Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of dorsal root entry zone lesion on spinal cord potentials evoked by segmental, ascending and descending volleys

  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The spinal cord potentials (SCPs) were recorded from the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) and posterior epidural space in patients before and after dorsal root entry zone lesion (DREZL) during general anaesthesia. The SCPs from the DREZ activated by segmental, ascending and descending volleys were basically the same in fundamental waveform as those recorded from the posterior epidural space. Segmentally activated slow negative (N1) wave, reflecting synchronized activities of dorsal horn neurones, and positive (P2) wave, thought to indicate primary afferent depolarization, were affected by DREZL in all 4 subjects tested, even by contralateral stimulation, suggesting that these components of the segmental SCPs in man partly reflect the activities of the contralateral dorsal horn. The spike-like potentials activated by ascending volleys were not affected by DREZL, while the subsequent slow components were decreased in the lesioned level. This may indicate that ascending spinal cord tracts are not affected by the operation, and suggests that the origin of the slow components by ascending volleys lies at least in part in the segmental dorsal horn. The slow negative and positive components, recorded at a remote segment from DREZL, in response to the descending volleys, were augmented after DREZL, suggesting that activation of ascending or descending inhibition through a feedback loop via the supraspinal structures might occur at least transiently following DREZL. All components of the SCPs activated by descending volleys were decreased or disappeared in recording from the lesioned level, as expected. Thus, intra-operative recording of the SCPs during DREZL might be beneficial for monitoring and studying human spinal cord function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Besson JM, Rivot JP (1973) Spinal interneurones involved in presynaptic controls of supraspinal origin. J Physiol (Lond) 230: 235–254

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eccles JC, Krnjević K (1959) Potential changes recorded inside primary afferent fibers within the spinal cord. J Physiol (Lond) 149: 250–273

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fung SJ, Barnes CD (1984) Locus coeruleus control of spinal cord activity. In: Barnes CD (ed) Brain stem control of spinal cord function. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 215–255

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gasser HS, Graham HT (1933) Potentials produced in the spinal cord by stimulation of dorsal roots. Am J Physiol 103: 303–320

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hallström YT, Lindblom U, Meyerson BA, Prevec TS (1989) Epidurally recorded cervical spinal activity evoked by electrical and mechanical stimulation in pain patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 74: 175–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ishijima B, Shimizu H, Takahashi H, Yasue S, Shimizu H, Shimoji K (1985) Dorsal root entry zone-tomy and trigeminal spinal nucleotomy for deafferented pain with the consideration of the pain modulation mechanisms in the dorsal horn. Neurosurgeons 4: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jeanmonod D, Sindou M (1991) Somatosensory function following dorsal root entry zone lesions in patients with neurogenic pain or spasticity. J Neurosurg 74: 916–932

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koketsu K (1956) Intracellular potential changes of primary afferent nerve fibers in spinal cords of cats. J Neurophysiol 19: 357–392

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kumagai Y, Shimoji K, Honma T, Uchiyama S, Ishijima B, Hokari T, Fujioka H, Fukuda S, Ohama E (1992) Problems related to dorsal root entry zone lesions. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 115: 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maruyama Y, Shimoji K, Shimizu H, Kuribayashi H, Fujioka H (1982) Human spinal cord potentials evoked by different sources of stimulation and conduction velocities along the cord. J Neurophysiol 48: 1098–1107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nashold BS Jr, Ostdahl RH (1979) Dorsal root entry zone lesions for pain relief. J Neurosurg 51: 59–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nashold BS Jr, Ovelmen-Levitt J, Sharpe R, Higgins AC (1985) Intraoperative evoked potentials recorded in man directly from dorsal roots and spinal cord. J Neurosurg 62: 680–693

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nashold BS Jr, Urban B, Zorub DS (1976) Phantom relief by focal destruction of substantia gelatinosa of Rolando. In: Bonica JJ, Albe-Fessard D (eds) Advances in pain research and therapy, Vol. 1. Raven Press, New York, pp 959–963

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prestor B, Zgur T, Dolenc W (1989) Subpial spinal evoked potentials in patients undergoing junctional dorsal root entry zone coagulation for pain relief. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 101: 56–62

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidt RF (1971) Presynaptic inhibition in the vertebrate central nervous system. Ergeb Physiolo Biol Chem Exp Pharmacol 63: 20–101

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shimizu H, Shimoji K, Maruyama Y, Matsuki M, Kuribayashi H, Fujioka H (1982) Human spinal cord potentials produced in lumbosacral enlargement by descending volleys. J Neurophysiol 48: 1108–1120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimoji K (1986) Human spinal cord potentials (SCPs): Ascending recording variations — an update. In: Ducker TB, Brown RH (eds) Neurophysiology and standards of spinal cord monitoring. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 19–28

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shimoji K, Fujioka H, Maruyama Y, Hokari T, Takada T (1986) Spinal cord potentials (SCPs) produced by descending volleys in the rat. In: Ducker TB, Brown RH (eds) Neurophysiology and standards of spinal cord monitoring. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 73–81

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shimoji K, Fujiwara N, Fukuda S, Denda S, Takada T, Maruyama Y (1990) Effects of isoflurane on spinal inhibitory potentials. Anesthesiology 72: 851–857

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shimoji K, Higashi H, Kano T (1971) Epidural recording of spinal electrogram in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 30: 236–239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shimoji K, Kano T, Higashi H, Morioka T, Henschel EO (1972) Evoked spinal electrograms recorded from epidural space in man. J Appl Physiol 33: 468–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shimoji K, Matsuki M, Ito Y, Masuko K, Maruyama M, Iwane T, Aida S (1976) Interactions of human cord dorsum potential. J Appl Physiol 40: 79–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shimoji K, Matsuki M, Shimizu H (1977) Wave-form characteristics and spatial distribution of evoked spinal electrogram in man. J Neurosurg 46: 304–313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shimoji K, Sato Y, Denda S, Takada T, Fukuda S (1992) Slow positive dorsal cord potentials activated by heterosegmental stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 85: 72–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sindou M (1972) Etude de la jonction radiculomédullaire postérieure. La radicellotomie postérieure sélective dans la chirurgie de la douleur. Médical Thesis, Lyon

  26. Yates BJ, Thompson FJ, Mickle JP (1982) Origin and properties of spinal cord field potentials. Neurosurgery 11: 439–450

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fujioka, H., Shimoji, K., Tomita, M. et al. Effects of dorsal root entry zone lesion on spinal cord potentials evoked by segmental, ascending and descending volleys. Acta neurochir 117, 135–142 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01400610

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01400610

Keywords

Navigation