Abstract
Populations of different taxa withinBeta sect.Beta were compared using a number of floral and reproductive characters. Plants which were known to be self-incompatible (through S-allele incompatibility) were found to be morphologically distinct from those which were self-compatible, with the floral characteristics of the latter promoting their autogamy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artschwager, E., 1927: Development of flower and seed in the sugar beet. — J. Agric. Res.34, 1–25.
—, 1933: The time factor in fertilization and embryo development in the sugar beet. — J. Agric. Res.47, 823–843.
Dale, M. F. B., 1980: Breeding patterns in the genusBeta, sectionBeta. — Ph. D. thesis, University of Birmingham, U.K.
Larsen, K., 1977: Self-incompatibility inBeta vulgaris L. 1. Four gametophytic, complementary S-loci in sugar beet. — Hereditas85, 227–248.
Moore, D. M., Lewis, H., 1965: The evolution of self-pollination inClarkia xantiana. — Evolution19, 104–114.
Ornduff, R., 1969: The significance of reproductive biology for taxonomy. — Taxon18, 121–133.
Owen, F. V., 1942: Inheritance of cross- and self-sterility as self-fertility inBeta vulgaris L. — J. Agric Res.64 (12), 679–698.
Payer, J. B., 1857: Traité d'organogénie de la fleur. — Paris.
Rick, C. M., 1950: Pollination relations ofLycopersicon esculentum in native and foreign regions. — Evolution4, 110–133.
Schwanitz, F., 1940: Beiträge zur Züchtung und Genetik selbst-fertiler Rüben (Beta vulgaris L.) I. — Züchter12, 167–178.
Stebbins, G. L., 1957: Self-fertilisation and population variability in the higher plants. — Am. Nat.91, 337–354.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dale, M.F.B., Ford-Lloyd, B.V. Reproductive characters associated with breeding behaviour inBeta sect.Beta (Chenopodiaceae). Pl Syst Evol 143, 277–283 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986609
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986609