Skip to main content
Log in

Tentacle contraction and ultrastructure inDiscophrya collini: The response to cations

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Discophrya collini is a suctorian protozoan with contractile tentacles containing a microtubule-lined canal and microfilaments. The effects of a range of cations on tentacle contraction and ultrastructure have been determined. Treatment with 80 mM CaCl2 and 95 mM MgCl2 causes contraction to 28% and 57% of the control length respectively. Re-extension takes over 4 hours in the culture medium, but CaCl2-treated tentacles are re-extended after a 5 minutes treatment with 10−2 M EDTA or 5 × 10−3 M EGTA. CuCl2 causes a significant contraction at 10−5 M (to 77%); LaCl3 at 10−4 M (to 65%); ZnCl2 at 10−2 M (to 65%), but BaCl2, CoCl2, MnCl2, NiCl2, and SrCl2 cause significant changes only at 10−1 M.

The cytoplasm of CaCl2-treated cells contains two forms of membraneous structures when viewed in TEM; that of MgCl2-treated cells reveals granular areas of medium electron density. None of these features are seen in control cells. The microtubules of the tentacle canal appear to be intact upon its retraction into the cell with no change occurring in the numbers or relative positions of the microtubules. The tentacle cortex is wrinkled. It is suggested from this and previous work that tentacle contraction may be mediated by a microfilament-based mechanism, and that calcium may be involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bruce, D. L., Marshall, J. M., 1965: Some ionic and bioelectric properties of the amoebaChaos chaos. J. gen. Physiol.49, 151–178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, A., Butler, R. D., 1976: The ultrastructure, function and morphogenesis of the tentacle inDiscophrya sp. (Suctorida, Cileatea). J. Ultrastruct. Res.56, 164–176.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, R., 1972: Bioelectric control of ciliary activity-locomotion in the ciliated protozoa is regulated by membrane-limited calcium fluxes. Science176, 473–481.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geldard, B., 1977: Cytological and physiological studies ofDendrocometes paradoxus (Stein). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester.

  • Gingell, D., Garrod, D. R., Palmer, J. F., 1970: Divalent cations and cell adhesions. In: Symposium on calcium and cellular function (Cuthbert, A. W., ed.), pp. 59–64. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackney, C. M., Butler, R. D., 1981 a: A reactivatable glycerol model of tentacle contraction inDiscophrya collini, and the localization of HMM-binding filaments. J. Cell Sci.47, 65–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1981 b: Electrically-induced retraction in the suctorian protozoanDiscophrya collini (Root). J. Protozool.28, 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1981 c: Distribution of calcium in the suctorian protozoan,Discophrya collini: an X-ray microanalytical study. Tissue and Cell13, 453–459.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M., van Eys, M., 1976: Microtubules and associated microfilaments in the tentacle of the suctorianHeliophrya erhardi Matines. J. Cell Sci.20, 589–617.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hille, B., Woodhull, A. M., Shapiro, B. I., 1975: Negative surface charge near sodium channels of nerve: divalent ions, monovalent ions, and pH. Phil. Trans. R. Soc.B270, 301–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyams, J. S., Borisy, G. G., 1975: The dependence of the waveform and direction of beat ofChlamydomonas flagella on calcium ions. J. Cell Biol.67, 186 a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. R., Jahn, T. L., Fonseca, J. R., 1966: Contraction of protoplasm. I. Cinematographic analysis of the anodally stimulated contraction ofSpirostomum ambiguus. J. Cell Physiol.68, 127–133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.-C, Auersperg, N., 1980: Calcium in epithelial cell contraction. J. Cell Biol.85, 325–336.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naitoh, Y., Eckert, R., 1968: Electrical properties ofParamecium caudatum. Modification by bound and free cations. Z. vergl. Physiol.61, 427–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okajima, A., 1957: Protoplasmic contraction observed on the tentacles of the suctorian. I. Effects of electrolytes in the medium. Annot. Zool. Japonensis.30, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitelka, D. R., 1970: Ciliate ultrastructure: some problems in cell biology. J. Protozool.17, 1–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Railkin, A. I., Seravin, L. N., 1981: Influence of nickel, cobalt and lanthanum ions on the mobility and contractility of unicellular organisms. Progress in Protozoology, Abst.303, VI. Int. Congr. Protozool., Warsaw.

  • Roth, L. E., Shigenaka, Y., 1970: Microtubules in the heliozoan axopodium II. Rapid degradation by cupric and nickelous ions. J. Ultrastruct. Res.31, 356–374.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rüegg, J. C., 1968: Contractile mechanisms of smooth muscle. Symposium of the Society of experimental Biology22, 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabri, A. W., 1977: Cytological studies of suctorian protozoa. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester.

  • Schmidt, J. A., Eckert, R., 1976: Calcium couples flagellar reversal to photostimulation inChlamydomonas reinhardii. Nature262, 713–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchiya, T., Takahashi, K., 1976: Localization of possible calcium binding sites in the cilia ofParamecium caudatum. J. Protozool.23, 523–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J. P., 1976: Calcium chemistry and its relation to biological function. Symposium of the Society of experimental. Biology30, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hackney, C.M., Al-Khazzar, A.R. & Butler, R.D. Tentacle contraction and ultrastructure inDiscophrya collini: The response to cations. Protoplasma 112, 92–100 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01280219

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01280219

Keywords

Navigation