Yields and genetic histories of 128Sb, 129Sb and 130Sb from thermal-neutron induced fission of 235U

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(74)80052-7Get rights and content

Abstract

The following fractional independent yields have been determined: 10-min 128Sb, ≤0·037; 9·1-hr 128Sb, 0·031 ± 0·005; 129Sb, 0·114 ± 0·046; 6·3-min 130Sb, 0·202 ± 0·030; 40-min 130Sb, 0·138 ± 0·034. The cumulative yield of 130Sn has been determined to be 0·89 ± 0·10%, and the following chain yields have been derived from this, the fractional independent yields and literature values: A = 128, 0·344 ± 0·018%; A = 129, 0·61 ± 0·03%; A = 130, 1·43 ± 0·18%. It has also been determined that 3·1 ± 0·2% of 128Sn decays to the 9·1-hr 128Sb isomer and that 52·9 ± 3·4% of 129Sb is formed by decay of 2·5-min 129Sn and 35·7 ± 3·0% is formed by decay of 7·4-min 129Sn.

Rapid chemical separation procedures are described, and a method is discussed of correcting gamma-ray peak areas determined with a Ge(Li) detector for decay of activities and for changing analyzer dead-time during each counting period.

The yields of the antimony isotopes are all somewhat smaller than estimated “normal” yields, as has usually been observed for odd Z nuclides. The data help to show that most of the large initial increase in yield with mass number above A = 125 is due to the increasing cumulative yields of tin isotopes, an indication that closure of the 50-proton shell is an important cause for the high probability of asymmetric mass division in low energy fission.

References (53)

  • B.R. Erdal et al.

    J. inorg. nucl. Chem.

    (1971)
  • B.R. Erdal et al.

    J. inorg. nucl. Chem.

    (1968)
  • C. Lin et al.

    J. inorg. nucl. Chem.

    (1972)
  • C. Lin et al.

    J. inorg. nucl. Chem.

    (1973)
  • B.R. Erdal et al.

    J. inorg. nucl. Chem.

    (1969)
  • A.C. Wahl et al.

    J. inorg. nucl. Chem.

    (1972)
  • R. Gunnink et al.

    Nucl. Inst. Meth.

    (1968)
  • J. McDonald et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1971)
  • G. Herrmann

    Habilitationsschrift, Mainz, Germany

    (1961)
  • A.C. Wahl et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1962)
  • B.G. Kiselev et al.

    Soviet J. Nucl. Phys.

    (1972)
  • B.J. Dropesky et al.

    J. inorg. nucl. Chem.

    (1962)
  • J. Mattauch et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1965)
  • J.D. Hughes et al.

    BNL 325

    (1958)
    J.D. Hughes et al.

    BNL 325

    (1960)
  • G.P. Ford et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1965)
    G. P. Ford, Personal communication,...
  • A.C. Wahl et al.
  • B.L. Tracy et al.

    Can. J. Phys.

    (1970)
  • J. Blachot et al.
  • A.C. Pappas et al.

    J. inorg. nucl. Chem.

    (1965)
  • M.M. Fowler et al.

    J. inorg. nucl. Chem.

    (1974)
  • G. Rudstam et al.
  • G. Herrmann

    Radiochim. Acta

    (1964)
  • A.E. Greendale et al.

    Analyt. Chem.

    (1963)
  • H. Folger et al.

    Radiochem. Radioanal. Letters

    (1970)
  • D.E. Troutner et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1964)
  • J.B. Cumming

    U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Report No. NAS-NS-3107

    (1963)
  • Cited by (23)

    • Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 128

      2015, Nuclear Data Sheets
    • Nuclear data sheets for A = 128

      2001, Nuclear Data Sheets
    • Nuclear Data Sheets for A=128

      1983, Nuclear Data Sheets
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The work described in this article was supported by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission under Contract Number AT(11-1)-1162. The article was abstracted in part from the Ph.D. Thesis of Malcolm M. Fowler, Washington University, St. Louis, Mo. (1972).

    Present address: Department of Chemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

    View full text