Summary
No infallible preoperative method exists to predict accurately a patient's tolerance to unilateral carotid artery ligation. It has recently been hypothesized that the magnitude of increase in contralateral carotid artery flow resulting from trial compression of the ipsilateral common carotid artery might be of value in determining the result of permanent ligation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate three factors which might influence the contralateral flow increase: the carotid sinus reflex, the vertebro-basilar artery circulation, and the degree of anastomotic crossover in the anterior part of the circle of Willis.
The effects of these three factors were studied in the following situations: (1) Before and after ablation of the ipsilateral carotid sinus in eight dogs (by cutting the ninth and tenth cranial nerves); (2) Before and after ligation of both vertebral arteries in three dogs: (3) Before and after separation of the anterior circle of Willis by clipping an anterior cerebral artery in two monkeys.Results: (1) Carotid sinus denervation had no effect in three dogs, diminished the increase by an average of 25% in three dogs, and enhanced the increase by an average of 50% in two dogs: (2) Bilateral vertebral artery ligation enhanced the increase in all three dogs by an average of 66%; (3) Separation of the anterior circle of Willis caused a diminution of the increase in both monkeys by an average of 66%; (4) There was no relationship between the degree of contralateral flow increase and 1. systemic blood pressure, 2. contralateral flow prior to occlusion, or 3. ipsilateral flow prior to occlusion.Conclusions: (1) In the experimental situation, the carotid sinus reflex is not consistently responsible for the contralateral carotid flow increase; (2) The observations on the vertebral artery occlusion and monkey studies lend support to the concept that if a contiguous vascular bed is removed from access to carotid blood, the flow through the system will decrease, and vice versa. The data are placed into clinical perspective.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ask-Upmark, E., Carotid sinus and cerebral circulation. Acta Psych. et Neurol. Supp.6 (1935), 26–34.
Code, C. F., W. I. Dingle, andV. H. K. Moorhouse, Cardiovascular carotid sinus reflex. Amer. J. Physiol.115 (1936), 249–260.
Hardesty, W. H., B. Roberts, J. F. Toole, andH. P. Royster, Studies on carotid artery flow. Surgery49 (1961), 251–256.
Meyer, J. S., andD. Denny-Brown, Cerebral collateral circulation: factors influencing collateral blood flow. Neurol.7 (1957), 447–458.
Stern, W. E., W. J. Brown, andJ. F. Alksne, The surgical challenge of carotid-cavernous fistulae: critical role of intracranial circulatory dynamics. J. Neurosurg.27 (1967), 298–308.
Stern, W.E., Assessment of circulatory adequacy attendant upon carotid artery occlusion. Arch. Neurol.21 (1969), 455–465.
Symon, L., andS. Ishikawa, Cerebral arterial pressure changes and the development of leptomeningeal collateral circulation. Neurol.13 (1963), 237–250.
Tindall, G. T., G. L. Odom, M. L. Dillon, H. B. Cupp, M. S. Mahaley, andJ. C. Greenfield, Direction of blood flow in the internal and external carotid arteries following occlusion of the ipsilateral common carotid artery. J. Neurosurg.20 (1963), 985–994.
Youmans, J. R., G. W. Kindt, andO. C. Mitchell, Extended studies of direction of flow and pressure in the internal carotid artery following common carotid artery ligation. J. Neurosurg.27 (1967), 250–254.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported in part by a grant from the U.S. Public Health Service (2 T01 NB 5465).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, G.A., Stern, W.E. Experiments on carotid artery flow increase as a result of contralateral carotid occlusion. Acta neurochir 23, 221–228 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01401854
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01401854