Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of the lipophilicity of some anti-hypoxia drugs: Comparison of TLC and HPLC methods

  • Originals
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The lipophilicity of 14 anti-hypoxia drugs has been determined by reversed phase thin-layer (RPTLC) and reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography (RPHPLC) in eluent systems containing different concentrations of acetonitrile and potassium dihydrogen phosphate. There was significant correlation between lipophilicity and the specific hydrophobic surface area of the drugs in RPTLC, indicating that the drugs behave as an homologous series of compounds. In RPTLC the concentration of buffer has a negligible effect on the retention of the drugs whereas in RPHPLC the buffer concentration influenced the retention. This discrepancy can be explained by the lower sensitivity of RPTLC. There was strong correlation between lipophilicity values determined by both methods, proving that both are suitable for the determination of molecular lipophilicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Blaney, Chem. Industr.3, 791 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.H. Bromilow, K. Chamberlain, A. A. Evans, Weed Sci.38, 305 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Ebert, A. R. Katritzky, G. Musumarra, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat.10, 101 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. W. Ladner, Pestic. Sci.29, 317 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Franke, in:J. K. Seydel ed.: SAR Strategies in the Design of Bioactive Compounds. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, Germany, 1985, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Kaliszan, Quantitative Structure — Chromatographic Retention Relationships, J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Vaara, W. Z. Plachy, H. Nikaido, Biochim. Biophys. Acta1024, 152 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Camilleri, D. P. Astles, M. W. Kerr, J. E. Spencer, J. Agr. Food Chem.38, 1601 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Fini, A. Roda, A. M. Bellini, E. Mencini, M. Guarnieri, J. Pharm. Sci.79, 603 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Falk, H. K. Matthies, Pharmazie45, 191 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Steinborn, C. Tabue, H. J. Mest, Pharmazie45, 370 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Siwek, J. Sliwiok, J. Chromatogr.506, 109 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Yamagami, T. Ogura, N. Takao, J. Chromatogr.514, 123 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. J. Lambert, L. A. Wright, J. K. Stevens, Pharm. Res.7, 577 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. János, Gy. Oros, J. Chromatogr.520, 217 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zs. Budavári-Bárány, Gy. Szász, K. Takács-Novák, J. Vámos, J. Kökösi, M. Józan, J. Liquid Chromatogr.13, 1485 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. L. Biagi, M. C. Guerra, A. M. Barbaro, S. Barbieri, M. Recanatini, P. A. Borea, J. Liquid Chromatogr.13, 913 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Rittich, M. Polster, O. Králik, J. Chromatogr.197, 43 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gy. Vigh, J. Varga-Puhony, J. Hlaway, E. Pap, J. Chromatogr.236, 51 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Engelhardt, H. Müller, J. Chromatogr.218, 395 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Cserháti, Y. M. Darwish, Gy. Matolcsy, J. Chromatogr.241, 223 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. Cserháti, B. Bordás, E. Tyihák, J. Chromatogr.365, 289 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  23. T. Cserháti, M. Szögyi, L. Györfi, Chromatographia20, 253 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. Cserháti, B. Bordás, M. Szögyi, Chromatographia21, 312 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Cserháti, M. Szögyi, L. Lelkes, J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods16, 263 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  26. T. Erdey-Gruz, Transport Phenomena in Aqueous Solutions, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gy. Bánhegyi, T. Cserháti, K. Valkó, J. Chromatogr.553, 407 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. Papa, E. Schwenk, F. Villani, E. Klingsberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc.70, 3356 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  29. L. Dobay, J. Fischer, E. Ezer, J. Matuz, L. Szporny, K. Sághy, Hungarian Patent No. 198012.

  30. J. Fischer, L. Dobay, Gy. Fekete, E. Ezer, J. Matuz, L. Szporny, Hungarian Patent No. 198294.

  31. C. Horváth, W. Melander, I. Molnár, J. Chromatogr.125, 129 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  32. T. Cserháti, Chromatographia18, 318 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  33. K. Valkó, J. Liquid Chromatogr.7, 1405 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  34. P. J. Lewi, Arzneim. Forsch.26, 1295 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. W. Sammon, Jr., IEEE Transactions on Computers, C18, 401 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  36. H. Mager, Moderne Regressionsanalyse, Salle, Sauerlander, Frankfurt am Main, 1982, p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallerstein, S., Cserháti, T. & Fischer, J. Determination of the lipophilicity of some anti-hypoxia drugs: Comparison of TLC and HPLC methods. Chromatographia 35, 275–280 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02277509

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02277509

Key Words

Navigation