Skip to main content
Log in

Rate of increase and critical amount of nuclear polyhedrosis virus in lepidopterous larvae estimated from survival time assay data with a birth-death model

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Archives of Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A birth-death model developed for pathogens of vertebrates was used to estimate the in vivo rate of increase (α) and the doubling time (td) from survival time assay data. Host-pathogen combinations used in this study were twoAutographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus isolates inTrichoplusia ni andHeliothis zea NPV inH. zea. The α's, estimated as he negative reciprocal of the slope of the linearly decreasing section of the plot of median survival times against the logarithm of inoculum concentration, were calculated in two ways. First, simple regression was used to fit a line through the linearly decreasing part using data points selected by eye; secondly, a three-phase segmented linear regression model was used and α was estimated from the slope of the middle segment. Estimates of α (and td) were 0.338 (2.05), 0.274 (2.53) and 0.243 h−1 (2.85 h) using the simple regression method, and, 0.385 (1.80), 0.305 (2.27) and 0.223 h−1 (3.11 h) using the 3-phase segmented linear regression model for AcMNPV-1A, AcMNPV-HOB and HzSNPV, respectively. Although AcMNPV-HOB killed larvae faster (6 to 13 h) than AcMNPV-1A, it multiplied more slowly. Estimates for the critical number ranged from 4.8×109 to 4.5×1014 genome copies for HzSNPV inH. zea larvae and AcMNPV-1A inT. ni larvae, respectively. The significance of the calculated critical numbers is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen DM, Cady FB (1982) Analyzing experimental data by regression. Wadsworth, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armitage P, Meynell GG, Williams T (1965) Birth-death and other models for microbial infection. Nature 207: 570–572

    Google Scholar 

  3. Draper NR, Smith H (1981) Applied regression analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 252–257

    Google Scholar 

  4. Granados RR, Lawler KA, Burand JP (1981) Replication ofHeliothis zea baculovirus in an insect cell line. Intervirology 16: 71–79

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gregory BG, Ignoffo CM, Shapiro M (1969) Nucleopolyhedrosis ofHeliothis: morphological description of inclusion bodies and virions. J Invertebr Pathol 14: 186–193

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huber J, Hughes PR (1984) Quantitative bioassay in insect pathology. Bull Entomol Soc Am 30: 31–34

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hughes PR, Gettig RR, McCarthy WJ (1983) Comparison of the time-mortality response ofHeliothis zea to 14 isolates ofHeliothis nuclear polyhedrosis virus. J Invertebr Pathol 41: 256–261

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes PR, van Beek NAM, Wood HA (1986) A modified droplet feeding method for rapid assay ofBacillus thuringiensis and baculoviruses in noctuid larvae. J Invertebr Pathol 48: 187–192

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hughes PR, Wood HA (1981) A synchronous peroral technique for the bioassay of insect viruses. J Invertebr Pathol 37: 154–159

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes PR, Wood HA (1986) In vivo and in vitro bioassay methods for baculoviruses. In: Granados RR, Federici BA (eds) The biology of baculoviruses, vol 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hughes PR, Wood HA, Burand JP, Granados RR (1984) Quantification of the dose-mortality response ofTrichoplusia ni, Heliothis zea, andSpodoptera frugiperda to nuclear polyhedrosis viruses: applicability of an exponential model. J Invertebr Pathol 43: 343–350

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meynell GG, Meynell EW (1958) The growth of micro-organisms in vivo with particular reference to the relation between dose and latent period. J Hyg (Camb) 56: 323–346

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saaty TL (1961) Some stochastic processes with absorbing barriers. J R Stat Soc [B] 23: 319–334

    Google Scholar 

  14. SAS Institute Inc (1985) SASR user's guide: statistics version, 5th edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, pp 39–83

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shortley G (1965) A stochastic model for distributions of biological response times. Biometrics 21: 562–582

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shortley G, Wilkins JR (1965) Independent-action and birth-death models in experimental microbiology. Bacteriol Rev 29: 102–141

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van Beek NAM, Wood HA, Hughes PR (1988) Quantitative aspects of nuclear polyhedrosis virus infections in lepidopterous larvae: the dose-survival time relationship. J Invertebr Pathol 51: 58–63

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williams T (1965) The basic birth-death model for microbial infections. J R Stat Soc [B] 27: 338–360

    Google Scholar 

  19. Williams T (1965) The distribution of response times in a birth-death process. Biometrika 52: 581–585

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wood HA (1980) Protease degradation ofAutographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus proteins. Virology 103: 392–399

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wood HA, Hughes PR, Johnston LB, Langridge WHR (1981) Increased virulence ofAutographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus by mutagenesis. J Invertebr Pathol 38: 236–241

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Beek, N.A.M., Wood, H.A., Angellotti, J.E. et al. Rate of increase and critical amount of nuclear polyhedrosis virus in lepidopterous larvae estimated from survival time assay data with a birth-death model. Archives of Virology 100, 51–60 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01310907

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01310907

Keywords

Navigation