Skip to main content
Log in

A study on reliability of the tomographic image of the temporomandibular joint

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

For this study, seven different types of phantom were made simulating the condyle. The phantoms attached to a human dry skull were tomographed using the Polytome-U, under identical conditions to those of tomography for patients.

There was no significant difference of the images between tube side and film side of the mandible. The images of the medial part of the TMJ were clearer than that of the lateral part.

A discrepancy of contours on the focal plane between the phantom and the tomographic image occurred when the inclination of the phantom surface was larger than the maximum exposure angle.

Concerning the influence of focal movements to image quality, the images obtained from hypocycloidal movements were superior with minimum superimposition, although the contrast of the image varied when the phase of the hypocycloidal movements were altered. Any sectional images were not manifested with the phantoms when the inclination of the phantom surface was larger than 23 degrees.

Furthermore, 106 condyles from human dry skull were examined on the area of which the inclination of the condylar surface was less than 23 degrees. The mean latero-medial distance of the area was 14.1mm, which corresponded to 75% of whole latero-medial distance of the condyle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ricketts, R. M.:The temporomandibular joint. 2nd ed. pp. 102–132, 1964, Thomas Books, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mongini, F.: The importance of radiography in the diagnosis of TMJ dysfunctions. A comparative evaluation of transcranial radiographs and serial tomography.J. Prosthet. Dent. 45: 186–198, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Petersson, A. and Nanthaviroj, S.: Radiography of the temporomandibular joint utilizing in the transmaxillary projection.Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 4: 76–83, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hansson, L. G. and Petersson, A.: Radiography of the temporomandibular joint using the transpharyngeal projection.Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 7: 69–78, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weinberg, L. A.: Practical evaluation of the lateral temporomandibular joint radiograph.J. Prosthet. Dent. 51: 676–685, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ricketts, R. M.: Laminagraphy in the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders.J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 46: 620–648, 1953

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ogura, H.: A diagnostic study on the temporomandibular arthrosis using tomography. — threedimensional measurement of TMJ bony space—.Jap. Soc. Dent. Radiol. 24: 81–99, 1984 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ricketts, R. M.: Variations of the temporomandibular joint as revealed by cephalometric laminagraphy.Am. J. Orthod. 36: 877–898, 1950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Blair, G. S. et al.: Circular tomography of the temporomandibular joint. A critical evaluation of the accuracy and reproducibility of the technique.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 35: 416–427, 1973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pullinger, A. G. and Hollender, L.: Variation in condyle-fossa relationship according to different methods of evaluation in tomograms.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 67: 719–727, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marstrander, F.: Fundamental problems in connection with image formation in tomography.Acta Radiol. [Suppl. 116]: 208–216, 1954

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mattson, O.: Control of a tomographic system.Acta Radiol. [Diag.] 8: 433–445, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reichmann, S.: Development of spurious contours of spherical and cylindrical objects in tomography.Acta Radiol. [Diag.] 12: 317–334, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eckerdal, O.: Tomography of the temporomandibular joint.Medicamundi 16: 144–150, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eckerdal, O.: Tomography of the temporomandibular joint.Acta Radiol. [Suppl 324] 1973

  16. Yale, S. H., Allison, B. D. and Hauptfuehrer, J. D.: An epidemiological assessment of mandibular condyle morphology.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 21: 169–177, 1966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. ICRU report 10f:Methods of evaluating radiological equipment and materials. pp. 15–26, 1963, Washington D. C., U.S.A.

  18. Miller, T. L., Katzberg, R. W. et al.: Temporomandibular joint clicking with nonreducing anterior displacement of the meniscus.Radiology 154: 121–124, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dantoko, Y.:Text book of clinico-radiological technology 6th ed. pp. 69–77, 1984, Nankodo, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Littleton, J. T.: Some blurring characteristics of small angle tomography.Medicamundi 10: 10–20, 1964

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Korach, G. et al.: Selective employment of the Polytome in accordance with type of examination.Medicamundi 11: 82–91, 1966

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takahashi, A., Fuchihata, H. A study on reliability of the tomographic image of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Radiol. 5, 11–22 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350098

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350098

Key Words

Navigation