A comparison is made between Massmann-type furnaces (with and without the L'vov platform) and constant temperature atomizers. It is shown that there is no major difference between these types of furnaces with regard to peak height sensitivities. On the other hand, the Massmann-type furnaces shoved to a greater extent susceptibilities towards matrix interference effects. The effect of the sample residence time on gas phase interference effects has been investigated at various constant temperatures for lead in large excesses of iron chloride and sodium sulphate, respectively. These experimental results are discussed and they are correlated to data obtained by high temperature equilibrium calculations. As a conclusion we found that there is a need for a better control of the gas phase inside graphite tubes. Advantages of separating the volatilization and atomization processes are discussed. The potentialities of constant temperature atomizers for atomic emission spectroscopy are lined out.
Since its inception, conventional GFAAS has been developed considerably with regard to methodology and instrumentation. The technique has been essentially improved by the introduction of e.g., automatic sample devices, the L'vov platform technique, matrix modifications, pyrolytically coated graphite, automatic background correctors, adequate signal evaluation and rapid controlled heating of the atomizers. In spite of this progress there still remain problems in connection with the vaporization/atomization of samples. In conventional Massmann-type furnaces, the temperature at which an element is vaporized depends on its volatility and usually effective atomization temperatures are often too low for complete atomization. An additional disadvantage comprises difficulties in relating absorbance signals, which may originate from different atomization intervals, to true amounts of an element. Many of these problems inherent in Massmann-type furnaces can be eliminated by vaporizing samples into atomizers which are kept at a constant temperature. This concept was employed in the first graphite furnace ever built for analytical AAS [l], but due to the technical complexity of the isothermal approach, it has only been realized on a minor scale and therefore little is known about its limitations.
By vaporizing samples from a platform [2,3] inserted into Massmann-type furnaces, the problems arising from non-isothermal atomization can often be minimized in a relatively simple way. In particular for volatile elements it is possible to approach conditions of constant temperature atomizers by the combined use of the platform technique with an element stabilizing modifier solution [4,5].
The aim of this paper is to characterize isothermal as well as Massmann-type atomizers (equipped with and without platforms) with respect to sensitivity and susceptibility to interference effects as well as identifying future needs in order to develop the graphite furnace technique further.
