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1600–1606.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosen G, Caparros B, Huvos AG, Kosloff C, Nirenberg A, Cacavio A, Marcove RC, Lane JM, Mehta B, Urban C. Preoperative chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma: selection of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy based on the response of the primary tumor to preoperative chemotherapy. Cancer 1982;49:1221–1230.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Suit HD, Mankin HJ, Wood WC, Proppe KH. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative radiation in the treatment of primary soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer 1985;55:2659–2667.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barkley HT Jr, Martin RG, Romsdahl MM, Lindberg R, Zagars GK. Treatment of soft tissue sarcomas by preoperative irradiation and conservative surgical resection. Int J Radiat Oncol 1988;14:693–699.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tepper J, Suit H. Radiation therapy of soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer 1985;55:2273–2277.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Raymond AK, Chawla SP, Carrasco CH, Ayala AG, Fanning CV, Grice B, Armen T, Plager C, Papadopoulos NEJ, Edeiken J, Wallace S, Jaffe N, Murray JA, Benjamin RS. Osteosarcoma chemotherapy effect; a prognostic factor. Semin Diagn Pathol 1987;4:212–236.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith J, Heelan RT, Huvos AG, Caparros B, Rosen G, Urmacher C, Caravelli JF. Radiographic changes in primary osteogenic sarcoma following intensive chemotherapy. Radiology 1982;143:355–360.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wellings RM, Davies AM, Pynsent PB, Carter SR, Grimer RJ. The value of computed tomographic measurements in osteosarcoma as a predictor of response to adjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Radiol 1994;49:19–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumpan W, Lechner G, Wittich GR, Salzer-Kuntschik M, Delling G, Kotz R, Hajek P, Sekera J. The angiographic response of osteosarcoma following pre-operative chemotherapy. Skeletal Radiol 1986;15:96–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carrasco CH, Charnsangavej C, Raymond AK, Richli WR, Wallace S, Chawla SP, Ayala AG, Murray JA, Benjamin RS. Osteosarcoma: angiographic assessment of response to preoperative chemotherapy. Radiology 1989;170:839–842.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramanna L, Waxman A, Binney G, Waxman S, Mirra J, Rosen G. Thallium-201 scintigraphy in bone sarcoma: comparison with gallium-67 and technetium-MDP in the evaluation of chemotherapeutic response. J Nucl Med 1990;31:567–572.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Holscher HC, Bloem JL, Van Der Woude HJ, Hermans J, Nooy MA, Taminiau AHM, Hogendoorn PCW. Can MRI predict the histopathological response in patients with osteosarcoma after the first cycle of chemotherapy? Clin Radiol 1995;50:384–390.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanchez RB, Quinn SF, Walling A, Estrada J, Greenberg H. Musculoskeletal neoplasms after intraarterial chemotherapy: correlation of MR images with pathologic specimens. Radiology 1990;174:237–240.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Erlemann R, Sciuk J, Bosse A, Ritter J, Kusnierz-Glaz CR, Peters PE, Wuisman P. Response of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma to preoperative chemotherapy: assessment with dynamic and static MR imaging and skeletal scintigraphy. Radiology 1990;175:791–796.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Menendez LR, Fideler BM, Mirra J. Thallium-201 scanning for the evaluation of osteosarcoma and soft-tissue sarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg 1993;75-A:526–531.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sehweil AM, McKillop JH, Milroy R, Wilson R, Abdel-Dayem HM, Omar YT. Mechanism of 201T1 uptake in tumours. Eur J Nucl Med 1989;15:376–379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kawai A, Kuroda M, Sugihara S, Kunisada T, Taguchi K, Hiraki Y, Inoue H. Preoperative hyperthermochemoradiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma. J Orthop Sci 1996;1(4):246–251.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fletcher BD, Hanna SL, Fairclough DL, Gronemeyer SA. Pediatric musculoskeletal tumors; use of dynamic, contrast-enhanced MR imaging to monitor response to chemotherapy. Radiology 1992;184:243–248.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huvos AG, Rosen G, Marcove RC. Primary osteogenic sarcoma; pathologic aspects in 20 patients after treatment with chemotherapy, en bloc resection, and prosthetic bone replacement. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1977;101:14–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lechner G, Salzer-Kuntschik M, Kumpan W, Kotz R, Engel A, Sekera J. Angiographic-pathologic comparison in osteosarcoma after presurgical chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1983;06(suppl):51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pan G, Raymond AK, Carrasco CH, Wallace S, Kim EE, Shirkhoda A, Jaffe N, Murray JA, Benjamin RS. Osteosarcoma: MR imaging after preoperative chemotherapy. Radiology 1990;174:517–526.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Panicek DM, Schwartz LH, Heelan RT, Caravelli JF. Non-neoplastic causes of high signal intensity at T2-weighted MR imaging after treatment for musculoskeletal neoplasm. Skeletal Radiol 1995;24:185–190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schörner W, Laniado M, Niendorf HP, Schubert C, Felix R. Time-dependent changes in image contrast in brain tumors after gadolinium-DTPA. AJNR 1986;7:1013–1020.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Verstraete KL, Dierick A, DeDeene Y, Uyttendaele D, Vandamme F, Roels H, Kunnen M. First-pass images of musculoskeletal lesions; a new and useful diagnostic application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 1994;12:687–702.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Elias AD, Antman KH. Adjuvant chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma: an approach in search of an effective regimen. Semin Oncol 1989;16:305–311.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Kawai, A., Sugihara, S., Kunisada, T. et al. Evaluation of soft tissue sarcomas response to preoperative treatment: Assessment by angiography, thallium scintigraphy, and dynamic MRI. Int J Clin Oncol 1, 93–99 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348274

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348274

Key words

Navigation