Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical evaluation of a simple epidural pressure sensor

  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The Plastimed® epidural pressure sensor was evaluated in 35 patients, twenty-eight of whom were suffering from head injury. In seven patients simultaneous intraventricular pressure measurements were obtained. The epidural pressure sensor was only functioning satisfactorily in approximately 2/3 of the patients, while it was malfunctioning or not functioning in the remainder. In seven comparable IVP/EDP studies significant differences up to 25 mm Hg were noted. In three patients IVP was greater than EDP. In two patients the opposite was true. No significant complications were observed.

These unsatisfactory results have made us abandon the technique and resort to intraventricular or subarachnoidal pressure measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gjerris F, Børgesen SE, Sørensen SC (1980) Clinical evaluation of a new epidural pressure transducer. In: Shulman K, Marmarou A, Miller JD, Becker DP, Hochwald GM (eds) Intracranial pressure IV. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 386–389

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guggiari M, Bianchi A (1983) Mesure de la pression intracrânienne (PIC). Corrélations entre les pressions obtenues à l'aide d'un capteur extra-dural (PED) et d'un capteur intraventriculaire (PIV). Agressologie (24) 9: 389–390

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guillaume J, Janny P (1951) Manomatrie intracrânienne continue. Intérêt de la méthode et premiers résultats. Rev Neurol 84: 131–142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoff J, Barber R (1974) Transcerebral mantle pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Arch Neurol 31: 101–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnston IH, Jennett B (1973) The place of continuous intracranial pressure monitoring in neurosurgical practice. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 29: 53–63

    Google Scholar 

  6. Langfitt TW, Weinstein JD, Kassell NF, Gangliardi LJ (1964) Transmission of increased intracranial pressure. II. Within the supratentorial space. J Neurosurg 21: 998–1005

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lundberg N (1960) Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand [Suppl] (149) 36: 1–193

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosner MJ, Becker DP (1976) ICP monitoring: Complications and associated factors. Clin Neurosurg 23: 494–519

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sundbärg G, Kjällquist AA Lundberg N, Pontén U (1972) Complication due to prolonged ventricular fluid pressure recording in clinical practice. In: Brock M, Dietz H (eds) Intracranial pressure. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 348–352

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weaver DD, Winn HR, Jane JA (1982) Differential intracranial pressure in patients with unilateral mass lesions. J Neurosurg 56: 660–665

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kosteljanetz, M., Børgesen, S.E., Stjernholm, P. et al. Clinical evaluation of a simple epidural pressure sensor. Acta neurochir 83, 108–111 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01402387

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01402387

Keywords

Navigation